Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL), CD4+/CD8weak T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGL leukemia) and monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS): molecular and flow cytometry characterization of three concomitant hematological disorders

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 3557-3560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Mazza Matos ◽  
Ana Cesarina Vitoriano de Oliveira ◽  
Maria de Nazaré Amaral Tomé ◽  
Carlos Alberto Scrideli
Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3750-3750
Author(s):  
Hassan Awada ◽  
Jibran Durrani ◽  
Ashwin Kishtagari ◽  
Valeria Visconte ◽  
Reda Z. Mahfouz

Large granular lymphocytic leukemia (LGLL) is an indolent disease and often associated with autoimmune disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis. The association of humoral immune disorders resulting from abnormal B cell activity, may affect original LGLL pathogenesis, clinical presentation and management through modifying disease presentation, progression and/ or resistance to standard care. Coexistence of T cell LGL leukemia with B cell abnormalities has previously been identified in the literature although described in sporadic case reports. However, no large case series or cohorts have been collected so far to study the frequency of the B-cell dyscrasia (BCD) associated with LGLL and describe clinical/ hematological findings in patients with this co-association. Here, we conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with LGL leukemia at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation to search for any associated BCDs. We then classified our population into 2 groups: LGLL with BCD vs. LGLL without BCD, and comprehensively compared them for baseline, clinical and molecular characteristics. A total of 244 T-LGL patients were collected and studied. All cases were uniformly diagnosed with LGLL if 3 out of 4 following criteria were fulfilled, including: 1) LGL count >500/µL in blood for more than 6 months; 2) presence of abnormal CTLs expressing CD3, CD8 and CD57 by flow cytometry; 3) preferential usage of a TCR Vβ family by flow cytometry; 4) TCR gene rearrangement by PCR. Molecular studies including targeted deep sequencing for STAT3mutations were performed. Bone marrow biopsy results were reviewed to exclude other conditions. Endpoints of the study were death or lost to follow up. In our cohort, we found a frequent manifestation of humoral immune system abnormalities. We identified coexisting BCD in 45% (109/ 244) of LGLL patients, of whom 28 (11.2%) had monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS), and 13 (5.2%) had chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL/SLL). Six LGLL patients had multiple myeloma (2.4%). Moreover, polyclonal hypergammaglobulinemia (n=28, 11.2%) or hypogammaglobulinemia (n=14, 5.6%) was reported in 42 LGLL-patients (16.8%). The frequency of other disorders of B-cell origin was also examined. The total incidence of B-cell abnormalities in our LGLL cohort was 45%. Indeed an heterogeneous appearance of other B-cell disorders was observed including mantle cell lymphoma (n=2), DLBCL (n=6), marginal zone lymphoma (n=3), Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (n=1), Burkitt's lymphoma (n=1), indolent lymphoma (n=1), Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=1), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=3), neck lymphoma (n=1), and smoldering myeloma (n=2). Patient with LGLL-BCD were older as compared to the ones without (median age: 62 vs. 63 years; ≥60 years: 57% vs. 69%, respectively), although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.07). Gender was equally distributed (male: 54%, n=132; female: 46%, n=112) in patients who developed BCD. Conventional cytogenetics showed that patients without BCD were more often associated with abnormal cytogenetics (24%, n=9) as compared to LGLL-BCD (9%, n=5). Interestingly, BCD was found in 55 men and 54 women in whom only 6 patients had NK-LGLL while the remaining (n=103 patients) had T-LGLL suggesting a higher association with LGLL of T- rather than of NK-cell origin. Leukopenia was observed in 25/109 patients, with average absolute lymphocytes of 4.18 k/µL and LGL count of 2333 k/µL. Blood count showed: neutropenia in 44, anemia in 65, and thrombocytopenia in 29 out of 109 LGLL patients with BCD. TCR rearrangements were seen in 74 while somatic STAT3 mutations were observed in 37 LGLL patients while more enriched (44%, n=52) in LGLL without BCD. The association of other autoimmune conditions e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, was not different between the two groups (15% vs. 16% in LGLL with BCD vs. without; P=0.8). In sum, our investigation shows that BCD were frequent in LGLL and coexisted in 45% of the patients, commonly in the form of MGUS, and/ or hypergamaglobulinemia. Perhaps, the co-association of B-cell pathology with LGLL suggests that the two diseases either share pathogenetic driving mechanisms to enhance both B cells and T cells clones or that immunological dysfunction in setting of B cell dyscrasia could trigger/potentiate LGL expansion and/or transformation in this context. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e2018036
Author(s):  
Ashley M Rose ◽  
Leidy Isenalumhe ◽  
Magali VanDenBergh ◽  
Lubomir Sokol

We report five patients with human immunodeficiency virus-1/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV-1/AIDS) who developed T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL). None of the patients fulfilled criteria for diagnosis of diffuse infiltrative lymphocyte syndrome (DILS) or HIV-associated CD8+ lymphocytosis syndrome at the time of diagnosis of LGLL. The immunophenotype of malignant T-cells was identical in three patients with co-expression of CD3, CD8, CD57, and T-cell receptor (TCR) alpha/beta. Three out of five patients were also diagnosed with clonal disorders of B-cell origin including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, Burkitt’s lymphoma, and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS).  Two patients developed cytopenias due to T-LGLL prompting initiation of therapy. Our study suggests that chronic viral infection with HIV can contribute to evolution of T-LGLL. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of T-LGLL associated with HIV-1/AIDS resemble those of immunocompetent  patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 149 (2) ◽  
pp. 164-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanu Goyal ◽  
Beenu Thakral ◽  
Sa A Wang ◽  
Carlos E Bueso-Ramos ◽  
Min Shi ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (5S) ◽  
pp. 797-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. Zelenetz

During his presentation at the NCCN 19th Annual Conference, Dr. Andrew D. Zelenetz reviewed the updates to the 2014 NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas. Dr. Zelenetz first discussed the updates for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), focusing primarily on the emergence of MYC-positive DLBCL; the limited role of imaging in early-stage disease; new treatment options; the challenge of tumor heterogeneity; and the impact of cell of origin in the selection of future therapies. Then, on behalf of Dr. Steven Horwitz, Dr. Zelenetz presented the new guidelines for primary cutaneous CD30+ T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders and T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2471-2471
Author(s):  
Zachary Braunstein ◽  
Eric McLaughlin ◽  
Anjali Mishra ◽  
Jonathan E Brammer

Abstract T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL) is a clonal proliferation of cytotoxic T-lymphocytes that can result in severe cytopenias. The management of T-LGLL is immune-suppressive therapy, with methotrexate (MTX), cyclophosphamide (Cy), and cyclosporine (CsA) serving as primary frontline agents. While MTX has been the main front line agent to treat T-LGLL, overall response rates (ORR) are less than 40%, with complete response (CR) rates of only 5%. Data from the ECOG5998 (E5998) prospective trial and French cohort studies suggest an improved response with Cy in the 2 nd line setting. Anecdotal evidence suggests that Cy may eradicate the T-LGLL clone, producing complete molecular remission (CMR), which has not been observed with MTX or CsA. The degree to which a CMR can be attained and the lengths of such remissions with Cy remains unknown, particularly in the relapsed setting. We evaluated patients treated with Cy, to assess the duration of response and degree of CMR. We retrospectively evaluated patients treated for T-LGLL with oral Cy. Diagnosis of was based on 2016 World Health Organization Criteria. Patients needed a CD3+ CD8+ population on flow cytometry ≥500 cells/mm 3 and a positive monoclonal T-cell receptor (TCR) by PCR or restriction of TCR-Vbeta on flow cytometry. TCR-Vbeta rearrangement was deemed positive if one or more clone was detected in ≥10% of events. Disease response was defined by the E5998 study criteria. CMR was defined as CR by E5998 criteria and clearance of the TCR PCR gene rearrangement or TCR-VBeta flow cytometry. Time to response (TTR) was measured as time from start of Cy until partial response (PR) or CR, with patients who failed to respond being censored at the end of Cy treatment. Leukemia-free survival (LFS) in patients responding to Cy was measured as time from start of Cy until progression. Patients without progression were censored at last follow up. TTR and LFS were compared across variables using Kaplan-Meier curves with median survival and 95% confidence intervals. A total of 25 patients, with a mean duration of Cy treatment of 8 months, and median follow up time of 19 months, were included in this analysis. Patients were started on 50 mg daily for 2 weeks and then increased to 100 mg if tolerated. Three patients (12%) were treated with Cy as 1 st line, 14 (56%) as 2 nd line, 5 (20%) as 3 rd line, and 3 (12%) as 4 th line. Of the 3 patients that received Cy as 1 st line, none had a response. All refractory patients received MTX prior to Cy. Of the 22 refractory patients, 14 (64%) had a response (6 CR, 8 PR), 7 patients had no response, and 1 could not be determined due to development of multiple myeloma. Of the 6 patients that attained a CR, 50% had a CMR. The median TTR (CR or PR) was 6 months (95% CI: 4-7) while median time to PR was 9 months and median time to CR was 7 months. The median time to CMR was 11 months. In patients that achieved a response, median follow up time was 27 months, with a median LFS of 24 months. Median LFS for those who attained a PR was 20 months, while the median LFS for those who attained a CR was not reached as none progressed (Figure). The median follow-up for patients with a CMR was 17 months with LFS having not been reached due to no progression. There was no significant impact of age, gender, or presence of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on LFS. Males (48%) had a shorter TTR compared to females (52%) (5 vs 7 months; p=0.05). Patients with RA (28%) also trended towards a shorter TTR (p=0.07). Herein, we demonstrate that patients treated for relapsed T-LGLL with Cy can attain durable remissions, with a prolonged response. Of particular interest is that no patients who attained a CR have relapsed, showing that durable remission is achievable, while no patients that received Cy as 1 st line had a response. Further, in patients that achieved a CR, 50% achieved a CMR which has not been previously demonstrated in the relapsed setting. While limited in cohort size, and additional follow up needed, these data suggest that Cy can produce long term remissions in patients with relapsed T-LGLL and induce CMR. While we demonstrate that CMR is attainable in the relapsed setting, the impact of this on long term disease control compared to clinical CR is unclear. Therefore, we recommend that CMR be used as an endpoint in future studies, particularly prospective trials, to evaluate response to treatment. These data clearly demonstrate that Cy is effective in the setting of relapsed T-LGLL and can induce long term disease control. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Brammer: Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau; Kymera Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document