scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid compared with sequential denosumab/alendronate for older osteoporotic women in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Mori ◽  
Carolyn J. Crandall ◽  
Tomoko Fujii ◽  
David A. Ganz
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Zoledronic Acid ◽  
Cost Saving ◽  
Fragility Fracture ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Summary Among hypothetical cohorts of older osteoporotic women without prior fragility fracture in Japan, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of two treatment strategies using a simulation model. Annual intravenous zoledronic acid for 3 years was cost-saving compared with biannual subcutaneous denosumab for 3 years followed by weekly oral alendronate for 3 years. Purpose Osteoporosis constitutes a major medical and health economic burden to society worldwide. Injectable treatments for osteoporosis require less frequent administration than oral treatments and therefore have higher persistence and adherence with treatment, which could explain better efficacy for fracture prevention. Although annual intravenous zoledronic acid and biannual subcutaneous denosumab are available, it remains unclear which treatment strategy represents a better value from a health economic perspective. Accordingly, we examined the cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid for 3 years compared with sequential denosumab/alendronate (i.e., denosumab for 3 years followed by oral weekly alendronate for 3 years, making the total treatment duration 6 years) among hypothetical cohorts of community-dwelling osteoporotic women without prior fragility fracture in Japan at ages 65, 70, 75, or 80 years. Methods Using a previously validated and updated Markov microsimulation model, we obtained incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (Japanese yen [¥] (or US dollars [$]) per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) from the public healthcare and long-term care payer’s perspective over a lifetime horizon with a willingness-to-pay of ¥5 million (or $47,500) per QALY. Results In the base case, zoledronic acid was cost-saving (i.e., more effective and less expensive) compared with sequential denosumab/alendronate. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, results were sensitive to changes in the efficacy of zoledronic acid or the cumulative persistence rate with zoledronic acid or denosumab. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the probabilities of zoledronic acid being cost-effective were 98–100%. Conclusions Among older osteoporotic women without prior fragility fracture in Japan, zoledronic acid was cost-saving compared with sequential denosumab/alendronate.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of sequential daily teriparatide/weekly alendronate compared with alendronate monotherapy for older osteoporotic women with prior vertebral fracture in Japan

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takahiro Mori ◽  
Carolyn J. Crandall ◽  
Tomoko Fujii ◽  
David A. Ganz
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Base Case ◽  
Microsimulation Model ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Summary Using a Markov microsimulation model among hypothetical cohorts of community-dwelling older osteoporotic Japanese women with prior vertebral fracture over a lifetime horizon, we found that daily subcutaneous teriparatide for 2 years followed by weekly oral alendronate for 8 years was not cost-effective compared with alendronate monotherapy for 10 years. Purpose Teriparatide has proven efficacy in reducing osteoporotic fractures, but with substantial cost. We examined the cost-effectiveness of sequential teriparatide/alendronate (i.e., daily subcutaneous teriparatide for 2 years followed by weekly oral alendronate for 8 years) compared with alendronate monotherapy for 10 years among community-dwelling older osteoporotic women with prior clinical or morphometric vertebral fracture in Japan. Methods Using a previously validated and updated Markov microsimulation model, we obtained incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (Japanese yen [¥] (or US dollars [$]) per quality-adjusted life year [QALY]) from the perspective of a single payer responsible for both public healthcare and long-term care. We assumed a lifetime horizon with a willingness-to-pay of ¥5million (or $47,500) per QALY in the base case. We modeled the cost of biosimilar teriparatide, which has been available since November 2019 in Japan, assuming the efficacy was the same as that of the brand version. Results In the base case, sequential teriparatide/alendronate was not cost-effective compared with alendronate monotherapy. In deterministic sensitivity analyses, sequential teriparatide/alendronate would become cost-effective with 85%, 50%, and 15% price discounts to teriparatide at ages 70, 75, and 80, respectively, compared to the current biosimilar cost. Otherwise, results were especially sensitive to changes that affected efficacy of teriparatide or alendronate. In probabilistic sensitivity analyses, the probabilities of sequential teriparatide/alendronate being cost-effective were 0%, 1%, and 37% at ages 70, 75, and 80, respectively. Conclusions Among high-risk osteoporotic women in Japan, sequential teriparatide/alendronate was not cost-effective compared with alendronate monotherapy, even with the availability of biosimilar teriparatide.

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of teduglutide in adult patients with short bowel syndrome: Markov modeling using traditional cost-effectiveness criteria

2019 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vikram K Raghu ◽  
David G Binion ◽  
Kenneth J Smith
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Saving ◽  
Short Bowel Syndrome ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Short Bowel ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

ABSTRACT Background Adults with short bowel syndrome have a high mortality and significant morbidity due to unsuccessful attempts at rehabilitation that necessitate chronic use of parenteral nutrition (PN). Teduglutide is a novel therapy that promotes intestinal adaptation to improve rehabilitation but with a price >$400,000/y. Objective The current study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of using teduglutide in US adult patients with short bowel syndrome. Methods A Markov model evaluated the costs (in US dollars) and effectiveness (in quality-adjusted life years, or QALYs) of treatment compared with no teduglutide use, with a presumed starting age of 40 y. Parameters were obtained from published data or estimation. The primary effect modeled was the increased likelihood of reduced PN days per week when using teduglutide, leading to greater quality of life and lower PN costs. Sensitivity analyses were performed on all model parameters. Results In the base scenario, teduglutide cost $949,910/QALY gained. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, only reducing teduglutide cost decreased the cost/QALY gained to below the typical threshold of $100,000/QALY gained. Specifically, teduglutide cost would need to be reduced by >65% for it to reach the threshold value. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis favored no teduglutide use in 80% of iterations at a $100,000/QALY threshold. However, teduglutide therapy was cost-saving in 13% of model iterations. Conclusions Teduglutide does not meet a traditional cost-effectiveness threshold as treatment for PN reduction in adult patients with short bowel syndrome compared with standard intestinal rehabilitation. Subpopulations that demonstrate maximum benefit could be cost-saving, and complete nonuse could lead to financial loss. Teduglutide becomes economically reasonable only if its cost is substantially reduced.

Health economic impact of breast cancer index (BCI) in patients with hormone responsive breast cancer (HRBC) considering extended adjuvant endocrine therapy (EET).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (8_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Tara Beth Sanft ◽  
Alyssa Berkowitz ◽  
Brock Schroeder ◽  
Christos Hatzis ◽  
Catherine A. Schnabel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Breast Cancer Index ◽  
The Cost

25 Background: Previous research has demonstrated the benefit of EET for HRBC, however, the absolute benefit is modest and commits women to an extra 5 yrs of treatment. The Breast Cancer Index (BCI) is a gene expression-based test that has been validated to quantify the risk of late recurrence (BCI subscore) and to predict likelihood of benefit from EET (H/I subscore). We have previously shown that the use of BCI increases patient and physician confidence in decision-making and leads to fewer recommendations for EET. The current analysis extends our results to a larger sample size and presents a health economic analysis to assess the cost effectiveness of the use of BCI for EET decision-making. Methods: We developed a fact-based economic model to project the cost effectiveness of BCI using a cohort of 140 patients with stage I-III HRBC from Yale Cancer Center and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center who had completed ≥3.5 yrs of endocrine therapy and had undergone BCI testing in the context of this study. Physicians completed questionnaires to indicate their recommendations for EET before and after BCI results. Costs associated with EET, toxicity, follow-up, and metastatic recurrence were modeled over 5 yrs of extended therapy. Model inputs were based on published literature. Sensitivity analyses were performed around key inputs to estimate effects on the model. Results: Changes in EET recommendations after BCI were observed in 29% of patients, with 21% changing from recommended to not recommended, and 8% from not recommended to recommended. The projected net cost savings of BCI testing in this population of patients who are disease free at 5 yrs post-diagnosis is $5,190 per patient tested. Gross cost savings were projected to be achieved through reduced recurrence in patients receiving EET based on BCI results and decreased adverse events and comorbidities for patients with low BCI scores who did not receive EET. Conclusions: Based on the decision impact of BCI in a real-world cohort, the test is projected to be cost saving for women with early stage hormone receptor positive breast cancer who are recurrence free at 5 yrs post-diagnosis on adjuvant endocrine therapy.

scholarly journals Modelling the Economic Impact of Reducing Loneliness in Community Dwelling Older People in England

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 1426
Author(s):  
David McDaid ◽  
A-La Park
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Saving ◽  
Older People ◽  
Social Care ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Social Activities ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
Health And Social Care

Loneliness has been associated with poor mental health and wellbeing. In England, a 2018 national strategy on loneliness was published, and public health guidelines recommend participation in social activities. In the absence of existing economic evidence, we modelled the potential cost effectiveness of a service that connects lonely older people to social activities against no-intervention. A 5-year Markov model was constructed from a health and social care perspective. Parameters were drawn from the literature, with the intervention structure based on an existing loneliness alleviation programme implemented in several settings across England. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken. The total expected cost per participant in the intervention group is £7131 compared to £6783 in the usual care group with 0.45 loneliness free years (LFY) gained. The incremental cost per LFY gained is £768; in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis the intervention is cost saving in 3.5% of iterations. Potentially such interventions may be cost-effective but are unlikely to be cost-saving even allowing for sustained effects and cumulative adverse health and social care events averted. Empirical studies are needed to determine the cost-effectiveness of these interventions, ideally mapping changes in loneliness to the quality of life, in order to allow the key metric in health economic studies, cost per quality adjusted life year to be estimated.

Cost-effectiveness of next-generation sequencing minimal residual disease testing during maintenance treatment for multiple myeloma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19529-e19529 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josh John Carlson ◽  
Benjamin Eckert ◽  
Marita Zimmerman
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Health State ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
System Perspective ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

e19529 Background: MRD testing is part of the response evaluation criteria for MM, and clinical guidelines recommend MRD testing with technologies that detect malignant cells at a level of at least 1/100,000. Deep MRD negativity correlates with improved health outcomes for MM pts, and MRD status may inform treatment (tx) continuation decisions during MM maintenance therapy. We evaluated the potential cost-effectiveness of NGS MRD (clonoSEQ) vs. no MRD testing in the maintenance MM setting. Methods: We developed a Markov model with 6 health states: MRD+ or MRD- on or off tx, relapsed, or dead and compared yearly NGS MRD to no MRD testing over a lifetime horizon. The model assumed tx stops after an MRD- result; otherwise, tx continued until disease progression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) data for MRD- and MRD+ and hazard ratios for on/off tx were applied based on peer-reviewed literature. MRD- pts were assumed to have the same PFS/OS rates on and off tx, which were varied in sensitivity analyses. On tx, 2%/month of MRD+ pts became MRD-. Health state utilities were based on peer-reviewed literature and included an adverse event (AE) disutility. The cost of NGS MRD was $1,800 + $1,836 for specimen collection, with maintenance tx at $21,168/month and tx for relapsed pts at $27,422/month. We used a US health system perspective and a 3% discount rate. Results: MRD testing saved $1,156,600 over patients remaining lifetime. Health outcomes were similar and slightly favored MRD testing vs no testing (0.01 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) from lower AE risk over time, suggesting a potentially dominant strategy, i.e., less costly with improved health outcomes. This result was most sensitive to the probability of MRD+ to MRD- transition and the cost of maintenance tx. Conclusions: NGS MRD testing is cost-saving, with potential QALY gains due to avoidance of tx-related AEs compared with no testing for MM patients on maintenance therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the health outcomes of MRD testing during MM maintenance tx. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of group-based exercise to prevent falls in elderly community-dwelling people

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Scheckel ◽  
Stephanie Stock ◽  
Dirk Müller
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Older People ◽  
Fall Prevention ◽  
Impact Analysis ◽  
Balance Training ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Background Clinical studies indicate that strength-balance training for active fall prevention can prevent fractures in older people. The present modelling study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of fall prevention exercise (FPE) provided to independently living older people compared to no intervention in Germany. Method We designed a Markov model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a group-based FPE-program provided to independently living people ≥75 years from the perspective of the German statutory health insurance (SHI). Input data was obtained from public databases, clinical trials and official statistics. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was presented as costs per avoided hip fracture. Additionally, we performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses and, estimated monetary consequences for the SHI in a budget impact analysis (BIA). Results For women, the costs per hip fracture avoided amounted to €52,864 (men: €169,805). Results of deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results. According to the BIA, for the reimbursement of FPE additional costs of €3.0 million (women) and €7.8 million (men) are expected for the SHI. Conclusions Group-based FPE appears to be no cost-effective option to prevent fall-related hip fractures in independently living elderly. To allow a more comprehensive statement on the cost effectiveness of FPE fracture types other than hip should be increasingly evaluated in clinical trials.

scholarly journals The cost effectiveness of aging in place: A literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 40-54
Author(s):  
Nguyen Tan Loi ◽  
Nguyen Tien Dung ◽  
Ho Nhut Quang
Keyword(s):  
Health Economic ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Assisted Living ◽  
Social Life ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Economic Valuation ◽  
Aging In Place ◽  
Term Care ◽  
The Cost

The objective of this paper is to discover the evidence supporting or refuting the cost-effectiveness of Assisted Living Technology (ALT) in aging in place of older adults through a comprehensive presentation of cost studies and economic analyses. The search was conducted on two main databases for health economic valuation: The NHS economic valuation database (NHS EED) and the health economic valuation database (HEED). The study was evaluated using the protocol required by Campbell and Cochrane Economic Methods. As an aging society evolves, the need for long-term care services increases. The prevalence of chronic diseases increases in the older population; seniors may have to abandon their bative social life and need long-term care in a nursing home. Aging is a global phenomenon. Asia is aging rapidly. By 2030, the number of Asians aged 65 and over will increase from the current 300 million to 565 million. By 2050, this number will increase to 900 million, about one-sixth of the number of people in Asia. Aging trends are regional, but demographic changes are diverse. Countries such as Japan, South Korea, Singapore, and China, whose populations are steadily aging, are in extreme situations. Research has shown that ALT can reduce costs in some cases, but with little precise data and low quality. Later developments, e.g., capacity methods, should be used for further research. Qualitative research is needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of ALT before making reliable conclusions about the application.

scholarly journals Assessing cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C testing pathways in Georgia using the Hep C Testing Calculator

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Madeline Adee ◽  
Yueran Zhuo ◽  
Huaiyang Zhong ◽  
Tiannan Zhan ◽  
Rakesh Aggarwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Hepatitis C ◽  
Cost Saving ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Soc Testing ◽  
Program Costs ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Hcv Testing

AbstractThe cost of testing can be a substantial contributor to hepatitis C virus (HCV) elimination program costs in many low- and middle-income countries such as Georgia, resulting in the need for innovative and cost-effective strategies for testing. Our objective was to investigate the most cost-effective testing pathways for scaling-up HCV testing in Georgia. We developed a Markov-based model with a lifetime horizon that simulates the natural history of HCV, and the cost of detection and treatment of HCV. We then created an interactive online tool that uses results from the Markov-based model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different HCV testing pathways. We compared the current standard-of-care (SoC) testing pathway and four innovative testing pathways for Georgia. The SoC testing was cost-saving compared to no testing, but all four new HCV testing pathways further increased QALYs and decreased costs. The pathway with the highest patient follow-up, due to on-site testing, resulted in the highest discounted QALYs (123 QALY more than the SoC) and lowest costs ($127,052 less than the SoC) per 10,000 persons screened. The current testing algorithm in Georgia can be replaced with a new pathway that is more effective while being cost-saving.

Cost-Utility of Tiotropium in Patients With Severe Asthma

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jefferson Antonio Buendia ◽  
Diana Guerrero Patino
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Severe Asthma ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Inhaled Corticosteroids ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Base Case ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost

Abstract BackgroundAn important proportion of asthma patients remain uncontrolled despite the use of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists. Some add-on therapies, as tiotropium bromide have been recommended for this subgroup of patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of tiotropium as add-on therapies to ICS + LABA for patients with severe asthma. Methods A probabilistic Markov model was created to estimate the cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of patients with severe asthma in Colombia. Total costs and QALYS of two interventions including standard therapy (ICS + LABA), add-on therapy with tiotropium, were calculated over a lifetime horizon. Multiple sensitivity analyses were conducted. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay value of $19,000. ResultsThe model suggests a potential gain of 1.06 QALYs per patient per year on tiotropium, with a difference of US$ 478 in favor of tiotropium; showing dominance respect to standard therapy. A position of dominance negates the need to calculate an incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio. In the deterministic sensitivity analyses, our base‐case results were robust to variations of all assumptions and parameters Conclusion Add-on therapy with tiotropium was found to be cost-effective when added to usual care in patients who remain uncontrolled despite treatment with medium or high-dose ICS/LABA. Our study provides evidence that should be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines and should be replicated to validate their results in other middle-income countries.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20703-e20703
Author(s):  
Ashley Kim ◽  
Beth Devine ◽  
Joshua A. Roth
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Base Case ◽  
First Line ◽  
Lifetime Horizon ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Tumor Expression ◽  
The Cost

e20703 Background: Trial results from KEYNOTE-407 have recently led to the FDA approval for pembrolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel/nab-paclitaxel (pembrolizumab+chemo) in previously untreated metastatic squamous NSCLC. This is the only first-line indication for squamous NSCLC regardless of tumor expression status. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab combination therapy in this setting from the US payer perspective. Methods: Using data from KEYNOTE-407, we developed a partitioned survival decision model to estimate the lifetime costs and effectiveness of pembrolizumab+chemo vs. chemo alone in the first-line treatment of metastatic squamous NSCLC. The base case used a Weibull curve selected based on minimum AIC/BIC and best graphical fit to extrapolate in-trial survival to a lifetime horizon. First- and second-line therapy resource use and adverse event (AE) rates were derived from KEYNOTE-407. Utility data and AE management were obtained from published literature and national sources. Direct medical costs were adjusted to 2018 US dollars, and future costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% per year. We estimated life years (LY), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and costs over a lifetime horizon. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also conducted. Results: In the base case, pembrolizumab+chemo resulted in 0.51 more LYs, 0.36 more QALYs, and $233,246 in healthcare costs vs. chemo alone. Costs per LY and QALY gained were $216,180 and $309,004, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were most sensitive to survival and pre-progression utility inputs. In a threshold analysis, we found that the cost of pembrolizumab+chemo would need to be reduced by 24% per course of therapy ($176,175) in order to be cost-effective at $150,000/QALY. Conclusions: Based on current available data, our analysis suggests first-line pembrolizumab-based combination therapy in metastatic squamous NSCLC is unlikely to be cost-effective relative to implied willingness to pay in cancer in the U.S. (ie < $150,000 per QALY). Future studies should reassess cost-effectiveness as trial data mature.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document