Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Registry-Based Studies of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Systematic Review

IntroductionType 2 diabetes is a global health priority. People with diabetes are more likely to experience mental health problems relative to people without diabetes. Diabetes guidelines recommend assessment of depression and diabetes distress during diabetes care. This systematic review will examine the effect of routinely assessing and addressing depression and diabetes distress using patient-reported outcome measures in improving outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes.Methods and analysisMEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL Complete, PsycInfo, The Cochrane Library and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials will be searched using a prespecified strategy using a prespecified Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes, Setting and study design strategy. The date range of the search of all databases will be from inception to 3 August 2020. Randomised controlled trials, interrupted time-series studies, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, case–control studies and analytical cross-sectional studies published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language will be included. Two review authors will independently screen abstracts and full texts with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer, if required, using Covidence software. Two reviewers will undertake risk of bias assessment using checklists appropriate to study design. Data will be extracted using prespecified template. A narrative synthesis will be conducted, with a meta-analysis, if appropriate.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for this review of published studies. Presentation of results will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidance. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020200246.

Download Full-text

The Re-Engineered Discharge for Diabetes Computer Adaptive Test (REDD-CAT): New patient-reported outcome measures that evaluate social determinants of health for persons with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation ◽

10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.406 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 102 (10) ◽

pp. e6-e7

Author(s):

Noelle Carlozzi ◽

Michael Kallen ◽

Ioana Moldovan ◽

Alexa Bragg ◽

Jessica Howard ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Social Determinants ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Computer Adaptive Test ◽

Adaptive Test ◽

Patient Reported

Download Full-text

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review

Journal of Medical Internet Research ◽

10.2196/25002 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 23 (8) ◽

pp. e25002

Author(s):

Priscilla Jia Ling Wee ◽

Yu Heng Kwan ◽

Dionne Hui Fang Loh ◽

Jie Kie Phang ◽

Troy H Puar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Measurement Properties ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Patient Reported

Background The management of diabetes is complex. There is growing recognition of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a standardized method of obtaining an outlook on patients’ functional status and well-being. However, no systematic reviews have summarized the studies that investigate the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs. Objective Our aims were to conduct a systematic review of studies investigating the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs by evaluating the methodological quality and overall level of evidence of these PROMs and to categorize them based on the outcome measures assessed. Methods This study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from the Embase, PubMed, and PsychINFO databases. The PROMs were evaluated with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. Results A total of 363 articles evaluating the measurement properties of PROMs for diabetes in the adult population were identified, of which 238 unique PROMs from 248 studies reported in 209 articles were validated in the type 2 diabetes population. PROMs with at least a moderate level of evidence for ≥5 of 9 measurement properties include the Chinese version of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (C-PDQ), Diabetes Self-Management Instrument Short Form (DSMI-20), and Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale in Hong Kong primary care patients (C-ITAS-HK), of which the C-PDQ has a “sufficient (+)” rating for >4 measurement properties. A total of 43 PROMs meet the COSMIN guidelines for recommendation for use. Conclusions This study identified and synthesized evidence for the measurement properties of 238 unique PROMs for patients with type 2 diabetes and categorized the PROMs according to their outcome measures. These findings may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting appropriate high-quality PROMs for clinical practice and research. Trial Registration PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020180978; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020180978.

Download Full-text

Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review (Preprint)

10.2196/preprints.25002 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Priscilla Jia Ling Wee ◽

Yu Heng Kwan ◽

Dionne Hui Fang Loh ◽

Jie Kie Phang ◽

Troy H Puar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Systematic Reviews ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Measurement Properties ◽

Level Of Evidence ◽

Patient Reported

BACKGROUND The management of diabetes is complex. There is growing recognition of the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as a standardized method of obtaining an outlook on patients’ functional status and well-being. However, no systematic reviews have summarized the studies that investigate the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs. OBJECTIVE Our aims were to conduct a systematic review of studies investigating the measurement properties of diabetes PROMs by evaluating the methodological quality and overall level of evidence of these PROMs and to categorize them based on the outcome measures assessed. METHODS This study was guided by the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. Relevant articles were retrieved from the Embase, PubMed, and PsychINFO databases. The PROMs were evaluated with the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments) guidelines. RESULTS A total of 363 articles evaluating the measurement properties of PROMs for diabetes in the adult population were identified, of which 238 unique PROMs from 248 studies reported in 209 articles were validated in the type 2 diabetes population. PROMs with at least a moderate level of evidence for ≥5 of 9 measurement properties include the Chinese version of the Personal Diabetes Questionnaire (C-PDQ), Diabetes Self-Management Instrument Short Form (DSMI-20), and Insulin Treatment Appraisal Scale in Hong Kong primary care patients (C-ITAS-HK), of which the C-PDQ has a “sufficient (+)” rating for >4 measurement properties. A total of 43 PROMs meet the COSMIN guidelines for recommendation for use. CONCLUSIONS This study identified and synthesized evidence for the measurement properties of 238 unique PROMs for patients with type 2 diabetes and categorized the PROMs according to their outcome measures. These findings may assist clinicians and researchers in selecting appropriate high-quality PROMs for clinical practice and research. CLINICALTRIAL PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020180978; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020180978.

Download Full-text

Validation of two generic patient-reported outcome measures in patients with type 2 diabetes

Health and Quality of Life Outcomes ◽

10.1186/1477-7525-5-47 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 5 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 41

Author(s):

Louis S Matza ◽

Kristina S Boye ◽

Nicole Yurgin

Keyword(s):

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Patient Reported

Download Full-text

Dapagliflozin improves treatment satisfaction in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a patient reported outcome study (PRO study)

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome ◽

10.1186/s13098-018-0313-x ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Cited By ~ 7

Author(s):

Hiroki Nakajima ◽

Sadanori Okada ◽

Takako Mohri ◽

Eiichiro Kanda ◽

Naoyuki Inaba ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Treatment Satisfaction ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Outcome Study ◽

Patient Reported

Download Full-text

Psychometric properties of medication adherence instruments in cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review protocol

Systematic Reviews ◽

10.1186/s13643-021-01755-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Henrique Ceretta Oliveira ◽

Daisuke Hayashi Neto ◽

Samantha Dalbosco Lins Carvalho ◽

Rita de Cássia Lopes Barros ◽

Mayza Luzia dos Santos Neves ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Type 2 Diabetes ◽

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Medication Adherence ◽

Cardiovascular Diseases ◽

Measurement Properties ◽

Health Measurement ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract Background The pharmacological treatment of cardiovascular diseases and type 2 diabetes mellitus reduces the risk of cardiovascular events.; however, most patients do not adhere to the treatment. There are several self-reported measures for assessing medication adherence. Identifying the instruments with the best psychometric evidence is essential for selecting an accurate measure. The aim of this study is to critically assess, compare and synthesize the quality of the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures to access medication adherence among patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods This protocol is reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) and the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines. The following databases will be searched: Web of Science, SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, LILACS, PsycINFO and ProQuest. Discussion This review will provide a detailed assessment of the measurement properties of self-reported medication adherence instruments in patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus to support clinical practice and research. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD42019129109.

Download Full-text

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Foot and Ankle Pathologies: A Systematic Review

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm8020146 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

pp. 146 ◽

Cited By ~ 4

Author(s):

Ana Ortega-Avila ◽

Pablo Cervera-Garvi ◽

Laura Ramos-Petersen ◽

Esther Chicharro-Luna ◽

Gabriel Gijon-Nogueron

Keyword(s):

Diabetes Mellitus ◽

Systematic Review ◽

Psychometric Properties ◽

Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽

Patient Reported Outcome ◽

Type I ◽

Foot And Ankle ◽

Foot Health ◽

Patient Reported

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic and complex disease, which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality and affects all age groups. It commonly produces secondary effects on the foot, often making daily activities impossible. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) provide a standardised method of obtaining patients’ outlooks on their functional status and wellbeing. Although many instruments have been proposed for obtaining data on persons with DM whose feet are affected by the disease, in many cases the psychometric properties of the instrument have yet to be established. The principal objective of our review was to identify PROMs specific for patients with DM affecting the foot and ankle and to evaluate the psychometric properties and methodological quality of these instruments. Methods: In this systematic review, we investigate studies (published in English or Spanish) based on the use of one or more PROMs specific to foot and ankle pathologies for patients with DM (type I or II). To do so, the databases PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, PEDro and Google Scholar were searched for studies that analysed psychometric or clinimetric properties in this respect. These were assessed according to Terwee or COSMIN criteria. Results: Of the 1016 studies identified in the initial search, only 11 were finally included in the qualitative review. Analysis according to Terwee and COSMIN criteria showed that the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) presented the greatest number of positive values. Conclusions: The FHSQ is the highest-quality PROM currently available for the foot and ankle, for patients with DM.

Download Full-text