Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on anxiety, depression, sleep quality and quality of life in heart failure patients: secondary analysis of the MOTIVATE-HF randomized controlled trial

Abstract Purpose Anxiety, depression, poor sleep quality and lower quality of life (QOL) are associated with worse outcomes in heart failure (HF) patients. Motivational interview (MI) has been effective in different patient populations to promote self-care. However, its effect on anxiety, depression, sleep quality and QOL in HF patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of MI on anxiety, depression, sleep quality and QOL over 12 months from the intervention. Methods This was a planned, secondary outcome analysis of the MOTIVATE-HF study, a three-arm randomized controlled trial (1:1:1) evaluating the effect of MI in improving self-care in HF patients. In Arm 1, the patient received MI, while in Arm 2, the patient and the caregiver received MI. Arm 3, the control group, received standard treatment. Endpoints were evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) every three months for one year. Results We enrolled and randomized 510 HF patient and caregiver dyads (155 dyads in Arm 1, 177 dyads in Arm 2, and 178 dyads in Arm 3). A total of 238 HF patients and 235 caregivers completed the 12-month trial. No significant changes were seen in anxiety, depression and sleep quality over time among the three study arms, but disease-specific QOL improved in the intervention groups, especially in Arm 2. Conclusion Clinicians may want to include both patients and caregivers when providing MI interventions. Further research is needed to investigate the required intensity of MI to be effective on sleep quality, anxiety and depression (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02894502).

Download Full-text

Effect of Illness Perception Correction - Based Educational Program on Quality Of Life and Self- Care in Patients with Heart Failure: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal of Caring Sciences ◽

10.15171/jcs.2019.013 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 89-93 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Ali Sadeghi Akbari ◽

Mohammad Ali Cheraghi ◽

Anoushiravan kazemnejad ◽

Mahin Nomali ◽

Maasumeh Zakerimoghadam

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Heart Failure ◽

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Educational Program ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Illness Perception ◽

Self Care ◽

Control Group ◽

Randomized Controlled

Introduction: Because of the chronic nature of Heart Failure (HF), low Quality of Life (QoL) and poor self-care are prevalent among patients with HF. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of illness perception correction- based educational program on QoL,and self- care in patients with HF. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 78 eligible patients were included in the study from Rajaei Heart Center (Tehran, Iran) and randomly assigned into intervention and control group with 1:1 allocation ratio. The intervention was a combination of illness perception correction- based education program (30- minute sessions over 3 consecutive days) and 10-minute phone calls made once a week in the course of 8 weeks. The control group received usual care. The primary outcome was quality of life and secondary outcomes were self- care and illness- perception which were measured at baseline and at the end of the study. SPSS version 13 was used for the analysis. Results: Out of 76 eligible patients, 70 patients with HF finished the study. Although the mean of quality of life, self-care, and illness perception were not different at baseline, QoL (45.2 (8.3) VS 66.8 (15.4); P<0.001), self-care (18.5 (4.5) VS 37.1 (7.2); P<0.001), and illness- perception (183.6 (8.4) VS 151.2 (24.5); P<0.001) improved following the program in the intervention group in comparison to the control group. Conclusion: According to the study findings, this program can be applied by nurses for patients with HF as a discharge plan in order to improve their QoL, self-care, and their illness perception.

Download Full-text

Faculty Opinions recommendation of High intensity, interval exercise improves quality of life of patients with chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial.

Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature ◽

10.3410/f.718129195.793522541 ◽

2016 ◽

Author(s):

Jerome Fleg

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Heart Failure ◽

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Chronic Heart Failure ◽

High Intensity ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Interval Exercise ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

High Intensity Interval

Download Full-text

Challenges of Telemonitoring Programs for Complex Chronic Conditions: A Randomized Controlled Trial with an Embedded Qualitative Study (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.31754 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Patrick Ware ◽

Amika Shah ◽

Heather Joan Ross ◽

Alexander Gordon Logan ◽

Phillip Segal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Randomized Controlled Trial ◽

Decision Support ◽

Chronic Conditions ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Self Care ◽

Randomized Controlled ◽

Complex Patients ◽

Secondary Outcomes

BACKGROUND Despite the growing prevalence of people with complex conditions and evidence of the positive impact of telemonitoring for single conditions, little research exists on the use of telemonitoring in this population, particularly those with multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). OBJECTIVE This randomized controlled trial (RCT) and embedded qualitative study aimed to evaluate the impact and experiences of patients and healthcare providers (HCPs) using a telemonitoring system with decision support to manage complex patients, including those with MCCs, compared to the standard of care. METHODS A pragmatic 6-month RCT sought to recruit 146 patients with a diagnosis of heart failure (HF), uncontrolled hypertension (HT), and/or insulin requiring diabetes (DM) from outpatient specialty settings in Toronto, Canada. Participants were randomized into the control and telemonitoring groups with the latter being instructed to take readings relevant to their condition(s). The telemonitoring system contained an algorithm that generated decision support in the form of actionable self-care directives to patients and alerts to HCPs. The primary outcome was health status as measured by the SF-36. Secondary outcomes included anxiety and depression, self-efficacy in chronic disease management, and self-reported healthcare utilization. HF-related quality of life and self-care measures were also collected from patients followed for HF. Within- and between-group change scores were analyzed for statistical significance (P<.05). A convenience sample of HCPs and patients in the intervention group were interviewed about their experiences RESULTS A total of 96 patients were recruited and randomized. Recruitment was terminated early due to implementation challenges and the onset of COVID-19. No significant within- and between-group differences were found for the main primary and secondary outcomes. However, a within-group analysis of HF patients found improvements in self-care maintenance (P=.036) and physical quality of life (P= .046). Opinions expressed by the 5 HCPs and 13 patients interviewed differed based on the condition(s) monitored. Although HF patients reported benefitting from actionable self-care guidance and meaningful interactions with their HCPs, patient and HCP users of the DM and HT modules did not think telemonitoring improved the clinical management of those conditions to the same degree. These differing experiences were largely attributed to the siloed nature of specialty care, and the design of the decision support whereby it was indicated that fluctuations in HT and DM patient status typically required less urgent intervention compared to HF. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with previous studies, we recommend that future research conceive telemonitoring as a program and that self-management and clinical decision support are necessary, but not sufficient components of such programs for complex patients with lower acuity. We conclude that a multidisciplinary model of care that includes care coordination must accompany telemonitoring systems which may best be operationalized through novel models of care, such as nurse-led models. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03127852, ISRCTN (41238563) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR2-10.2196/resprot.8367

Download Full-text