scholarly journals Psychosis in Alzheimer’s Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Clive Ballard ◽  
Helen C. Kales ◽  
Constantine Lyketsos ◽  
Dag Aarsland ◽  
Byron Creese ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose of Review To review the incidence, treatment and genetics of psychosis in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Recent Findings Psychosis in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) has an incidence of ~ 10% per year. There is limited evidence regarding psychological interventions. Pharmacological management has focused on atypical antipsychotics, balancing modest benefits with evidence of long-term harms. The 5HT2A inverse agonist pimavanserin appears to confer benefit in PD psychosis with initial evidence of benefit in AD. Cholinesterase inhibitors give modest benefits in DLB psychosis. The utility of muscarinic agonists, lithium, glutamatergic and noradrenergic modulators needs further study. Summary Recent work has confirmed the importance of psychosis in MCI as well as AD. The lack of evidence regarding psychological therapies is an urgent knowledge gap, but there is encouraging evidence for emerging pharmacological treatments. Genetics will provide an opportunity for precision medicine and new treatment targets.

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 228
Author(s):  
José L Molinuevo ◽  

Two effective symptomatic therapies are available for Alzheimer’s disease: the cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and memantine, an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist. Current data demonstrate that combination therapy with memantine and a ChEI produces symptomatic benefits in all domains of AD. The benefits of combination therapy are greater than those of ChEI monotherapy, are sustained long term and appear to increase with time.


2013 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 733-740 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn W. Zhu ◽  
Elayne E. Livote ◽  
Nikolaos Scarmeas ◽  
Marilyn Albert ◽  
Jason Brandt ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 170 (9) ◽  
pp. 1051-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oscar L. Lopez ◽  
James T. Becker ◽  
Yue-Fang Chang ◽  
Robert A. Sweet ◽  
Howard Aizenstein ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Constantine G. Lyketsos

Several lines of evidence suggest that acetylcholine (ACh) neurotransmission is important to the normal functioning of memory, and loss of ACh-producing cells in the basal forebrain (nucleus basalis) is a consistent finding in patients with Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. The most successful approach to increasing ACh in vivo has been to develop drugs that reduce its degradation by the synaptic enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE). Four cholinesterase inhibitors are available to treat memory and other cognitive symptoms in dementia patients. They may also stabilize or prevent the onset of milder non-cognitive neuropsychiatric or behavioral symptoms, although their use as exclusive agents for the more severe forms of the latter is not recommended. A recent Consensus Panel has articulated sound clinical principles regarding the use of these drugs in the context of the broader treatment of Alzheimer’s dementia (Lyketsos et al., 2006). Tacrine, donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Tacrine should not ordinarily be used in light of the associated high risk of hepatotoxicity, its complex titration, and the availability of bettertolerated alternatives. The other three cholinesterase inhibitors seem similar in efficacy. All appear to modestly improve cognitive symptoms in 15% to 20% of patients, sometimes quite notably. In addition, they may either improve patient function and delay the emergence of behavioral symptoms or reduce the severity of the latter. The evidence does not support their use as single agents to treat more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms such as depression or delusions, although patients with apathy and visual hallucinations may respond. Any benefit of cholinesterase inhibitors to the long-term progression of dementia has not been shown conclusively. Some studies suggest that they may attenuate the long-term slope of cognitive or functional decline, but those studies have been flawed due to high levels of dropout and the use of historical untreated comparison groups. One brain imaging study, part of a clinical trial, has suggested that they may affect the size of the hippocampus or the integrity of hippocampal neurons. In the absence of replication or a better understanding of the imaging measures involved, these data are not conclusive.


Healthcare ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Abate ◽  
Maurizio Memo ◽  
Daniela Uberti

In the middle of the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) outbreak, the main efforts of the scientific community are rightly all focused on identifying efficient pharmacological treatments to cure the acute severe symptoms and developing a reliable vaccine. On the other hand, we cannot exclude that, in Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive subjects, the virus infection could have long-term consequences, leading to chronic medical conditions such as dementia and neurodegenerative disease. Considering the age of SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects, the neuroinvasive potential might lead/contribute to the development of neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we analyzed a possible link between SARS-CoV-2 infection and Alzheimer’s disease risk, hypothesizing possible mechanisms at the base of disease development. This reflection raises the need to start to experimentally investigating today the mechanistic link between Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and COVID-19 to be ready tomorrow.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document