Cabozantinib After a Previous Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-501
Author(s):  
Roberto Iacovelli ◽  
Chiara Ciccarese ◽  
Gaetano Facchini ◽  
Michele Milella ◽  
Federica Urbano ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 318-318
Author(s):  
Chiara Ciccarese ◽  
Roberto Iacovelli ◽  
Emilio Bria ◽  
Giovanni Schinzari ◽  
Ernesto Rossi ◽  
...  

318 Background: Combinations of a PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) with a VEGFR-TKI as front-line/treatment-naïve therapy significantly improve the outcome of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients. The benefit of these combinations is well evident in IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk population, while it is unclear in the subgroup of mRCC patients with favorable prognosis. We performed a meta-analysis with the aim to evaluate whether the addition of ICIs to VEGFR-TKIs is able to improve the outcome compared to VEGFR-TKIs alone in mRCC patients with favorable IMDC prognosis. Methods: This meta-analysis searched MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Library and ASCO Meeting abstracts for phase II or III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing the combination of VEGFR-TKI+ICI in mRCC. Data extraction was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. The hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS with the relative 95% CIs were extracted from each study. Summary HRs was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. Results: Three RCTs were selected for the final analysis, with a total of 605 patients (306 treated with VEGFR-TKI+ICI combinations and 299 who received sunitinib in the control arms). The combination of VEGFR-TKI+ICI improved PFS compared to sunitinib, with a 30% reduction of the risk of progression (fixed-effect, HR=0.70; p = 0.003). However, VEGFR-TKI+ICI combinations did not significantly prolong OS (fixed-effect; HR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.62–1.43; p = 0.77). Conclusions: Our analysis demonstrates a PFS benefit without an OS advantage for VEGFR-TKI+ICI combinations as first-line therapy for mRCC patients with favourable prognosis according to IMDC. Longer follow-up is required to definitely confirm the best therapy for treatment-naïve mRCC patients with favorable prognosis. [Table: see text]


Author(s):  
Hiroki Ishihara ◽  
Toshio Takagi ◽  
Tsunenori Kondo ◽  
Hironori Fukuda ◽  
Hidekazu Tachibana ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Studies assessing outcome improvements over a long period according to systemic therapy strategies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma using real-world data, including the results of the recent era of immune checkpoint inhibitors, are limited. Herein, we retrospectively evaluated patients who were diagnosed with metastatic renal cell carcinoma over a 40-year span. Methods Patients were classified into four groups based on when their metastases were diagnosed as follows: (i) the pre-cytokine era (1980–1986), (ii) the cytokine era (1987–2007), (iii) the molecular-targeted therapy (mTT) era (2008 to August 2016) and (iv) the immune checkpoint inhibitor era (September 2016 to 2018). The immune checkpoint inhibitor era consisted of second- or later-line nivolumab. Overall survival from the diagnoses of metastases was evaluated. Results In total, 576 patients were evaluated, including 22 (3.82%), 231 (40.1%), 253 (43.9%) and 70 (12.2%) patients from the pre-cytokine, cytokine, molecular-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor eras, respectively. The overall survival significantly improved with each successive era (median: 13.1 vs. 24.5 vs. 44.4 months vs. not reached in pre-cytokine vs. cytokine vs. molecular-targeted therapy vs. immune checkpoint inhibitor eras, P < 0.0001). The implementation of molecular-targeted therapy improved overall survival compared with that of cytokine (cytokine vs. molecular-targeted therapy eras, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the era was an independent factor for overall survival (P < 0.0001), together with histopathological type; metastasis status (i.e. synchronous or metachronous); systemic therapy status (i.e. absence or presence) and bone, liver or lymph node metastasis status (all, P < 0.05). Conclusion This retrospective study of real-world data indicated that metastatic renal cell carcinoma outcomes improved with successive systemic therapy paradigms.


JAMA Oncology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
pp. 1631 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Braun ◽  
Yuko Ishii ◽  
Alice M. Walsh ◽  
Eliezer M. Van Allen ◽  
Catherine J. Wu ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 2875
Author(s):  
Yoshiyuki Matsui

In patients with renal cell carcinoma, brain metastasis is generally one of the poor prognostic factors. However, the recent introduction of molecular target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor has remarkably advanced the systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and prolonged the patients’ survival. The pivotal clinical trials of those agents usually excluded patients with brain metastasis. The incidence of brain metastasis has been increasing in the actual clinical setting because of longer control of extra-cranial disease. Brain metastasis subgroup data from the prospective and retrospective series have been gradually accumulated about the risk classification of brain metastasis and the efficacy and safety of those new agents for brain metastasis. While the local treatment against brain metastasis includes neurosurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and conventional whole brain radiation therapy, the technology of stereotactic radiosurgery has been especially advanced, and the combination with systemic therapy such as molecular target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor is considered promising. This review summarizes recent progression of multimodality treatment of brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma from literature data and explores the future direction of the treatment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document