Contrast-Enhanced CT-based Textural Parameters as Potential Prognostic Factors of Survival for Colorectal Cancer Patients Receiving Targeted Therapy

Author(s):  
Yunuo Zhao ◽  
Jing Yang ◽  
Meng Luo ◽  
Yanfei Yang ◽  
Xinli Guo ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 83 (12) ◽  
pp. 2224-2230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Germán Andrés Jiménez Londoño ◽  
Ana María García Vicente ◽  
Victoria Sánchez Pérez ◽  
Fátima Jiménez Aragón ◽  
Alberto León Martin ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nivine Abdel Moneim Chalabi ◽  
Reem Hassan Bassiouny ◽  
Mohamed Abobakr El Sedek

Abstract Background This study was designed to assess the role of 18F-FDG CT was able to detect additional/CT in post-therapeutic surveillance of colorectal cancer patients as compared with contrast-enhanced CT to allow early detection of recurrent and metastatic cases amenable for curative surgery and thus improve the overall survival of patients. Results Of the total 100 patients, 70 proved to have metastasis or local recurrent disease by the standard reference modalities. One hundred eighty-two diseased regions were detected in these 70 patients. PET/CT was positive in 174 regions (95.6%) whereas CECT was positive in 118 regions (64.8%). PET/CT was superior to CECT in detection of hepatic focal lesions, metastatic lymph nodes, pulmonary metastases, and peritoneal and suprarenal metastases whereas both were equal in detection of osseous deposits. CECT detected four lesions that were missed by PET/CT, and these were hepatic metastases from mucinous adenocarcinoma. Conclusion PET/CT is a better method to evaluate post-therapeutic colorectal cancer patients. It detected viable residual tumor cells in operative bed scar, small LNs, hepatic focal lesions, peritoneal deposits, pulmonary masses, bone deposits, and suprarenal deposits with significantly higher specificity and sensitivity than CECT avoiding unnecessary surgeries.


Cancer ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (12) ◽  
pp. 2913-2921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrizia Ferroni ◽  
Mario Roselli ◽  
Antonella Spila ◽  
Roberta D'Alessandro ◽  
Ilaria Portarena ◽  
...  

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinghao Cao ◽  
Shenghe Deng ◽  
Lizhao Yan ◽  
Junnan Gu ◽  
Jia Yang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Serum bilirubin and total bile acid (TBA) levels have been reported to be strongly associated with the risk and prognosis of certain cancers. Here, we aimed to investigate the effects of pretreatment levels of serum bilirubin and bile acids on the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods A retrospective cohort of 1474 patients with CRC who underwent surgical resection between January 2015 and December 2017 was included in the study. Survival analysis was used to evaluate the predictive value of pretreatment levels of bilirubin and bile acids. X-Tile software was used to identify optimal cut-off values for total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL) and TBA in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results DBIL, TBIL, and TBA were validated as significant prognostic factors by univariate Cox regression analysis for both 3-year OS and DFS. Multivariate Cox regression analyses confirmed that high DBIL, TBIL and TBA levels were independent prognostic factors for both OS (HR: 0.435, 95% CI: 0.299–0.637, P < 0.001; HR: 0.436, 95% CI: 0.329–0.578, P < 0.001; HR: 0.206, 95% CI: 0.124–0.341, P < 0.001, respectively) and DFS (HR: 0.583, 95% CI: 0.391–0.871, P = 0.008; HR:0.437,95% CI: 0.292–0.655, P <0.001; HR: 0.634, 95% CI: 0.465–0.865, P = 0.004, respectively). In addition, nomograms for OS and DFS were established according to all significant factors, and the c-indexes were 0.819 (95% CI: 0.806–0.832) and 0.835 (95% CI: 0.822–0.849), respectively. Conclusions TBIL, DBIL and TBA levels are independent prognostic factors in colorectal cancer patients. The nomograms based on OS and DFS can be used as a practical model for evaluating the prognosis of CRC patients.


1999 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 721-726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young Jin Park ◽  
Kyu Joo Park ◽  
Jae-Gahb Park ◽  
Kuhn Uk Lee ◽  
Kuk Jin Choe ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document