Health Care Providers’ Mindfulness and Treatment Outcomes: A Critical Review of the Research Literature

Mindfulness ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 242-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany F. Escuriex ◽  
Elise E. Labbé
2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-376 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. A. Zecevic ◽  
A. W. Salmoni ◽  
M. Speechley ◽  
A. A. Vandervoort

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 69
Author(s):  
Hamza AL-Quraan ◽  
Mohannad AbuRuz

<p>Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was introduced in 1974 as a tool to standardize the assessment of the level of consciousness of patients. Since it was introduced and used, GCS was considered to be the gold standard method for this purpose. Despite plenty of strengths GCS has (i.e. objectivity and easy communication on the results between the health care providers); GCS was considered to be ambiguous and confusing for nurses and infrequent users. Moreover, lack of knowledge and training about GCS might affect the accuracy and inter-rater reliability among health care professionals. The purpose of this paper was to simplify the use of GCS step by step for the beginner health care professionals.</p><p>This literature review was done by searching the following search engines: Pubmed, Midline, CINHAL, Ebsco host, and Google Scholar for the key words of: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), flow chart, nurses, and consciousness.Types of articles included: original research, literature review and meta-analysis. This review included the following sections:</p><p>1)     Definition of the related concepts</p><p>2)     The historical development of the GCS</p><p>3)     How to score the GCS</p><p>4)     Recommendation for clinical settings, and</p><p>5)     Conclusion</p>


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 773-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
KAREN E. STC. HAMILTON ◽  
VIVIEN COATES ◽  
BILLY KELLY ◽  
JENNIFER R. P. BOORE ◽  
Jill H. Cundell ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
ALLEN C. SHERMAN ◽  
DONNA EDWARDS ◽  
STEPHANIE SIMONTON ◽  
PAULETTE MEHTA

Purpose:Caring for patients with cancer can be taxing for front-line health care providers. The growing intensity of treatment protocols, in conjunction with staff shortages, reduced hospital stays, and broader pressures on the health care system may exacerbate these challenges, leading to increased risk for burnout. This article reviews the research literature regarding the prevalence of burnout and psychosocial distress among oncology providers, examines multifactorial occupational and personal determinants of risk, and considers intervention strategies to enhance resilience.Methods:Literature review of empirical peer-reviewed studies focusing on prevalence and correlates of burnout among oncology physicians and nurses.Results:Findings from a number of studies using validated measures and large samples suggest that prevalence rates for burnout and psychosocial distress are high among oncology staff, though not necessarily higher than in non-cancer-practice settings. A growing database has examined occupational (e.g., workload) and demographic (e.g., gender) factors that may contribute to risk, but there is less information about personal (e.g., coping) or organizational (e.g., staffing, physician–nurse relations) determinants or multilevel interactions among these factors. Oncologist burnout may adversely affect anticipated staff turnover. Other important endpoints (biological stress markers, health status, patient satisfaction, quality-of-care indices) have yet to be examined in the oncology setting. Intervention research is at a more rudimentary phase of development.Conclusions:Burnout and distress affect a significant proportion of oncology staff. There is a need for additional conceptually based, longitudinal, multivariate studies regarding burnout and its associated risk factors and consequences.


1988 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 341-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanne Quint Benoliel

Three major areas of concern can be identified in the relationship between health care providers and dying patients: a) the nature of the difficulties and stresses associated with terminal care, b) the education of providers for this kind of work, and c) the influence of organizational structure and institutionalized values on services for dying patients and their families. A review of the research literature indicates that obstacles to effective terminal care continue to exist at the personal, interpersonal, and social levels in the current American health care system. Particular attention is given to demonstrated differences among health care professionals in their sources of emotional support and to difficulties associated with innovations in terminal care. Recent developments such as the predetermined reimbursement for health care based on established diagnostic categories (DRGs) have the potential for generating further obstacles to the providers' efforts to function as one human being helping another.


1999 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-203
Author(s):  
Kendra Carlson

The Supreme Court of California held, in Delaney v. Baker, 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 610 (1999), that the heightened remedies available under the Elder Abuse Act (Act), Cal. Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 15657,15657.2 (West 1998), apply to health care providers who engage in reckless neglect of an elder adult. The court interpreted two sections of the Act: (1) section 15657, which provides for enhanced remedies for reckless neglect; and (2) section 15657.2, which limits recovery for actions based on “professional negligence.” The court held that reckless neglect is distinct from professional negligence and therefore the restrictions on remedies against health care providers for professional negligence are inapplicable.Kay Delaney sued Meadowood, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), after a resident, her mother, died. Evidence at trial indicated that Rose Wallien, the decedent, was left lying in her own urine and feces for extended periods of time and had stage I11 and IV pressure sores on her ankles, feet, and buttocks at the time of her death.


Author(s):  
Pauline A. Mashima

Important initiatives in health care include (a) improving access to services for disadvantaged populations, (b) providing equal access for individuals with limited or non-English proficiency, and (c) ensuring cultural competence of health-care providers to facilitate effective services for individuals from diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Minority Health, 2001). This article provides a brief overview of the use of technology by speech-language pathologists and audiologists to extend their services to underserved populations who live in remote geographic areas, or when cultural and linguistic differences impact service delivery.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document