Co and Fe Catalysed Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis in Biofuel Production

2011 ◽  
Vol 54 (16-18) ◽  
pp. 1302-1308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Romar ◽  
Riikka Lahti ◽  
Pekka Tynjälä ◽  
Ulla Lassi
2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dalia Liuzzi ◽  
Ekain Fernandez ◽  
Susana Perez ◽  
Enrique Ipiñazar ◽  
Amaya Arteche ◽  
...  

AbstractThe biomass-to-liquid (BtL) process is a promising technology to obtain clean, liquid, second-generation biofuels and chemicals. The BtL process, which comprises several steps, is based upon the gasification of biomass and the catalytic transformation of the syngas that is obtained via the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS) reaction, producing a hydrocarbon pool known as syncrude. The FTS process is a well-established technology, and there are currently very large FTS plants operating worldwide that produce liquid fuels and hydrocarbons from natural gas (NG) (gas-to-liquids, GtL process) and coal (coal-to-liquids, CtL process). Due to the limited availability of local biomass, the size of the BtL plants should be downscaled compared to that of a GtL or CtL plant. Since the feasibility of the XtL (X refers to any energy source that can be converted to liquid, including coal, NG, biomass, municipal solid waste, etc.) processes is strongly influenced by the economies of scale, the viability of small-scale BtL plants can be compromised. An interesting approach to overcome this issue is to increase the productivity of the FTS process by developing reactors and catalysts with higher productivities to generate the desired product fraction. Recently, by integrating membrane reactors with the FTS process the gas feeding and separation unit have been demonstrated in a single reactor. In this review, the most significant achievements in the field of catalytic membrane reactors for the FTS process will be discussed. Different types of membranes and configurations of membrane reactors, including H2O separation and H2-feed distribution, among others, will be analyzed.


Fuel ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 484-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadia H. Leibbrandt ◽  
Akinwale O. Aboyade ◽  
Johannes H. Knoetze ◽  
Johann F. Görgens

Author(s):  
Jimmy Jimmy ◽  
Achmad Roesyadi ◽  
Suprapto Suprapto ◽  
Firman Kurniawansyah

Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis (FTS) using Fe-Co/meso-HZSM-5 catalyst has been investigated. The impregnated iron and cobalt on HZSM-5 could be used as bifunction catalyst which combined polimerizing synthesis gas and long hydrocarbon cracking for making biofuel (saturated C5–C25 hydrocarbons as gasoline, kerosene and diesel oil). The study emphasized the effect of catalyst weight on product composition and process conversion. The HZSM-5, had been converted from ammonium ZSM-5 through calcination, and then desilicated with NaOH solution. The Co(NO3)2.6H2O and Fe(NO3)3.9H2O were used as precursor for incipient wetness impregnation (IWI) on amorphous meso-HZSM-5. The catalyst consisted of 10 % Fe and 90 % Co by weight, called 10Fe-90Co/meso-HZSM-5. All catalysts were reduced in situ in the continuous reactor with flowing hydrogen at 25 mL/min, 1 bar, 400 °C for 10 hours. The catalyst performance was observed in the same continuous fixed bed reactor at 25 mL/min synthesis gas (30 % CO, 60 % H2, 10 % N2), 250 °C, 20 bar for 96 hours. Various catalyst weight (1, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6 gram) were applied in FTS. The desilicated HZSM-5 properties (BET analysis) were 6.1–29.9 nm mesoporous diameter, 0.3496 cc/g average mesoporous volume, 526.035 cc/g pore surface area, and the EDX analysis gave 22.1059 Si/Al ratio and 16.11 % loading (by weight) on meso-HZSM-5. The reduced catalyst showed the XRD spectra of Fe (66°), Fe-Co alloy (44.50°) and Co3O4 (36.80°). The reaction using 1 gram of 10Fe-90Co/meso-HZSM-5 catalyst produced the largest composition and conversion. The 1 gram catalyst gave the largest normal selectivity of gasoline (19.15 %) and kerosene (55.18 %). While the largest normal diesel oil selectivity (24.17 %) was obtained from 1.4 gram of catalyst. The CO conversion per gram of catalyst showed similar value (CO conversion of 26–28 %) for all catalyst weight


2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 579-585
Author(s):  
Xiaofan CHENG ◽  
Baoshan WU ◽  
Hongwei XIANG ◽  
Yongwang LI

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (8) ◽  
pp. 919-927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuhan SUN ◽  
Jiangang CHEN ◽  
Jungang WANG ◽  
Litao JIA ◽  
Bo HOU ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (9) ◽  
pp. 1145-1150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyue DING ◽  
Yong YANG ◽  
Hongwei XIANG ◽  
Yongwang LI

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document