scholarly journals Psychometric Evaluation of the Hebrew Language Version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

2009 ◽  
Vol 96 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana Anaby ◽  
Tal Jarus ◽  
Bruno D. Zumbo
Keyword(s):  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
Language Version ◽  
Hebrew Language ◽  
Life Scale

Psychometric evaluation of the Danish and Swedish Satisfaction with Life Scale in first episode psychosis patients

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 537-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Hochwälder ◽  
Maria Mattsson ◽  
Ragnhild Holmqvist ◽  
Johan Cullberg ◽  
Bent Rosenbaum
Keyword(s):  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
First Episode Psychosis ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
First Episode ◽  
Episode Psychosis ◽  
Life Scale

Psychometric Evaluation of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) in Azerbaijan

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Narmin Osmanli ◽  
Anar Babayev ◽  
Ikram Rustamov ◽  
Kerim M. Munir
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
Subjective Well Being ◽  
Factorial Structure ◽  
Life Scale ◽  
Valid Instrument ◽  
Good Internal Consistency

The Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) is a globally recognized scale for the measurementof subjective well-being in more than thirty six languages. Currently there is no adaptedversion of the SCWS in Azerbaijani language. The aim of the present study was to completeforward and backward translations of the SWLS and maintaining equivalence to examine itspsychometric properties in a sample of 374 subjects in Azerbaijan. The results showed thatthe Azerbaijani version of SWLS had good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.81) withconfirmatory factor analysis showing a single factorial structure. The findings suggest that theAzerbaijani version of the SWLS is a valid instrument to use among Azerbaijan samples.

Satisfaction With Life Scale--American Sign Language Version

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine F. Wilson ◽  
Jared Embree ◽  
Deb Guthmann ◽  
Steven R. Sligar ◽  
Janet C. Titus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
American Sign Language ◽  
Sign Language ◽  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
American Sign ◽  
Language Version ◽  
Life Scale

scholarly journals Psychometrical indicators of the Russian-language version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

2015 ◽  
Vol 0 (9) ◽  
pp. 444
Author(s):  
Serguei Petrovich Yelshansky ◽  
Aleksandr Fedorovich Anufriev ◽  
Zulfiya Faridovna Kamaletdinova ◽  
Oleg Evgenievich Saparin ◽  
Dmitrij Vladimirovich Semyonov
Keyword(s):  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Russian Language ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
Language Version ◽  
Life Scale ◽  
The Russian Language

Psychometric evaluation of the satisfaction with life scale in Togo: A three-step approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 243-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Sovet ◽  
K.A. Atitsogbe ◽  
P. Pari ◽  
M.S.A. Park ◽  
A. Villieux
Keyword(s):  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Psychometric Evaluation ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
Life Scale

The German Version of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS)

2011 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heide Glaesmer ◽  
Gesine Grande ◽  
Elmar Braehler ◽  
Marcus Roth
Keyword(s):  
Convergent Validity ◽  
Satisfaction With Life ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Factorial Invariance ◽  
Satisfaction With Life Scale ◽  
Small Samples ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Confirmatory Factor Analyses ◽  
Life Scale

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) is the most commonly used measure for life satisfaction. Although there are numerous studies confirming factorial validity, most studies on dimensionality are based on small samples. A controversial debate continues on the factorial invariance across different subgroups. The present study aimed to test psychometric properties, factorial structure, factorial invariance across age and gender, and to deliver population-based norms for the German general population from a large cross-sectional sample of 2519 subjects. Confirmatory factor analyses supported that the scale is one-factorial, even though indications of inhomogeneity of the scale have been detected. Both findings show invariance across the seven age groups and both genders. As indicators of the convergent validity, a positive correlation with social support and negative correlation with depressiveness was shown. Population-based norms are provided to support the application in the context of individual diagnostics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document