scholarly journals Ensuring Prevention Science Research is Synthesis-Ready for Immediate and Lasting Scientific Impact

Author(s):  
Emily A. Hennessy ◽  
Rebecca L. Acabchuk ◽  
Pieter A. Arnold ◽  
Adam G. Dunn ◽  
Yong Zhi Foo ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Charron

This chapter discusses a wide scope of the available indicators of quality of government. It begins with a brief history of the development of the indicators and their scientific impact on social science research. The chapter posits a typology of the various ways in which indicators of governance can differ and implications of such differences. The chapter then reveals the degree to which contemporary cross-country indicators of corruption in particular correlate. Next, several well-established critiques of contemporary data are presented. The chapter concludes with several comments on what makes a good quality indicator and puts for several suggestions for future work in this ever-growing field.


2022 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. e2113067119
Author(s):  
Diego Kozlowski ◽  
Vincent Larivière ◽  
Cassidy R. Sugimoto ◽  
Thema Monroe-White

The US scientific workforce is primarily composed of White men. Studies have demonstrated the systemic barriers preventing women and other minoritized populations from gaining entry to science; few, however, have taken an intersectional perspective and examined the consequences of these inequalities on scientific knowledge. We provide a large-scale bibliometric analysis of the relationship between intersectional identities, topics, and scientific impact. We find homophily between identities and topic, suggesting a relationship between diversity in the scientific workforce and expansion of the knowledge base. However, topic selection comes at a cost to minoritized individuals for whom we observe both between- and within-topic citation disadvantages. To enhance the robustness of science, research organizations should provide adequate resources to historically underfunded research areas while simultaneously providing access for minoritized individuals into high-prestige networks and topics.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Alden Hennessy ◽  
Rebecca Acabchuk ◽  
Pieter Andrew Arnold ◽  
Adam G. Dunn ◽  
Yong Zhi Foo ◽  
...  

Synthesis of evidence from the totality of relevant research is essential to inform and improve prevention efforts and policy. Given the large and usually heterogeneous evidence available,reaching a thorough understanding of what works, for whom, and in what contexts, can only be achieved through a systematic and comprehensive synthesis of evidence. Many barriers impede comprehensive evidence synthesis, which leads to uncertainty about the generalizability of intervention effectiveness, including: inaccurate terminology titles/abstracts/keywords (hampering literature search efforts); ambiguous reporting of study methods (resulting ininaccurate assessments of study rigor); and poorly reported participant characteristics, outcomes, and key variables (obstructing the calculation of an overall effect or the examination of effect modifiers). To address these issues and improve the reach of primary studies through theirinclusion in evidence syntheses, we provide a set of practical guidelines to help prevention scientists prepare synthesis-ready research. We use a recent mindfulness trial as an empirical example to ground the discussion and demonstrate ways to ensure: (1) primary studies are discoverable; (2) the types of data needed for synthesis are present; and (3) these data are readily synthesizable. We highlight several tools and practices that can aid authors in these efforts, such as creating a repository for each project to host all study-related data files. We also provide step-by-step guidance and software suggestions for standardizing data design and public archiving to facilitate synthesis-ready research.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 18753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatou Maria Dramé ◽  
Emily E Crawford ◽  
Daouda Diouf ◽  
Chris Beyrer ◽  
Stefan D Baral

2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 279-289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Hassmiller Lich ◽  
Elizabeth M. Ginexi ◽  
Nathaniel D. Osgood ◽  
Patricia L. Mabry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document