Postmortem distribution of α-pyrrolidinovalerophenone and its metabolite in body fluids and solid tissues in a fatal poisoning case measured by LC–MS–MS with the standard addition method

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koutaro Hasegawa ◽  
Osamu Suzuki ◽  
Amin Wurita ◽  
Kayoko Minakata ◽  
Itaru Yamagishi ◽  
...  
2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koutaro Hasegawa ◽  
Amin Wurita ◽  
Kayoko Minakata ◽  
Kunio Gonmori ◽  
Hideki Nozawa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Koutaro Hasegawa ◽  
Kayoko Minakata ◽  
Masasko Suzuki ◽  
Osamu Suzuki

Abstract Purpose In the quantitative forensic toxicological analyses using instruments, major methods to be employed are conventional matrix-matched calibration method (MMCM). However, nowadays, the needs for using the standard addition methods (SAM) are increasing. In spite of this situation, there are no reports of the guidelines for the validations of SAM. In this review, the principle, how to perform it, advantages, disadvantages, reported application data, and the details of validation procedures for the SAM are described. Methods Various databases such as SciFinder, Google and Google Scholar were utilized to collect relevant reports referring to the SAM. The long experiences of our research group on the SAM were also included in this review. Results Although the experimental procedures for the SAM are much more laborious than those of the MMCM, the SAM is essential to quantify target xenobiotic(s) in special matrices such as human solid tissues or biles, which remarkably interfere with the usual quantitative analyses. The validation methods for the SAM have been also proposed for the cases in the absence of the blank matrices. Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first presentation of detailed SAM procedure and its validation, which will facilitate the use of the SAM in forensic toxicology. Especially for its validation, new simple methods have been proposed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document