Pitfalls and Caveats in Applying Immunostaining to Histopathological Diagnosis

Immunostaining is an essential histochemical technique for analyzing pathogenesis and making a histopathological diagnosis. The needs are prompted by technical development and refinement, commercial availability of a variety of antibodies, deepened knowledge of immunohistochemical markers, accelerated analysis of morphofunctional correlations, progress in molecular target therapy, and the expectation of advanced histopathological diagnosis. However, immunostaining does have various pitfalls and caveats. We should learn from mistakes and failures, as well as from false positivity and false negativity. The present review article describes various devices, technical hints and trouble-shooting guides to keep in mind in performing immunostaining.

HGG-51. PAIRED EPITHELIOID GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENT DERIVED XENOGRAFT MODELS WITH/WITHOUT MOLECULAR TARGET THERAPY

Epithelioid glioblastoma (E-GBM) predominantly arises at younger age and promotes dismal prognosis. Because of its rare etiology, pathological and genetical characterization of E-GBM remains elusive. Herein, we report 2 patient-derived E-GBM xenograft (PDX) models from young adult patients (YMG62 and YMG89) with BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutation. The YMG62 patient received dabrafenib with trametinib, while YMG89 patient received dabrafenib monotherapy after recurrence with Stupp regimen. These molecular target therapies were initially responded, but gradually became resistant (YMG62R and YMG89R) and resulted in lethal. Treatment resistant cells were collected from CSF. These primary cells were propagated at multiple passage in vitro. Paired PDX models were established from initial and recurrent cells. All PDX tumors were preferentially disseminated and negative expression of GFAP, which were recapitulated to the patient characteristics. BRAF and MEK inhibitor moderately suppressed cell viability of YMG62 and YMG89 in vitro. However, BRAF and MEK inhibitor became resistant at recurrence in vitro. Western blotting indicated retained phospho-MEK expression after BRAF/MEK inhibitor treatment in recurrent cells, which implies crucial role of MEK activation for tumor maintenance in BRAFV600E mutant E-GBM. Together, paired E-GBM PDX models with/without molecular target therapy recapitulate patient characteristics, which may contribute to elucidate tumor biology and establish novel therapeutic target in E-GBM.

SPDR-01 Paired epithelioid glioblastoma patient-derived xenograft models to evaluate resistant mechanism for molecular target therapy

Epithelioid glioblastoma (E-GBM) arises at younger age, commonly disseminates to cerebrospinal fluid, and results in dismal prognosis. About half of E-GBM harbors BRAF V600E mutation, thus BRAF/MEK inhibitors are expected to be specifically sensitive to E-GBM like other BRAF V600E mutant carcinomas. However, therapeutic effect is limited by the emergence of drug resistance. To overcome this issue, it is crucial to elucidate the treatment resistance mechanisms by clinically representative models. Herein, we establish 2 paired E-GBM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models from young adult patients (YMG62 and YMG89) with BRAF V600E, TERT promoter mutations and CDKN2A homozygous deletions. The YMG62 patient received dabrafenib with trametinib, while YMG89 patient received dabrafenib monotherapy after recurrence with standard treatment. The YMG62 patient was refractory to combination therapy. The YMG89 patient was initially responded to dabrafenib, but gradually became resistant and the 2 patients died due to CNS dissemination. Paired PDX models were established from tumors prior and after molecular target therapy. All PDXs were formed as CNS dissemination model, which were recapitulated to the patient characteristics. BRAF/MEK inhibitors strongly suppressed cell viability in primary tumor (YMG89P). However, BRAF/MEK inhibitors became resistant in recurrent tumor (YMG89R). YMG62 paired PDXs were resistant to molecular target therapy. Western blotting indicated retained MAPK signaling pathway and/or increased AKT phosphorylation after BRAF/MEK inhibitors treatment in refractory and recurrent cells, which indicates crucial role of re-activation in the MAPK signaling pathway and/or PI3 kinase pathway for tumor maintenance in BRAF V600E mutant E-GBM. We have done high throughput drug screening to identify compounds to overcome resistant to molecular target therapy. Our established E-GBM paired PDX models recapitulate patient characteristics, which may uncover treatment resistant mechanism and novel therapeutic target in E-GBM.

Current Multimodality Treatments against Brain Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma

In patients with renal cell carcinoma, brain metastasis is generally one of the poor prognostic factors. However, the recent introduction of molecular target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor has remarkably advanced the systemic treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma and prolonged the patients’ survival. The pivotal clinical trials of those agents usually excluded patients with brain metastasis. The incidence of brain metastasis has been increasing in the actual clinical setting because of longer control of extra-cranial disease. Brain metastasis subgroup data from the prospective and retrospective series have been gradually accumulated about the risk classification of brain metastasis and the efficacy and safety of those new agents for brain metastasis. While the local treatment against brain metastasis includes neurosurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and conventional whole brain radiation therapy, the technology of stereotactic radiosurgery has been especially advanced, and the combination with systemic therapy such as molecular target therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor is considered promising. This review summarizes recent progression of multimodality treatment of brain metastasis of renal cell carcinoma from literature data and explores the future direction of the treatment.