Mosaic Down syndrome-associated acute myeloid leukemia does not require high-dose cytarabine treatment for induction and consolidation therapy

2010 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 630-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kazuko Kudo ◽  
Asahito Hama ◽  
Seiji Kojima ◽  
Ruriko Ishii ◽  
Akira Morimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Mosaic Down Syndrome ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Varying intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 79 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
PA Cassileth ◽  
E Lynch ◽  
JD Hines ◽  
MM Oken ◽  
JJ Mazza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Postremission Therapy ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) conducted a randomized trial in patients less than or equal to 65 years old (median, 44 years) to determine whether increasing the intensity of postremission therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) would improve the outcome. After uniform induction therapy, patients in complete remission (CR) who were less than 41 years old and who had a histocompatible sibling underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (alloBMT) (54 patients). The remainder of patients in CR were randomized to receive either 2 years of continuous outpatient maintenance therapy with cytarabine and 6- thioguanine (83 patients) or a single course of inpatient consolidation therapy consisting of 6 days of high-dose cytarabine plus 3 days of amsacrine (87 patients). The median duration of follow-up is now 4 years, and patients are included in the analyses of outcome regardless of whether they relapsed before starting the intended treatment. Four- year event-free survival (EFS) was 27% +/- 10% for consolidation therapy versus 16% +/- 8% for maintenance therapy (P = .068) and 28% +/- 11% versus 15% +/- 9% (P = .047) in patients less than 60 years old. The outcome for patients receiving alloBMT was compared with the subset of patients less than 41 years old who received consolidation therapy (N = 29) or maintenance therapy (N = 21). Four-year EFS was 42% +/- 13% for alloBMT, 30% +/- 17% for consolidation therapy, and 14% +/- 15% for maintenance therapy. AlloBMT had a significantly better EFS (P = .013) than maintenance therapy, but was not different from consolidation therapy. In patients less than 41 years old, 4-year survival after alloBMT (42% +/- 14%) did not differ from consolidation therapy (43% +/- 18%), but both were significantly better than maintenance therapy (19% +/- 17%), P = .047 and .043, respectively. The mortality rate for maintenance therapy was 0%, consolidation therapy, 21%; and alloBMT, 36%. Consolidation therapy caused an especially high mortality rate in the patients greater than or equal to 60 years old (8 of 14 or 57%). The toxicity of combined high-dose cytarabine and amsacrine is unacceptable, especially in older patients, and alternative approaches to consolidation therapy such as high-dose cytarabine alone need to be tested. In AML, a single course of consolidation therapy or alloBMT after initial CR produces better results than lengthy maintenance therapy. Although EFS and survival of alloBMT and consolidation therapy do not differ significantly, a larger number of patients need to be studied before concluding that they are equivalent.

Safety and feasibility of outpatient high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine for consolidation therapy in acute myeloid leukemia

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110465
Author(s):  
Wenhui Li ◽  
Katherine Richter ◽  
Jamie Lee ◽  
Kevin McCarthy ◽  
Timothy Kubal
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Incidence Of Hospitalization ◽  
Acute Myeloid ◽  
Intermediate Dose

Introduction The standard of care consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia is high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine, which are traditionally given inpatient. At Moffitt Cancer Center, we have moved the administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine to the outpatient setting through the inpatient/outpatient program. To facilitate outpatient administration, high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine are given in a shorter interval of every 10 h instead of 12 h. The safety of a shorter duration interval of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is unknown. This study aims to assess the safety and feasibility of administering high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy in the inpatient/outpatient setting. Methods This is a retrospective chart review to analyze acute myeloid leukemia patients treated with inpatient/outpatient high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy at Moffitt Cancer Center from January 1, 2015, through November 1, 2018. The primary objective was to determine the incidence of hospitalization during the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine or intermediate-dose cytarabine. Results Two hundred fifty-three of 255 cycles of high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine were delivered outpatient over the reviewed time period to 118 patients. No patients receiving outpatient high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine consolidation required hospitalization during chemotherapy. Our incidence of hospitalization (24%) after chemotherapy is consistent with the reported literature. Through the inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine, 1265 inpatient days were saved with an approximate revenue of $3,135,176 generated in our study period. Conclusion Inpatient/outpatient administration of high-dose cytarabine and intermediate-dose cytarabine is both safe and feasible. Moving high-dose cytarabine/intermediate-dose cytarabine administration to the outpatient setting resulted in significant additional revenue vs. inpatient administration.

Repetitive Cycles of High-Dose Cytarabine Benefit Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22): Results from CALGB 8461

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
pp. 1087-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
John C. Byrd ◽  
Amy S. Ruppert ◽  
Krzysztof Mrózek ◽  
Andrew J. Carroll ◽  
Colin G. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
The Impact ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Purpose To study the impact of repetitive (three to four courses) versus a single course of high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) consolidation therapy on outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and inv(16)(p13q22) or t(16;16)(p13;q22). Patients and Methods We examined the cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) for 48 adults younger than 60 years with inv(16)/t(16;16) who had attained a complete remission on one of four consecutive clinical trials and were assigned to receive HDAC consolidation therapy. Twenty-eight patients were assigned to either three or four courses of HDAC, and 20 patients were assigned to one course of HDAC followed by alternative intensive consolidation therapy. Results Pretreatment features were similar for the two groups. The CIR was significantly decreased in patients assigned to receive three to four cycles of HDAC compared with patients assigned to one course (P = .03; 5-year CIR, 43% v 70%, respectively). The difference in RFS also approached statistical significance (P = .06). In a multivariable analysis that adjusted for potential confounding covariates, only treatment assignment (three to four cycles of HDAC) predicted for superior RFS (P = .02). The OS of both groups was similar (P = .93; 5-year OS, 75% for the three to four cycles of HDAC group v 70% for the one cycle of HDAC group), reflecting a high success rate with stem-cell transplantation salvage treatment administered among patients in both treatment groups. Conclusion We conclude that, in AML patients with inv(16)/t(16;16), repetitive HDAC therapy decreases the likelihood of relapse compared with consolidation regimens including less HDAC.

scholarly journals Does high-dose cytarabine cause cumulative toxicity in patients undergoing consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia?

2013 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 533-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andres Wiernik ◽  
Wolfgang R. Sperr ◽  
Daniel Weisdorf ◽  
Peter Valent ◽  
Celalettin Ustun
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
Cumulative Toxicity ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

High-dose cytarabine and daunorubicin as consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: long-term follow-up and results.

1989 ◽  
Vol 7 (9) ◽  
pp. 1260-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
S N Wolff ◽  
R H Herzig ◽  
J W Fay ◽  
G L Phillips ◽  
H M Lazarus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Allogeneic Bone ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

In an effort to increase the proportion of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remaining in continued complete remission (CCR), we administered intensive postremission consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) and daunorubicin. Eighty-seven patients, with a median age of 38 years (range, 7 to 71), received consolidation therapy after first complete remission was obtained with standard induction chemotherapy that included conventional doses of Ara-C. Consolidation therapy consisted of from one to three cycles of high-dose Ara-C (3 g/m2 intravenously [IV] over 1 hour every 12 hours for 12 doses) followed by daunorubicin (30 mg/m2/d IV bolus for 3 days). After completion of the high-dose Ara-C and daunorubicin, no further therapy was administered. Myelosuppression encountered with consolidation resulted in a median duration of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia of 3 weeks. Four patients (5%) died during consolidation due to infection and/or hemorrhage; 59% of patients experienced severe but nonfatal infectious or extramedullary organ toxicity. With a median follow-up of more than 3.5 years from diagnosis, the proportion of patients, by Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimate, remaining in CCR is 49% (95% confidence limits, 37% to 61%). In a Cox multivariate analysis, only age significantly (P less than .001) influenced the probability of remaining in CCR. The probability of remaining in CCR was 83%, 50%, and 23% for age groups of 25 or less, 26 to 45, and more than 45 years, respectively. These survival curves all have stable long-term plateaus, suggesting cure. In this study, the administration of brief, intensive nonmarrow ablative chemotherapy resulted in a large proportion of patients with AML remaining in CCR, results similar to those reported with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Relapse of acute leukemia was still the major reason for therapy failure, suggesting that more effective or additional postremission therapy will be required to further improve the likelihood of cure especially for older patients.

scholarly journals Condensed Versus Standard Schedule of High-Dose Cytarabine Consolidation Therapy with Pegfilgrastim Growth Factor Support in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 337-337
Author(s):  
Sonia Jaramillo ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Jurgen Krauter ◽  
Hans Martin ◽  
Thomas Kindler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Valproic Acid ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract Background: The concept of intensive post-remission chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is based on the observation that despite achievement of a first complete remission (CR) after intensive induction therapy virtually all patients relapse in the absence of further treatment. Moreover, randomized studies showed that intensive post-remission consolidation chemotherapy was superior to prolonged low-dose maintenance therapy in younger patients. With regard to consolidation therapy, the landmark study conducted by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B established the current standard for patients aged 60 years and younger with high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) 3g/m² bidaily on days days 1, 3, and 5. Aims: to compare a compressed schedule of high-dose cytarabine (HDAC) on days 1, 2, and 3 with the standard HDAC given on days 1, 3, and 5 as well as to evaluate the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy in patients in first CR receiving repetitive consolidation cycles for acute myeloid leukemia. Methods: Patients (18 to 60 years) were accrued between 2004 and 2009. They were randomized up-front 1:10 between the standard German intergroup-arm (Büchner et al. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:3604-10) and the AMLSG 07-04 study (NCT00151242). Induction therapy in the AMLSG 07-04 study consisted of two cycles of idarubicin, cytarabine and etoposide +/- all-trans retionoic acid (ATRA) and +/- valproic acid (VPA) in a 2 by 2 factorial design. After recruitment of 392 patients the randomization for VPA was stopped due to toxicity. For consolidation therapy, patients with high-risk AML, defined either by high-risk cytogenetics or induction failure, were assigned to receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation from a matched related or unrelated donor. All other patients were assigned to 3 cycles of HDAC from 2004 to November 2006 with cytarabine 3g/m² bidaily, on days 1, 3, 5 and pegfilgrastim on day 10 (HDAC-135) and from December 2006 to 2009 patients were treated with a condensed schedule with cytarabine 3g/m², bidaily, on days 1,2,3 and pegfilgrastim on day 8 (HDAC-123). Patients randomized into the German AML intergroup arm were treated for consolidation therapy with cytarabine 3g/m² bid on days 1, 3, 5 (HDAC-135) without prophylactic growth-factor support. Results:Overall 568 patients receiving 1376 consolidation cycles were included into the study. According to up-front randomization 41 were treated with HDAC-135 without prophylactic growth factor support in the German AML Intergroup protocol, 135 with HDAC-135 and 392 with HDAC-123 with intended prophylactic pegfilgrastim at day 10 and 8, respectively, in the AMLSG 07-04 protocol. Time from start to chemotherapy until hematological recovery with leukocytes >1.0G/l and neutrophils >0.5G/l was significantly (p<0.0001, each) and in median 4 days shorter in patients receiving HDAC-123 compared to HDAC-135, and further reduced by 2 days (p<0.0001) by the addition of pegfilgrastim. Treatment with ATRA and VPA according to initial randomization had no impac on hematological recovery times. Rates of infections were significantly reduced by HDAC-123 compared to HDAC-135 (p<0.0001) and pegfilgrastim yes versus no (p=0.002). Days in hospital and platelet transfusions were also significantly reduced in patients receiving HDAC-123 compared to HDAC-135. Relapse-free and overall survival were similar with HDAC-123 and HDAC-135 (p=0.48, p=0.90, respectively). Conclusion: Data from our study suggest that consolidation therapy with a condensed schedule of HDAC-123 is superior to that of standard HDAC-135 in terms of faster hematological recovery, lower infection rate and fever days in hospital. In addition, the administration of one dose of pegfilgrastim after chemotherapy further shortened hematological recovery and reduced infection rate. Importantly, similar efficacy in terms of relapse-free and overall survival rates after HDAC-123 and HDAC-135 were observed. Disclosures Lübbert: Ratiopharm: Other: Study drug valproic acid; Janssen-Cilag: Other: Travel Funding, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Travel Funding. Fiedler:GSO: Other: Travel; Pfizer: Research Funding; Teva: Other: Travel; Gilead: Other: Travel; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad/Incyte: Consultancy; Kolltan: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Other: Travel, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Schlenk:Amgen: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals Does High-Dose Cytarabine Cause More Fungal Infection in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Undergoing Consolidation Therapy

Medicine ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. e2560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ling Wang ◽  
Jiong Hu ◽  
Yuqian Sun ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Fungal Infection ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Consolidation Therapy ◽  
High Dose Cytarabine ◽  
Acute Myeloid
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document