Advances in Supportive Care for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-293
Author(s):  
Joselle Cook ◽  
Mark Litzow
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1079-1109
Author(s):  
Patrick A. Brown ◽  
Bijal Shah ◽  
Anjali Advani ◽  
Patricia Aoun ◽  
Michael W. Boyer ◽  
...  

The NCCN Guidelines for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) focus on the classification of ALL subtypes based on immunophenotype and cytogenetic/molecular markers; risk assessment and stratification for risk-adapted therapy; treatment strategies for Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-positive and Ph-negative ALL for both adolescent and young adult and adult patients; and supportive care considerations. Given the complexity of ALL treatment regimens and the required supportive care measures, the NCCN ALL Panel recommends that patients be treated at a specialized cancer center with expertise in the management of ALL This portion of the Guidelines focuses on the management of Ph-positive and Ph-negative ALL in adolescents and young adults, and management in relapsed settings.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2626-2626
Author(s):  
Daisuke Tomizawa ◽  
Takako Miyamura ◽  
Toshihiko Imamura ◽  
Tomoyuki Watanabe ◽  
Akiko Moriya Saito ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Outcome of infants with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), especially those with rearrangement of MLL (KMT2A) gene (MLL-r), is extremely poor. A strategy to perform allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for all the infants with MLL-r ALL in first remission (1CR) have been tested in the previous Japanese trials MLL96/98/03, however, the improvement was modest. Given the recent evidence of a limited role of HSCT especially in infants lacking poor prognostic factors, efficacy and safety of an intensive chemotherapy and risk stratification to limit HSCT for only infants with high-risk of relapse were evaluated in the JPLSG MLL-10 trial (UMIN000004801). PATIENTS & METHODS: Infants age less than 365 days with ALL were registered in the MLL-10 study and were stratified by their MLL gene status, age at diagnosis, and presence of CNS disease; low-risk (LR), if the patients had germline MLL gene (MLL-g); intermediate-risk (IR), if the patients with MLL-r ALL were age 180 days or older and lack CNS disease; high-risk (HR), if the patients with MLL-r ALL were age <180 days or having CNS disease. All the infants with MLL-r ALL received Interfant induction followed by COG AALL0631 post-remission chemotherapy with modification of adding high-dose cytarabine in early intensification phase. All the HR cases were allocated to HSCT in 1CR. LR cases were treated based on the Japanese MLL96/98 MLL-g chemotherapy. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was evaluated in 3 methods, flowcytometry, PCR of MLL fusion transcripts, and PCR targeting IgH/TCR rearrangements, but were not used to guide therapies. RESULTS: A total of 90 eligible infants with ALL were registered in the MLL-10 study between Jan/2011 and Dec/2014; 15 cases were stratified as LR, 19 as IR, and 56 as HR. Remission status was evaluated after 2 chemotherapy courses; 82 (91.1%) achieved 1CR, 3 failed to achieve 1CR, and 5 discontinued the trial before CR evaluation. No early death was observed. With median follow-up period of 1954 days (range, 534-2835 days) in the live patients, 3-year probability of event-free survival (pEFS) and overall survival (pOS) were 70.9% (95% CI, 60.0-79.3%) and 86.6% (77.6-92.2%), respectively. Among the MLL-r cases, 3-year pEFS and pOS were 66.2% (53.9-75.9%) and 83.9% (73.4-90.5%), respectively. According to the risk groups, 3-year pEFS were 93.3% (61.2-99.0%) for LR, 94.4% (66.6-99.2%) for IR, and 56.6% (42.4-68.6%) for HR cases. Regarding the MRD studies, correlation of MRD results in 3 methodologies seemed reasonable, but while flow-MRD could be evaluated in 85 cases, MLL-fusion PCR-MRD (MLL-r cases only) and IgH/TCR PCR-MRD could only be evaluated in 55 and 50 cases, respectively. In the univariable analysis for MLL-r cases, female sex (P=0.04), younger age at diagnosis (P=0.01), and 0.01%< flow-MRD after 2 courses of chemotherapy (P<0.01) had negative impact on pEFS. In multivariable analysis, female sex (P=0.01) and positive flow-MRD (P<0.01) were poor prognostic. Among the 38 HR cases who received HSCT in 1CR per protocol, 3-year probability of disease-free survival was 65.7% (48.3-78.4%) and only one non-relapse death was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of intensive chemotherapy enabled us to spare allogeneic HSCT in 1CR at least in a subset of infants with MLL-r ALL without compromising their outcome. This was accomplished also because of the aggressive supportive care provided to the study cases, such as full hospitalization during and after the intensive treatment phases, intensive use of rasburicase to prevent tumor lysis syndromes, and aggressive infection prophylaxis. However, outcome of HR MLL-r cases is still unsatisfactory, and introduction of novel agents is mandatory for further improvement in the outcome of infants with ALL. Figure Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1970-1970
Author(s):  
Tamara P. Miller ◽  
Nicholas P. DeGroote ◽  
Lauren Pommert ◽  
Oluwafunbi Awoniyi ◽  
Sarah Board ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Methotrexate (MTX) is a cornerstone of therapy for pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Administration of high dose (HD) MTX requires hospitalization and concurrent intravenous fluids and leucovorin while awaiting drug excretion. HDMTX has been associated with acute adverse events (AEs), such as mucositis, neurotoxicity, and myelosuppression, that can impact quality of life and ability to administer subsequent chemotherapy. There are limited data evaluating differences in AEs after HDMTX among demographic groups. Objective: The objective of this study was to describe AEs for patients receiving HDMTX (defined as &gt;500 mg/m2 to account for dose reductions from protocol dosing) and to compare rates by age, race, ethnicity and dose number using a multicenter cohort. Methods: A multi-center retrospective study collected data on pediatric ALL patients ages 0-21 years at diagnosis who received at least one dose of HDMTX at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta or Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center from January 2010 through December 2020. Demographic (age, sex, race, ethnicity) and clinical (vital status, Down Syndrome, HDMTX doses) variables were manually abstracted from the electronic medical record. Algorithms were developed a priori based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5 to identify the presence and grade of targeted AEs after HDMTX administration. The following AEs were abstracted for the time period from each HDMTX dose until the next HDMTX or other chemotherapy administration: mucositis, neurotoxicity, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia. Only grade 4 neutropenia and grades 3-4 thrombocytopenia were collected. Institutional review board approval was obtained at each site. Descriptive and inferential statistics, including chi-square, Fisher's exact test, and generalized estimating equations (GEE) as appropriate, were calculated to evaluate differences in AEs by dichotomized age (&lt;10, 10+), race, ethnicity, and HDMTX administration number. All analyses were performed using SAS Enterprise Guide v7.1. Results: Across sites, 543 patients with ALL patients received HDMTX (2064 administrations). The median age at first HDMTX was 8.0 years (0.1-21.0); 230 (42.4%) were female, 381 (70.2%) were White, and 441 (81.2%) were Non-Hispanic or Latino (Table 1). The median number of HDMTX administrations was 4.0 (Range 1-10). In total, 469 (86.4%) patients had at least one AE. Mucositis occurred in 386 (71.1%) patients, grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 243 (50.1%) and grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 156 (32.2%, Table 2). Mucositis, neurotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia were significantly more likely in patients 10+ years (p=0.02, p&lt;0.01, p&lt;0.01, respectively, Table 2). There were no significant differences in AE rates by race or ethnicity. Table 3 describes percentages of administrations with each AE grade. Half of HDMTX administrations had at least one AE. AE rates decreased significantly from first to fourth administration (67.5% of first and 33.0% of fourth administrations with at least one AE, p&lt;0.01). Rates of mucositis and neurotoxicity individually decreased over administrations (p&lt;0.01, Table 3). Conclusion: AEs after administration of HDMTX are common, with 86% of patients experiencing at least one AE after receipt of HDMTX and half of administrations leading to at least one AE. Greater than half of patients experienced mucositis and neutropenia. Older patients experienced significantly more mucositis, neurotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia. Unsurprisingly, we found that overall the rate of AEs was highest after the first HDMTX administration and decreased significantly across doses, which is likely due to dose reductions in HDMTX or concurrent antimetabolite therapy and to increased supportive care (hydration and leucovorin) after experience of an AE. Chart abstraction is ongoing at a third hospital that will increase the sample size of patients, particularly those of Hispanic/Latino ethnicity, to delineate potential differences by race and ethnicity. In addition, current analyses are evaluating the impact of supportive care and dosing changes between administrations on the burden of HDMTX-related AEs and differences by age. The results of this study will provide valuable data regarding who is at highest risk for AEs and can be used to tailor supportive care during this potentially toxic chemotherapy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bernhardt: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; BTG International: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Mesoblast: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Servier: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. O'Brien: Jazz: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ramsey: BTG Specialty Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding.


Author(s):  
О. D. Gurieva ◽  
М. I. Savelyeva ◽  
Т. Т. Valiev

Significant progress in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in children has resulted from the development of effective chemoand supportive care therapy protocols. The vector of further research is aimed at reducing toxicity and long-term side effects. The study of pharmacogenetic aspects of toxicity of the main drugs used in the treatment of ALL – methotrexate and 6-mercaptopurine – allowed to identify oligonucleotide polymorphisms that correlate with the concentration of the drug in blood, toxic effects and the risk of relapse of ALL. The clinical administration of pharmacogenetic methods remains a challenging task, requiring additional research, which will make it possible to individualize the ALL therapy on the basis of the results of molecular profiling.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5194-5194
Author(s):  
Yogin B Patel ◽  
Kelsey N Voit ◽  
Koji Sasaki ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Deborah A Thomas ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The mini-hyper-CVD regimen is being developed as a frontline treatment for older (≥60 years) patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This regimen utilizes reduced doses of conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy in comparison to the traditional hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone 50%, methotrexate 75%, cytarabine 83% dose reductions, and anthracycline omitted) and adds a novel antibody drug conjugate, inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO). Given that this regimen utilizes 75% less methotrexate than the traditional hyper-CVAD and that therapeutic drug monitoring is a standard of care for patients receiving high-dose methotrexate, here we aim to compare the clearance of methotrexate in patients receiving the mini-hyper-CVD regimen to those receiving traditional hyper-CVAD. Methods: Patients treated with frontline mini-hyper-CVD or hyper-CVAD at our institution from August 2011 to February 2016 were included in this single-center retrospective cohort analysis. Methotrexate levels from the first of four methotrexate cycles were obtained at the end of the continuous infusion (0-hour), at 24 and 48 hours post-infusion completion, or as clinically indicated. In some patients, methotrexate levels were not obtained at 48 hours if the 24-hour level demonstrated sufficient clearance. Delayed clearance was defined as methotrexate levels >20 µmol/L at 0 hour, >1 µmol/L at 24 hours, or >0.1 µmol/L at 48 hours. Identical supportive care interventions to facilitate methotrexate elimination (e.g., urinary alkalization) and leucovorin rescue dose and schedules were used for both mini-hyper-CVD and traditional hyper-CVAD regimens. Results: A total of 87 patients treated with mini-hyper-CVD (n=44) and traditional hyper-CVAD (n=43) were included in this analysis. The patient population was predominately male (n=26) in both groups. The hyper-CVAD methotrexate levels at the 0-hour were 9.75 ± 6.63 µmol/L, and the mini-hyper-CVD methotrexate levels were 4.71 ± 2.46 µmol/L. There was a significant mean difference of 5.04 µmol/L between the two regimens at the 0-hour measurement (p <0.001; 95% CI [2.92 - 7.16]). Measurements at 24 hours and 48 hours were similar between the 2 regimens: the hyper-CVAD methotrexate levels were 0.183 ± 0.183 µmol/L at 24 hours and 0.062 ± 0.055 µmol/L at 48 hours, and the mini-Hyper-CVD methotrexate levels were 0.206 ± 0.287 µmol/L at 24 hours and 0.077 ± 0.100 µmol/L at 48 hours. Delayed clearance at 0-hour was observed in 9% (n=4) of patients treated with the hyper-CVAD regimen versus none of the patients treated with the mini-hyper-CVD regimen (p=0.0554). At 48 hours, 11% (n=5) of the mini-hyper-CVD patients and 7% (n=3) of the hyper-CVAD patients had delayed clearance. All patients with delayed 48-hour clearance had repeat measurements indicating clearance at 72 hours. Methotrexate-related adverse effects were uncommon and did not differ between the two regimens. Conclusions: Significant differences in 0-hour methotrexate levels were observed between the two regimens with the mini-hyper-CVD being 48% lower than those with the hyper-CVAD. There was no difference in 24- or 48-hour clearance between the regimens. This suggests that further studies evaluating simplified methotrexate clearance supportive-care strategies with mini-hyper-CVD regimen are warranted. Disclosures O'Brien: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Cortes:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding. Konopleva:Reata Pharmaceuticals: Equity Ownership; Abbvie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Stemline: Consultancy, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Calithera: Research Funding. Jain:Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novimmune: Consultancy, Honoraria; Infinity: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. Jabbour:ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Brown ◽  
Hiroto Inaba ◽  
Colleen Annesley ◽  
Jill Beck ◽  
Susan Colace ◽  
...  

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric malignancy. Advancements in technology that enhance our understanding of the biology of the disease, risk-adapted therapy, and enhanced supportive care have contributed to improved survival rates. However, additional clinical management is needed to improve outcomes for patients classified as high risk at presentation (eg, T-ALL, infant ALL) and who experience relapse. The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for pediatric ALL provide recommendations on the workup, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment of the disease, including guidance on supportive care, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and pharmacogenomics. This portion of the NCCN Guidelines focuses on the frontline and relapsed/refractory management of pediatric ALL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document