scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Meropenem–Vaborbactam Versus Best Available Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections in Patients Without Prior Antimicrobial Failure: A Post Hoc Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1771-1777 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Bassetti ◽  
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe ◽  
Niki Patel ◽  
Glenn Tillotson ◽  
Jill Massey
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S303-S303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee Ackley ◽  
Danya Roshdy ◽  
Jacqueline Isip ◽  
Sarah B, Minor ◽  
Amanda L Elchynski ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Options for treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections were historically limited to antibiotics with limited efficacy and significant toxicities. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CA) and meropenem/vaborbactam (MV) are superior to older regimens; however, a direct comparison of the agents is lacking. This study compared clinical outcomes including recurrence of infection and emergence of drug resistance in patients who received CA vs. MV for CRE infections. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of adults with CRE infections who received CA or MV for ≥72 hours from February 2015 to October 2018. Patients with localized urinary tract infection were excluded. The primary endpoint was clinical success (30-day survival, resolution of signs and symptoms of infection, sterilization of blood cultures within 7 days in patients with bacteremia, absence of recurrent infection). Secondary endpoints included 30- and 90-day mortality, adverse events (AE), recurrent CRE infection within 90 days, and development of resistance in patients with recurrent infection. We conducted a post hoc subgroup analysis in patients with recurrence to compare development of resistance in those who received CA monotherapy, CA combination therapy, and MV monotherapy. Results 131 patients were included (CA: 105 patients, MV: 26 patients), 40% had bacteremia. No statistical difference in clinical success was observed between groups (62% vs. 69%, respectively, P = 0.49). Patients in the CA arm received combination therapy more often than patients in the MV arm (61% vs. 15%, P < 0.01). No difference in 30- and 90-day mortality resulted among groups, but numerically higher rates of AE were observed in the CA group (38% vs. 23%, P = 0.17). In patients with recurrent infection, development of resistance occurred more often with CA monotherapy, though not statistically significant (Table 1). One case of MV resistance was observed in a patient who had received 4 prior courses of MV, but this episode was outside of the study period. Conclusion Clinical success was similar between the groups despite MV being used more often as monotherapy. Development of resistance and rates of AE were higher in the CA group compared with MV therapy. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 24 ◽  
pp. 51-52
Author(s):  
Vanita Aroda ◽  
Danny Sugimoto ◽  
David Trachtenbarg ◽  
Mark Warren ◽  
Gurudutt Nayak ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Andrea Giaccari ◽  
R. C. Bonadonna ◽  
R. Buzzetti ◽  
G. Perseghin ◽  
D. Cucinotta ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims The Italian Titration Approach Study (ITAS) demonstrated comparable HbA1c reductions and similarly low hypoglycaemia risk at 6 months in poorly controlled, insulin-naïve adults with T2DM who initiated self- or physician-titrated insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in the absence of sulphonylurea/glinide. The association of patient characteristics with glycaemic and hypoglycaemic outcomes was assessed. Methods This post hoc analysis investigated whether baseline patient characteristics and previous antihyperglycaemic drugs were associated with HbA1c change and hypoglycaemia risk in patient- versus physician-managed Gla-300 titration. Results HbA1c change, incidence of hypoglycaemia (any type) and nocturnal rates were comparable between patient- and physician-managed arms in all subgroups. Hypoglycaemia rates across subgroups (0.03 to 3.52 events per patient-year) were generally as low as observed in the full ITAS population. Small increases in rates of 00:00–pre-breakfast and anytime hypoglycaemia were observed in the ≤ 10-year diabetes duration subgroup in the patient- versus physician-managed arm (heterogeneity of effect; p < 0.05). Conclusions Comparably fair glycaemic control and similarly low hypoglycaemia risk were achieved in almost all patient subgroups with patient- versus physician-led Gla-300 titration. These results reinforce efficacy and safety of Gla-300 self-titration across a range of phenotypes of insulin-naïve people with T2DM. Clinical trial registration EudraCT 2015-001167-39


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiu-Qin Jia ◽  
Feng Pang ◽  
Xin Luo ◽  
Jian Zhang

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to performe a retrospective analysis of prevalence and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections in children in a tertiary hospital. Methods The non-repeat clinical isolates of CRE in children were collected in Liaocheng People's Hospital from January, 2013 to December, 2018. The bacterial identification and antibiotic susceptibility was performed according to the standard methods. The isolated strains will be detected carbapenemases genotypes and homology analysis. All data on the culture-positive strains and associated clinical infection from different pediatric wards were reviewed. Results A total of 20 CRE strains isolated from pediatric patients, which derived from different infection sites and present a classification of multiple species of Enterobacteriaceae. And the production of IMP-type carbapenemase in these strains is the main reason of antimicrobial resistance. Most of the infected patients have severe comorbidities and invasive procedures, and use insensitive drugs due to the high resistance rates and medication restrictions. Nevertheless, most infected children have been treated despite the resistance of pathogens to multiple antimicrobial agents. In our follow-up survey, most children received adjuvant therapy such as human intravenous immunoglobulin, which may be an important factor in helping patients defeat pathogenic bacteria. Conclusions This study demonstrates a high prevalence of IMP-mediated CRE infection in pediatric patients with severe comorbidities and invasive procedures. Most children have been cured, which may be related to application of adjuvant therapy and weaker pathogenicity of the IMP-type Enterobacteriaceae.


Author(s):  
Eric P. Skaar ◽  
Roger Echols ◽  
Yuko Matsunaga ◽  
Anju Menon ◽  
Simon Portsmouth

AbstractCritically ill patients often present with low serum iron levels or anemia. We evaluated the impact of iron levels and iron homeostasis on the efficacy and safety of cefiderocol, an iron-chelator siderophore cephalosporin, in patients with nosocomial pneumonia in a post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 APEKS-NP study (NCT03032380). Patients with Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia received cefiderocol 2 g, 3-h infusion, q8h, or high-dose, extended-infusion meropenem 2 g, 3-h infusion, q8h, for 7–14 days. Efficacy and safety parameters, including specific iron homeostasis parameters (i.e., hepcidin, iron, total iron binding capacity, transferrin saturation), were analyzed according to baseline iron levels. In the cefiderocol and meropenem arms, 79.1% (117/148) and 83.3% (125/150) randomized patients, respectively, had low baseline serum iron levels. Rates of 14-day (12.3% [14/114] vs 11.6% [14/121]) and 28-day all-cause mortality (20.5% [23/112] vs 19.0% [23/121]), clinical cure (63.2% [72/114] vs 67.2% [82/122]), and microbiological eradication (43.6% [41/94] vs 48.1% [51/106]) at test of cure were similar in cefiderocol vs meropenem arms, respectively. In the overall safety population, rates of anemia-related adverse events were similar (cefiderocol arm 18.2% [27/148], meropenem arm 18.7% [28/150]). Changes from baseline to test of cure in hepcidin, iron, total iron binding capacity, and transferrin saturation were similar between treatment arms. Cefiderocol treatment did not affect iron homeostasis, and its efficacy and safety were not influenced by baseline serum iron levels. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT03032380. Date of registration: 26 January 2017.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S286-S286
Author(s):  
Elham Rahmati ◽  
Emily Blodget ◽  
Rosemary C She ◽  
Jennifer Cupo Abbott ◽  
Robert A Bonomo ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document