Age prediction model for adult male Galapagos sea lions based on skull measures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salomé Izurieta-Benítez ◽  
Diego O. Urquía ◽  
Jorge Torres ◽  
Marjorie Riofrío-Lazo ◽  
Diego Páez-Rosas
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-90
Author(s):  
Charles V. Schwab ◽  
Lauren E. Schwab ◽  
Pamela J. Schwab

Abstract. One contributor to agriculture’s high death rate is confined space fatalities caused by entrapment in grain. Over 1,000 grain-related fatalities have been documented by researchers in 43 states, and states with the largest grain storage capacities have been shown to experience a proportionally larger number of suffocation fatalities. Several researchers have measured extraction forces in specific conditions, but a reference standard is needed for estimating the extraction forces for grain suffocation victims in common conditions. A prediction model for estimating extraction forces was developed using the principle of boundary shear, an approximation of human surface area, and a commonly accepted equation for lateral granular pressure. This research reintroduces the prediction model for extraction forces and explores several sensitivity analyses of the input variables. It also updates the anthropometric data used in the model calculations and produces extraction force estimates for adult male victims with different body shapes submerged below the grain surface. Results from the prediction model are presented graphically for common input variables, various entrapment depths, and adult male body shapes. Keywords: Farm safety, Grain suffocation, Prediction model, Rescue, Safety.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-Yuan Kuo ◽  
Tsung-Ming Tai ◽  
Pei-Lin Lee ◽  
Chiu-Wang Tseng ◽  
Chieh-Yu Chen ◽  
...  

Brain age is an imaging-based biomarker with excellent feasibility for characterizing individual brain health and may serve as a single quantitative index for clinical and domain-specific usage. Brain age has been successfully estimated using extensive neuroimaging data from healthy participants with various feature extraction and conventional machine learning (ML) approaches. Recently, several end-to-end deep learning (DL) analytical frameworks have been proposed as alternative approaches to predict individual brain age with higher accuracy. However, the optimal approach to select and assemble appropriate input feature sets for DL analytical frameworks remains to be determined. In the Predictive Analytics Competition 2019, we proposed a hierarchical analytical framework which first used ML algorithms to investigate the potential contribution of different input features for predicting individual brain age. The obtained information then served as a priori knowledge for determining the input feature sets of the final ensemble DL prediction model. Systematic evaluation revealed that ML approaches with multiple concurrent input features, including tissue volume and density, achieved higher prediction accuracy when compared with approaches with a single input feature set [Ridge regression: mean absolute error (MAE) = 4.51 years, R2 = 0.88; support vector regression, MAE = 4.42 years, R2 = 0.88]. Based on this evaluation, a final ensemble DL brain age prediction model integrating multiple feature sets was constructed with reasonable computation capacity and achieved higher prediction accuracy when compared with ML approaches in the training dataset (MAE = 3.77 years; R2 = 0.90). Furthermore, the proposed ensemble DL brain age prediction model also demonstrated sufficient generalizability in the testing dataset (MAE = 3.33 years). In summary, this study provides initial evidence of how-to efficiency for integrating ML and advanced DL approaches into a unified analytical framework for predicting individual brain age with higher accuracy. With the increase in large open multiple-modality neuroimaging datasets, ensemble DL strategies with appropriate input feature sets serve as a candidate approach for predicting individual brain age in the future.


2013 ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon R. Melin ◽  
Martin Haulena ◽  
William Van Bonn ◽  
Mathew J. Tennis ◽  
Robin F. Brown ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
pp. 22-49
Author(s):  
Jimena Bohórquez-Herrera ◽  
David Aurioles-Gamboa ◽  
Claudia Hernández-Camacho ◽  
Dean Adams

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document