Single- and hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for large (> 2 cm) brain metastases: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Jung Lee ◽  
Kyu-Sun Choi ◽  
Eun Suk Park ◽  
Young Hyun Cho
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery

scholarly journals Cyberknife® hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (CK-hSRS) as salvage treatment for brain metastases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergej Telentschak ◽  
Daniel Ruess ◽  
Stefan Grau ◽  
Roland Goldbrunner ◽  
Niklas von Spreckelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Large Tumor ◽  
Fractionated Radiotherapy ◽  
Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Abstract Purpose The introduction of hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (hSRS) extended the treatment modalities beyond the well-established single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated radiotherapy. Here, we report the efficacy and side effects of hSRS using Cyberknife® (CK-hSRS) for the treatment of patients with critical brain metastases (BM) and a very poor prognosis. We discuss our experience in light of current literature. Methods All patients who underwent CK-hSRS over 3 years were retrospectively included. We applied a surface dose of 27 Gy in 3 fractions. Rates of local control (LC), systemic progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan–Meier method. Treatment-related complications were rated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Results We analyzed 34 patients with 75 BM. 53% of the patients had a large tumor, tumor location was eloquent in 32%, and deep seated in 15%. 36% of tumors were recurrent after previous irradiation. The median Karnofsky Performance Status was 65%. The actuarial rates of LC at 3, 6, and 12 months were 98%, 98%, and 78.6%, respectively. Three, 6, and 12 months PFS was 38%, 32%, and 15%, and OS was 65%, 47%, and 28%, respectively. Median OS was significantly associated with higher KPS, which was the only significant factor for survival. Complications CTCAE grade 1–3 were observed in 12%. Conclusion Our radiation schedule showed a reasonable treatment effectiveness and tolerance. Representing an optimal salvage treatment for critical BM in patients with a very poor prognosis and clinical performance state, CK-hSRS may close the gap between surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, conventional radiotherapy, and palliative care.

Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Management of Limited (1-4) Brain Metasteses: Systematic Review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guideline

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel T Chao ◽  
Antonio De Salles ◽  
Motohiro Hayashi ◽  
Marc Levivier ◽  
Lijun Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Neurocognitive Function ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Published Evidence ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Brain Radiation

Abstract BACKGROUND Guidelines regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases are missing recently published evidence. OBJECTIVE To conduct a systematic review and provide an objective summary of publications regarding SRS in managing patients with 1 to 4 brain metastases. METHODS Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using PubMed and Medline up to November 2016. A separate search was conducted for SRS for larger brain metastases. RESULTS Twenty-seven prospective studies, critical reviews, meta-analyses, and published consensus guidelines were reviewed. Four key points came from these studies. First, there is no detriment to survival by withholding whole brain radiation (WBRT) in the upfront management of brain metastases with SRS. Second, while SRS on its own provides a high rate of local control (LC), WBRT may provide further increase in LC. Next, WBRT does provide distant brain control with less need for salvage therapy. Finally, the addition of WBRT does affect neurocognitive function and quality of life more than SRS alone. For larger brain metastases, surgical resection should be considered, especially when factoring lower LC with single-session radiosurgery. There is emerging data showing good LC and/or decreased toxicity with multisession radiosurgery. CONCLUSION A number of well-conducted prospective and meta-analyses studies demonstrate good LC, without compromising survival, using SRS alone for patients with a limited number of brain metastases. Some also demonstrated less impact on neurocognitive function with SRS alone. Practice guidelines were developed using these data with International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society consensus.

The Role of Radiosurgery to the Tumor Bed After Resection of Brain Metastases

Neurosurgery ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared H. Gans ◽  
Daniel M.S. Raper ◽  
Ashish H. Shah ◽  
Amade Bregy ◽  
Deborah Heros ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Local Control ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Whole Brain Radiation ◽  
Brain Radiation

Abstract BACKGROUND: Optimal postoperative management paradigm for brain metastases remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review of the literature to understand the role of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery after resection of brain metastases. METHODS: We performed a MEDLINE search of the literature to identify series of patients with brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery after surgical resection. Outcomes including overall survival, local control, distant intracranial failure, and salvage therapy use were recorded. Patient, tumor, and treatment factors were correlated with outcomes through the use of the Pearson correlation and 2-way Student t test as appropriate. RESULTS: Fourteen studies involving 629 patients were included. Median survival for all studies was 14 months. Local control was correlated with the median volume treated with radiosurgery (r = −0.766, P < .05) and with the rate of gross total resection (r = .728, P < .03). Mean crude local control was 83%; 1-year local control was 85%. Distant intracranial failure occurred in 49% of cases, and salvage whole-brain radiation therapy was required in 29% of cases. Use of a radiosurgical margin did not lead to increased local control or overall survival. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review supports the use of radiosurgery as a safe and effective strategy for adjuvant treatment of brain metastases, particularly when gross total resection has been achieved. With all limitations of comparisons between studies, no increase in local recurrence or decrease in overall survival compared with rates with adjuvant whole-brain radiation therapy was found.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document