Interactions of Economics of Science and Science Education: Investigating the Implications for Science Teaching and Learning

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (10) ◽  
pp. 2405-2425 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sibel Erduran ◽  
Ebru Z. Mugaloglu
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Science Teaching ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Economics Of Science ◽  
Science Teaching And Learning

Science and Special Education

1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 128-133
Author(s):  
Rodney L. Doran ◽  
J. Richard Sentman
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Science Teaching ◽  
Alternative Assessment ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
School Science ◽  
The Other ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Special Issue ◽  
Science Teaching And Learning ◽  
Science Educators

This paper is organized into two major parts: a review of current activities in science education, and a review of the articles within this special issue. Project 2061 (aaas) and the scope, sequence, and coordination project (nsta) are ongoing efforts to develop new approaches for school science programs. Other reports and journals in the science education field are described briefly. “Constructivism” and “alternative assessment” are two of the ideas science educators are currently exploring as ways to improve science teaching and learning. The last section includes brief reviews of each of the other papers in this issue with special focus on the science education dimension. There is much we can learn from each other.

scholarly journals Reformed Teaching and Learning in Science Education: A Comparative Study of Turkish and US Teachers

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Burhan Ozfidan ◽  
Baki Cavlazoglu ◽  
Lynn Burlbaw ◽  
Hasan Aydin
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Science Teaching ◽  
Science Teachers ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Teaching Science ◽  
Science Teaching And Learning ◽  
Learning And Teaching ◽  
American Science ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Teachers Beliefs

Achievements of educational reform advantage constructivist understandings of teaching and learning, and therefore highlight a shift in beliefs of teachers and apply these perceptions to the real world. Science teachers’ beliefs have been crucial in understanding and reforming science education as beliefs of teachers regarding learning and teaching science impact their practice. The purpose of this study was to compare US and Turkish science teachers’ beliefs about reformed learning and teaching science. As an instrument, we used Beliefs about Reformed Science Teaching and Learning (BARSTL) to collect and measure the teachers’ beliefs regarding teaching and learning science education. We used an independent-sample t-test to analyze Turkish and American science teachers’ beliefs about reformed learning and teaching science. In total, 38 science teachers from the US and 27 science teachers from Turkey participated in this study. Results showed that US science teachers’ beliefs about reformed learning and teaching science are statistically higher than Turkish science teachers. The results of this study also indicated that although American and Turkish science education aim similar constructivist views on learning and teaching science, American science teachers hold more reformed beliefs in science teaching and learning than their Turkish colleagues.

scholarly journals Open-minded Environmental Education in the Science Classroom

Paideusis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43
Author(s):  
David P. Burns ◽  
Stephen P. Norris
Keyword(s):  
Science Education ◽  
Environmental Education ◽  
Science Teaching ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Science Classroom ◽  
Environmental Concerns ◽  
Environmental Advocacy ◽  
Science Teaching And Learning ◽  
Scientific Facts

In this paper we will discuss the issue of environmental advocacy in science education in light of William Hare’s concept of open-mindedness. Although we shall assume that science teaching and learning must go beyond the scientific facts and theories and deal with the implications of science for society, we shall argue that science education should also demand an open-mindedness about environmental concerns such that all proposals for sustainability and the like are weighed against the alternatives using the best scientific knowledge available. Our approach will be to describe two examples of environmental education that recommend insufficiently open-minded forms of teaching and a third example that avoids this shortcoming yet provides a sound basis in environmental education.

scholarly journals In-service teacher education course module design focusing on usability of ICT applications in science education

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jari Lavonen ◽  
Heidi Krzwacki ◽  
Laura Koistinen ◽  
Manuela Welzel-Breuer ◽  
Roger Erb
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Science Education ◽  
Science Teaching ◽  
Science Teachers ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Problem Analysis ◽  
International Survey ◽  
Science Teaching And Learning ◽  
Design Based Research ◽  
Module Design

Teachers face challenges in adopting ICT applications for science teaching and learning. An in-service teacher education course module addressing the needs of science teachers particularly was developed through a design-based research (DBR) project. The course module is designed to improve the readiness of teachers in choosing ICT applications for science education and taking the technical and pedagogical usability of the application into account. An international survey showed that clarifyingthe needs and constraints of using ICT applications in science education as well as introducing and discussing both technical and pedagogical usability with the teachers was important. Moreover, a theoretical analysis of the usability of ICT applications offers various views on meaningful learning and motivational aspects of science teaching and learning. In this paper, we report what we learned from the experience of designing the course module, which is described and discussed in terms of theoutcomes of both the theoretical and empirical problem analysis.

scholarly journals Designing Frameworks for Authentic Equity in Science Teaching and Learning: Informal Learning Environments and Teacher Education for STEM

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Jennifer D. Adams
Keyword(s):  
Teacher Education ◽  
Science Education ◽  
Science Teaching ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Teacher Identity ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Social Identities ◽  
Science Teaching And Learning ◽  
Design Learning ◽  
Teachers And Students

Abstract In order to advance authentic equity in science education, it is salient to have frameworks that allow educators and researchers to design learning environments, activities, and research agendas that centers students’ strengths in order for them to achieve full participation in science. As such it is important to consider the social identities of science education stakeholders—teachers and students—in teacher education. However, as identity is complex, it requires research approaches that elucidate not only the nuances of teacher identity but also the complexities of science teaching and learning environments. This article describes a collaborative research project that aimed to unpack the relationship between teacher identity and learning to teach. It outlines the collaborative process of theory building that includes teacher participants and the research team and how the framework for teacher education emerged that considers the various aspects of designing equitable and liberatory science learning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document