Nutrient allocation for somatic maintenance and worker production by the queen of the Japanese black carpenter ant, Camponotus japonicus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 527-530
Author(s):  
Naoto Idogawa ◽  
Mamoru Watanabe ◽  
Tomoyuki Yokoi
2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (8) ◽  
pp. 836-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eriko Tsuji ◽  
Hitoshi Aonuma ◽  
Fumio Yokohari ◽  
Michiko Nishikawa

mBio ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko Koto ◽  
Masaru Konishi Nobu ◽  
Ryo Miyazaki

ABSTRACT Symbiotic microorganisms can have a profound impact on the host physiology and behavior, and novel relationships between symbionts and their hosts are continually discovered. A colony of social ants consists of various castes that exhibit distinct lifestyles and is, thus, a unique model for investigating how symbionts may be involved in host eusociality. Yet our knowledge of social ant-symbiont dynamics has remained rudimentary. Through 16S rRNA gene deep sequencing of the carpenter ant Camponotus japonicus symbiont community across various castes, we here report caste-dependent diversity of commensal gut microbiota and lineage divergence of “Candidatus Blochmannia,” an obligate endosymbiont. While most prevalent gut-associated bacterial populations are found across all castes (Alphaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Cyanobacteria), we also discovered uncultured populations that are found only in males (belonging to Corynebacteriales, Alkanindiges, and Burkholderia). Most of those populations are not detected in laboratory-maintained queens and workers, suggesting that they are facultative gut symbionts introduced via environmental acquisition. Further inspection of “Ca. Blochmannia” endosymbionts reveals that two populations are dominant in all individuals across all castes but that males preferentially contain two different sublineages that are diversified from others. Clearly, each caste has distinct symbiont communities, suggesting an overlooked biological aspect of host-symbiont interaction in social insects. IMPORTANCE Social animals, such as primates and some insects, have been shown to exchange symbiotic microbes among individuals through sharing diet or habitats, resulting in increased consistency of microbiota among social partners. The ant is a representative of social insects exhibiting various castes within a colony; queens, males, and nonreproductive females (so-called workers) show distinct morphologies, physiologies, and behaviors but tightly interact with each other in the nest. However, how this social context affects their gut microbiota has remained unclear. In this study, we deeply sequenced the gut symbiont community across various castes of the carpenter ant Camponotus japonicus. We report caste-dependent diversity of commensal gut microbial community and lineage divergence of the mutualistic endosymbiont “Candidatus Blochmannia.” This report sheds light on the hidden diversity in microbial populations and community structure associated with guts of males in social ants.


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaru K. Hojo ◽  
Kenichi Ishii ◽  
Midori Sakura ◽  
Katsushi Yamaguchi ◽  
Shuji Shigenobu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 80 (11) ◽  
pp. 2910-2916 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bora Shin ◽  
So Hyun Park ◽  
Byung-Yong Kim ◽  
Shin-Il Jo ◽  
Sang Kook Lee ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 800-806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natsume Nasu ◽  
Kenji Hara

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Hara

[Abstract]Brood accumulation, a fundamental behavior of offspring care in the carpenter ant Camponotus japonicus, is driven by alternation of ‘holding run’ and ‘empty-handed run’ behaviors. In the holding run, a worker holds a brood with her mandibles and carries it to the queen (holding run). After releasing it beside the queen, she hurries back to another brood (empty-handed run). To address the motivation for the brood-accumulation task, in this study, I observed these behaviors under experimental conditions. When workers performed the task in a situation that involved selection between their own and unfamiliar queens, they ran in significantly more restrictive ways during the holding run than during the empty-handed run. Hence, ‘holding’ represents a different motivational state than ‘empty-handed’. In a second experiment, the workers were suddenly presented with an unfamiliar floor during the task. Regardless of whether they were holding or empty-handed, their running traces on the familiar floor were simple, whereas on the unfamiliar floor they were more complex. These results show that holding workers would pay attention to the queen, exploiting cues on the floor to restrict their responses to the queen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document