scholarly journals Gravitational attraction of a vertical pyramid model of flat top-and-bottom with depth-wise parabolic density variation

2015 ◽  
Vol 124 (8) ◽  
pp. 1735-1744 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANAND P GOKULA ◽  
RAMBHATLA G SASTRY
Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (6) ◽  
pp. G93-G112
Author(s):  
Anand Prakash Gokula ◽  
Rambhatla G. Sastry

As an alternative to the popular rectangular parallelepiped model, we have developed a novel 3D analytical forward-problem solution for the gravity gradient tensor of a vertical pyramid model with parabolic density contrast variation. Its flexibility and effectiveness are demonstrated with the help of synthetic simulations and a case study involving Chintalapudi subbasin, India. We have addressed the singularities and numerical stability in numerical implementation of our algorithm for modeling and practical implementation.


1940 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 235-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. E. Bullen

Summary The present paper examines the problem of the earth's density variation and includes a quantitative discussion of the errors likely to be involved. Figures are given for the density distribution of the earth's outer mantle, and it is shown that all these are probably accurate within about 0.05 gm/cm.3 On the figures presented, the density in the earth's mantle ranges from 3.32 gm/cm.3 at the base of the crustal layers to 5.68 gm/cm.3 at the base of the mantle. The mean density of the central core is shown to be 10.7 gm/cm.3 within an error of order 0.1 gm/cm.3 Application of equations derived by Birch from Murnaghan's theory of finite strain indicates agreement with the density figures found, but it is to be noted that the rigidity of the lower portion of the earth's mantle appears to increase more slowly with increase of depth than would be consistent with the equations of Birch. Values which are expected to need very little future amendment are also given for the pressure and gravitational attraction within the earth's mantle.


Author(s):  
Philip D. Lunger ◽  
H. Fred Clark

In the course of fine structure studies of spontaneous “C-type” particle production in a viper (Vipera russelli) spleen cell line, designated VSW, virus particles were frequently observed within mitochondria. The latter were usually enlarged or swollen, compared to virus-free mitochondria, and displayed a considerable degree of cristae disorganization.Intramitochondrial viruses measure 90 to 100 mμ in diameter, and consist of a nucleoid or core region of varying density and measuring approximately 45 mμ in diameter. Nucleoid density variation is presumed to reflect varying degrees of condensation, and hence maturation stages. The core region is surrounded by a less-dense outer zone presumably representing viral capsid.Particles are usually situated in peripheral regions of the mitochondrion. In most instances they appear to be lodged between loosely apposed inner and outer mitochondrial membranes.


2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 125-135
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Connolly

In a recent article Fred Ablondi compares the different approaches to occasionalism put forward by two eighteenth-century Newtonians, Colin Maclaurin and Andrew Baxter. The goal of this short essay is to respond to Ablondi by clarifying some key features of Maclaurin's views on occasionalism and the cause of gravitational attraction. In particular, I explore Maclaurin's matter theory, his views on the explanatory limits of mechanism, and his appeals to the authority of Newton. This leads to a clearer picture of the way in which Maclaurin understood gravitational attraction and the workings of nature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document