scholarly journals Evidence-based medicine, shared decision making and the hidden curriculum: a qualitative content analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-180
Author(s):  
Emélie Braschi ◽  
Dawn Stacey ◽  
France Légaré ◽  
Roland Grad ◽  
Douglas Archibald
BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e037225
Author(s):  
Mary Simons ◽  
Frances Rapport ◽  
Yvonne Zurynski ◽  
Jeremy Cullis ◽  
Andrew Davidson

IntroductionPatient-centred care is pivotal to clinical practice and medical education. The practice of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and shared decision-making (SDM) are complementary aspects of patient-centred care, but they are frequently taught and reported as independent entities. To effectively perform all steps of EBM, clinicians need to include patients in SDM conversations, however, the uptake of this has been slow and inconsistent. A solution may be the incorporation of SDM into EBM training programmes, but such programmes do not routinely include SDM skills development. This scoping review will survey the literature on the kinds of EBM and SDM educational programmes that exist for recently qualified doctors, programmes that incorporate the teaching of both EBM and SDM skills, as well as identifying research gaps in the literature.Methods and analysisLiterature searches will be conducted in the databases Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane Library. Bibliographies of key articles and their citing references will also be hand-searched and assessed for inclusion. Selected grey literature will be included. Papers must be written in English, or provide English abstracts, and date from 1996 to the present day.Two independent reviewers will screen titles and abstracts, check full texts of selected papers for eligibility and extract the data. Any disagreement will be resolved, and consensus reached, if necessary, with the assistance of a third reviewer. Qualitative and quantitative studies that address educational interventions for either EBM, SDM or both will be included. Data extraction tables will present bibliographic information, populations, interventions, context and outcomes. Data will be summarised using tables and figures and a description of findings.Ethics and disseminationThis review will synthesise information from publicly available publications and does not require ethics approval. The results will be disseminated via conference presentations and publications in medical journals.


2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary R. McCaw ◽  
Ariela R. Orkaby ◽  
Lee-Jen Wei ◽  
Dae Hyun Kim ◽  
Michael W. Rich

2018 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison K. Ikeda ◽  
Paul Hong ◽  
Stacey L. Ishman ◽  
Stephanie A. Joe ◽  
Gregory W. Randolph ◽  
...  

In our previous installment, we introduced shared decision making (SDM) as a collaborative process in which patients, families, and clinicians develop a mutually optimized treatment plan when more than 1 reasonable treatment option exists. In this subsequent installment of our Evidence-Based Medicine in Otolaryngology Series, we expand on the topic of SDM, including the related current state of clinical decision making, the impact of SDM on health care utilization and patient satisfaction, the potential role of system and society changes, the experience with SDM as it relates to race and ethnicity, existing financial incentives, and the validated instruments that assess the extent to which SDM occurs.


JAMA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 312 (13) ◽  
pp. 1295 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tammy C. Hoffmann ◽  
Victor M. Montori ◽  
Chris Del Mar

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document