Degree of approximation by Chlodowsky variant of Jakimovski–Leviatan–Durrmeyer type operators

Author(s):  
Trapti Neer ◽  
Ana Maria Acu ◽  
P. N. Agrawal
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
pp. 0
Author(s):  
Purshottam Narain Agrawal ◽  
Şule Yüksel Güngör ◽  
Abhishek Kumar

<p style='text-indent:20px;'>In the present article we investigate a Durrmeyer variant of the generalized Bernstein-operators based on a function <inline-formula><tex-math id="M1">\begin{document}$ \tau(x), $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><tex-math id="M2">\begin{document}$ \tau $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> is infinitely differentiable function on <inline-formula><tex-math id="M3">\begin{document}$ [0, 1], \; \tau(0) = 0, \tau(1) = 1 $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><tex-math id="M4">\begin{document}$ \tau^{\prime }(x)&gt;0, \;\forall\;\; x\in[0, 1]. $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> We study the degree of approximation by means of the modulus of continuity and the Ditzian-Totik modulus of smoothness. A Voronovskaja type asymptotic theorem and the approximation of functions with derivatives of bounded variation are also studied. By means of a numerical example, finally we illustrate the convergence of these operators to certain functions through graphs and show a careful choice of the function <inline-formula><tex-math id="M5">\begin{document}$ \tau(x) $\end{document}</tex-math></inline-formula> leads to a better approximation than the generalized Bernstein-Durrmeyer type operators considered by Kajla and Acar [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="b11">11</xref>].</p>


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Mishra ◽  
Vishnu Narayan Mishra ◽  
M. Mursaleen

AbstractIn this paper, we establish a new estimate for the degree of approximation of functions $f(x,y)$ f ( x , y ) belonging to the generalized Lipschitz class $Lip ((\xi _{1}, \xi _{2} );r )$ L i p ( ( ξ 1 , ξ 2 ) ; r ) , $r \geq 1$ r ≥ 1 , by double Hausdorff matrix summability means of double Fourier series. We also deduce the degree of approximation of functions from $Lip ((\alpha ,\beta );r )$ L i p ( ( α , β ) ; r ) and $Lip(\alpha ,\beta )$ L i p ( α , β ) in the form of corollary. We establish some auxiliary results on trigonometric approximation for almost Euler means and $(C, \gamma , \delta )$ ( C , γ , δ ) means.


Symmetry ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1016
Author(s):  
Camelia Liliana Moldovan ◽  
Radu Păltănea

The paper presents a multidimensional generalization of the Schoenberg operators of higher order. The new operators are powerful tools that can be used for approximation processes in many fields of applied sciences. The construction of these operators uses a symmetry regarding the domain of definition. The degree of approximation by sequences of such operators is given in terms of the first and the second order moduli of continuity. Extending certain results obtained by Marsden in the one-dimensional case, the property of preservation of monotonicity and convexity is proved.


Author(s):  
T. O. Petrova ◽  
I. P. Chulakov

We discuss whether on not it is possible to have interpolatory estimates in the approximation of a function $f є W^r [0,1]$ by polynomials. The problem of positive approximation is to estimate the pointwise degree of approximation of a function $f є C^r [0,1] \cap \Delta^0$ where $\Delta^0$ is the set of positive functions on [0,1]. Estimates of the form (1) for positive approximation are known ([1],[2]). The problem of monotone approximation is that of estimating the degree of approximation of a monotone nondecreasing function by monotone nondecreasing polynomials. Estimates of the form (1) for monotone approximation were proved in [3],[4],[8]. In [3],[4] is consider $r є , r > 2$. In [8] is consider $r є , r > 2$. It was proved that for monotone approximation estimates of the form (1) are fails for $r є , r > 2$. The problem of convex approximation is that of estimating the degree of approximation of a convex function by convex polynomials. The problem of convex approximation is that of estimating the degree of approximation of a convex function by convex polynomials. The problem of convex approximation is consider in ([5],[6]). In [5] is consider $r є , r > 2$. In [6] is consider $r є , r > 2$. It was proved that for convex approximation estimates of the form (1) are fails for $r є , r > 2$. In this paper the question of approximation of function $f є W^r \cap \Delta^1, r є (3,4)$ by algebraic polynomial $p_n є \Pi_n \cap \Delta^1$ is consider. The main result of the work generalize the result of work [8] for $r є (3,4)$.


1985 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Furuta

At first we investigate the similarity between the Kleinecke-Shirokov theorem for subnormal operators and the Fuglede-Putnam theorem and also we show an asymptotic version of this similarity. These results generalize results of Ackermans, van Eijndhoven and Martens. Also we show two theorems on degree of approximation on subnormal derivation ranges. These results generalize results of Stampfli on degree of approximation on normal derivation ranges. The purpose of this paper is to show that the Fuglede-Putnam-type theorem on normal operators can certainly be generalized to subnormal operators.


1995 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 201-201
Author(s):  
N. Capitaine ◽  
B. Guinot

In 1991, IAU Resolution A4 introduced General Relativity as the theoretical background for defining celestial space-time reference sytems. It is now essential that units and constants used in dynamical astronomy be defined in the same framework, at least in a manner which is compatible with the minimum degree of approximation of the metrics given in Resolution A4.This resolution states that astronomical constants and quantities should be expressed in SI units, but does not consider the use of astronomical units. We should first evaluate the usefulness of maintaining the system of astronomical units. If this system is kept, it must be defined in the spirit of Resolution A4. According to Huang T.-Y., Han C.-H., Yi Z.-H., Xu B.-X. (What is the astronomical unit of length?, to be published in Asttron. Astrophys.), the astronomical units for time and length are units for proper quantities and are therefore proper quantities. We fully concur with this point of view. Astronomical units are used to establish the system of graduation of coordinates which appear in ephemerides: the graduation units are not, properly speaking astronomical units. Astronomical constants, expressed in SI or astronomical units, are also proper quantities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document