scholarly journals A standard nomenclature for gene designation in the Rosaceae

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sook Jung ◽  
Carole Bassett ◽  
Douglas G. Bielenberg ◽  
Chun-Huai Cheng ◽  
Chris Dardick ◽  
...  
1973 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 456-461
Author(s):  
Thomas A. Zachman ◽  
James E. Lankford ◽  
Lynn Hahn

The diversity of earmold specifications and nomenclature used by the manufacturers often makes it confusing and difficult to obtain an earmold with the characteristics necessary for the amplifying system. Eight earmold manufacturers were surveyed to determine whether or not they were in compliance with standard nomenclature proposed by the National Association of Earmold Manufacturers in 1970. The results show that the manufacturers do not appear to be following the NAEL proposal. A recommendation for the possible solution of the problem is presented.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 36-47
Author(s):  
Rashid Chandio ◽  
Shadab Fatima ◽  
Tarique Tarique ◽  
Saira Soomro

A well-prepared abstract enables the reader to identify the basic content of a document quickly and accurately, to determine its relevance to their interests, and thus to decide whether to read the document in its entirety. The Abstract should be informative and completely self-explanatory, provide a clear statement of the problem, the proposed approach, or solution, and point out major findings and conclusions. The Abstract should be 100 to 200 words in length. The abstract should be written in the past tense. Standard nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should be avoided. No literature should be cited. The keyword list provides the opportunity to add keywords, used by the indexing and abstracting services, in addition to those already present in the title. Judicious use of keywords may increase the ease with which interested parties can locate our article.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document