Site response assessment of an urban extension site using microtremor measurements, Ahud Rufeidah, Abha District, Southwest Saudi Arabia

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 2347-2357
Author(s):  
Sattam Almadani ◽  
Kamal Abdelrahman ◽  
Elkhedr Ibrahim ◽  
Abdulaziz Al-Bassam ◽  
Awad Al-Shmrani
2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 10015-10030
Author(s):  
M. Alharbi ◽  
M. Fnais ◽  
A. Al-Amri ◽  
Kamal Abdelrahman ◽  
Meinrat O. Andreae ◽  
...  

1993 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 221-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Morales ◽  
Kazuoh Seo ◽  
Takanori Samano ◽  
Jose A. Peña ◽  
Jesus M. Ibáñez ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Sgattoni ◽  
Silvia Castellaro

<p>Measuring ground resonances is of great importance for seismic site amplification studies. The task is usually addressed with the common H/V (horizontal to vertical spectral ratio) approach, which is widely used for both microzonation studies and stratigraphic imaging. Peaks on the H/V function are used to identify ground resonance frequencies, usually assuming 1D site conditions, i.e. with plane-parallel stratigraphy. In the simple case of a horizontal soft layer overlying a bedrock, 1D resonance is linked to the local bedrock depth (as a function of the shear wave velocity of the sediment layer). Therefore, when the 1D approximation holds, spatial variations of the resonance frequency reflect changes of bedrock depth (when lateral homogeneity of the sediment cover can be assumed). However, at sites with non-plane subsurface geometries, more complex resonance patterns may develop, such as 2D resonance patterns that typically occur within sediment-filled valleys. In this case, 2D resonance involves simultaneous vibration of the whole sedimentary infill at the same frequency, which may lead to large seismic amplification. 2D ground resonances can no longer be linked to the local depth-to-bedrock directly below the measurement site, but depend on the whole valley geometry and mechanic properties. Distinguishing between the 1D and 2D nature of a site is mandatory to avoid wrong stratigraphic and dynamic interpretations, which is in turn extremely relevant for seismic site response assessment.</p><p>We investigated the problem in the Bolzano sedimentary basin (Northern Italy), which lies at the intersection between three valleys, using a single-station microtremor approach, the same usually applied for H/V surveys. We observed that the footprints of 1D and 2D resonances reside in different behaviors along the three components of motion. This is because, while the dynamic behavior of a 1D-site is the same along all horizontal directions, 2D resonances differ along the longitudinal and transversal directions of the resonating body, e.g. parallel and perpendicular to the valley axis. In addition, 2D resonance modes involve also a vertical component. This implies that the H/V method, by mixing the information along the three components, is not suitable to detect 2D resonances, that can be acknowledged only by looking at the individual spectral components and not at the H/V curves alone.</p><p>By analyzing several hundred single-station microtremor measurements, we identified a list of frequency and amplitude features that characterize 1D and 2D resonances on individual spectral components of motion and on H/V ratios, on a single measurement and on several measurements acquired along profiles across the investigated valleys. We identified valleys characterized by 1D-only, 1D+2D and 2D-only resonance patterns and we propose a workflow scheme to conduct experimental measurements and data analysis in order to directly assess the 1D or 2D resonance nature of a site with a single-station approach, rather than evaluating this indirectly with numerical modelling.</p>


Author(s):  
Jawad Fayaz ◽  
Sarah Azar ◽  
Mayssa Dabaghi ◽  
Farzin Zareian

ABSTRACT A comprehensive methodology for the validation of simulated ground motions is presented. The suggested methodology can be geared toward any ground-motion simulation method and seismic response assessment, in a target engineering application. The methodology is founded on the comparison between conforming groups of ground-motion waveforms from recordings and simulations and their effect on a representative collection of structures that represent the engineering application. The comparison considers the statistics of earthquake scenarios at the level of the event and site parameters, the resulting waveform characteristics, and the subsequent structural responses. Regression models are developed at three levels (between structural responses and waveform characteristics, structural responses and event and site parameters, and waveform characteristics and event and site parameters). Similarities between the models from groups of recorded and simulated ground motions guide the validation process. The validation methodology is applied to CyberShake (v.15.12) simulations and for the estimation of the column drift ratio of a bridge structure. It is shown that CyberShake (v.15.12) can be used to assess the median seismic response of the used bridge. Some discrepancies between simulations and recordings are observed, which could be attributed to the basin and site-response models used for simulations. Further implementation and refinement of the suggested methodology are recommended to make broader conclusions.


2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Molnar ◽  
J F Cassidy ◽  
P A Monahan ◽  
T Onur ◽  
C Ventura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document