scholarly journals Correction to: Liquid Biopsy for Prognosis and Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Circulating Tumor Cells vs Circulating Tumor DNA

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Patelli ◽  
Caterina Vaghi ◽  
Federica Tosi ◽  
Gianluca Mauri ◽  
Alessio Amatu ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Germano ◽  
Gianluca Mauri ◽  
Giulia Siravegna ◽  
Caroline Dive ◽  
Jackie Pierce ◽  
...  

Biomedicines ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Vacante ◽  
Roberto Ciuni ◽  
Francesco Basile ◽  
Antonio Biondi

Currently, there is a crucial need for novel diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers with high specificity and sensitivity in patients with colorectal cancer. A “liquid biopsy” is characterized by the isolation of cancer-derived components, such as circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, and proteins, from peripheral blood or other body fluids and their genomic or proteomic assessment. The liquid biopsy is a minimally invasive and repeatable technique that could play a significant role in screening and diagnosis, and predict relapse and metastasis, as well as monitoring minimal residual disease and chemotherapy resistance in colorectal cancer patients. However, there are still some practical issues that need to be addressed before liquid biopsy can be widely used in clinical practice. Potential challenges may include low amounts of circulating tumor cells and circulating tumor DNA in samples, lack of pre-analytical and analytical consensus, clinical validation, and regulatory endorsement. The aim of this review was to summarize the current knowledge of the role of liquid biopsy in the management of colorectal cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3506-3506
Author(s):  
Andrea Sartore-Bianchi ◽  
Filippo Pietrantonio ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Benedetta Mussolin ◽  
Francesco Rua ◽  
...  

3506 Background: Despite advances in molecular segmentation of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), beyond RAS status therapeutic actionability remains confined to the limited subgroups of ERBB2 amplified, BRAF mutated and MSI-H patients. Optimization of available treatments is therefore warranted. Rechallenge with anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies is often empirically used with some benefit as late-line therapy. We previously found that mutant RAS and EGFR ectodomain clones, which emerge in blood during EGFR blockade, decline upon antibody withdrawal leading to regain drug sensitivity. Based on this rationale, we designed CHRONOS, a multicenter phase II trial of anti-EGFR therapy rechallenge guided by monitoring of the mutational status of RAS, BRAF and EGFR in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). To our knowledge, this is the first interventional clinical trial of liquid biopsy for driving anti-EGFR rechallenge therapy in mCRC. Methods: Eligible patients were PS ECOG 0-2 RAS/BRAF WT mCRC having first achieved an objective response and then progression in any treatment line with an anti-EGFR antibody containing regimen, displaying RAS, BRAF and EGFR ectodomain WT status in ctDNA at molecular screening after progression to the last anti-EGFR-free regimen. Clonal evolution in ctDNA was analyzed by ddPCR and next generation sequencing. Panitumumab 6 mg/kg was administered IV every two weeks until progression. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST version 1.1 with independent central review. 27 total patients and 6 responses were required to declare the study positive (power = 85%, type I error = 0.05). Results: Between Aug 19, 2019 and Nov 6, 2020 52 patients were screened by liquid biopsy and 36 (69%) were negative in ctDNA for RAS/BRAF/EGFR mutations. Of these, 27 patients were enrolled in 4 centers. Median age was 64 years (range: 42-80). PS ECOG was 0/50%, 1/46%, 2/4%. Previous anti-EGFR was administered in 1st line in 63%, 2nd in 15% and > 2nd in 22%. Median number of previous treatments was 3. The primary endpoint was met, with 8/27 partial responses (PR) observed (2 unconfirmed) (ORR = 30%, 95% CI: 12-47%). Stable disease (SD) was obtained in 11/27 (40%, 95% CI: 24-59%), lasting > 4 months in 8/11. Disease control rate (PR plus SD > 4 months) was therefore obtained in 16/27 (59%, 95% CI: 41-78%). Median progression-free survival was 16 weeks. Median duration of response was 17 weeks (1 ongoing). Maximal grade toxicity was G3, limited to dermatological and occurring in 19% of patients. ctDNA dynamics were studied in all patients. Conclusions: Liquid biopsy-driven rechallenge with anti-EGFR antibodies leads to further objective responses in one third of patients. Genotyping tumor DNA in the blood to direct therapy can be effectively incorporated in the management of advanced CRCs. Clinical trial information: 2016-002597-12.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14753-e14753
Author(s):  
Stephanie Shishido ◽  
Peter Kuhn

e14753 Background: The liquid biopsy is a noninvasive route to evaluate circulating tumor cells (CTCs) during the course of treatment to gain understanding of tumor biology, with potential prognostic utility. CTCs could serve as a predictive biomarker while aiding in the identification of resistance mechanisms to treatment through single cell genomic and proteomic analysis providing a longitudinal snapshots of tumor heterogeneity. Methods: Through the use of the high definition single cell assay (HD-SCA) workflow, we characterized the rare circulating cells to determine prognostic value of the liquid biopsy in monitoring the efficacy of andecaliximab in a combinational treatment as 1st or 2nd line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). 174 samples from 95 patients were analyzed to determine the significance of CTCs during treatment. Results: HD-CTCs were detected in 31% of samples, with 41 (43%) patients being CTC positive in at least 1 timepoint during the study. Patients receiving 1st line therapy presented with a median of 0 (range 0-346.04) and a mean of 9.49 (±14.06) HD-CTC/mL at baseline (BL). At initiation of 2nd line therapy, patients presented with a median of 0 HD-CTC/mL (range 0-277.37) and a mean of 10.94 (±15.32). There was no association between BL HD-CTC/mL and response, but for the 20 patients with > 1 HD-CTC at BL, there was a trend toward response for higher HD-CTC/mL (non-response: mean 2.8, n = 12; response: mean 89.7, n = 8; p = .04). The 3 patients with > 10 HD-CTC/mL at BL had undetectable HD-CTC on-treatment, which accompanied radiologic partial response; however, the 2 patients with complete radiological response had no HD-CTC detected at BL. In case studies, treatment pressure led to an observable change in HD-CTC morphology and genomic instability (single cell CNV analysis), suggesting these parameters may inform prognosis. Conclusions: Characterization of CTCs from patients with mCRC is feasible and may provide prognostic information to guide clinical decision making. Further evaluation of CTCs for pharmacodynamics and clinical monitoring in patients with mCRC is warranted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15574-e15574
Author(s):  
Mohamed Bouchahda ◽  
Raphael Saffroy ◽  
Abdoulaye Karaboué ◽  
Jocelyne Hamelin ◽  
Pasquale Innominato ◽  
...  

e15574 Background: This pilot study aimed at the evaluation of the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in patients with initially RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, whose liquid biopsy found no RAS mutation after prior chemotherapy failure. Methods: Sixteen patients with RAS-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer in the solid tumor were included, after they had received 1 to 3 prior chemotherapy lines without anti-EGFR. Before inclusion, RAS genotyping was performed in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from liquid biopsy, after a median duration of ̃24 months after the initial RAS status determination. No RAS mutation was detected in the circulating tumor DNA from 9 patients (56%), who then received cetuximab-FOLFIRI. The 7 patients who had persistent RAS mutation in the liquid biopsy (44%) were treated according to standard recommendations without anti-EGFR. Results: The median progression free survival was 8.2 months [95%CL, 4.5 – 11.8] in patients without detectable ctDNA RAS mutation, as compared to 3.5 months [2.1 – 4.9] in the ctDNA mutated patients (p < 0.001). The median overall survival was 22.3 months [17.3 - 27.3] in the patients with undetectable ctDNA RAS mutation, whereas it was 4.7 months [2.6 - 6.7] in those with ctDNA RAS mutation (p = 0.013). These results suggested the efficacy of cetuximab-based chemotherapy in patients with initially RAS mutated metastatic colorectal cancer, who later displayed no detectable ctDNA RAS mutation. Conclusions: The introduction of an anti-EGFR could provide an additional treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with apparent conversion of initial RAS mutation, based on ctDNA assessment after prior failure on anti-EGFR-free chemotherapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document