scholarly journals A Systematic Review of the Treat and Extend Treatment Regimen with Anti-VEGF Agents for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 79-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Gemenetzi ◽  
Praveen J. Patel
2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianqing Li ◽  
Jiayi Xu ◽  
Yiyi Chen ◽  
Jiaju Zhang ◽  
Yihong Cao ◽  
...  

Purpose. Intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has been widely used for the treatment of neovascularization (NV) secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). This study aimed to compare the efficacy among different subtypes of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods. PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. We performed meta-analysis using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata/SE 12.0. Results. A total of 24 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review. At 3 months, the mean logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) improvements were −0.09, −0.18, and −0.23 for type 1, 2, and 3, respectively, while the mean macular thickness (MT) changes were −104.83, −130.76, and −196.29 μm. At 12 months, the mean changes in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters were 6.38, 8.12, and 9.37, while the MT decrease was 126.51, 126.52, and 139.85 μm, respectively. However, statistically significant difference was only found between type 1 and 3 in vision improvement, both in the short term (p=0.0002) and long term (p=0.01). Conclusions. The reactivity to VEGF inhibitors varied among different subtypes of nAMD. The efficacy of intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy in type 3 nAMD was statistically better than type 1 when considering vision improvement at 3 and 12 months. Thus, the lesion subtype is a predictor for the treatment outcome which can help guide prognosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-174
Author(s):  
A.B. Durasov ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a progressive chronic multifactorial disease requiring long-term, lifelong anti- VEGF therapy. Treatment outcomes are not always in line with the results of randomized clinical trials and do not meet the expectations for therapy whose success is assessed differently by patients and physicians. Good functional and anatomical results are expected from antivasoproliferative therapy under certain conditions, e.g., accurate evaluation of some patient characteristics (baseline visual acuity, type of choroidal neovascularization, comorbidities, status of retinal fluid and its differentiation), timely (as early as possible) treatment initiation after verifying diagnosis, and strict adherence to a proactive personalized "Treat-and-Extend" (T&E) regimen that implies a required number of injections with individual intervals. Poor adherence to treatment (non-compliance or nonpersistence of anti-VEGF therapy) significantly affects treatment outcomes in real-world clinical practice. This paper reviews criteria which predict the response to antivasoproliferative therapy and improving treatment adherence. The authors describe four fundamental principles to be met by an ideal regimen of anti-VEGF therapy for nAMD. Keywords: neovascular age-related macular degeneration, nAMD, "Treat-and-Extend", T&E, adherence, nonpersistence, anti-VEGF. For citation: Durasov A.B. Treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: reasonable expectations of physicians and patients. Russian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology. 2021;21(3):169–174 (in Russ.). DOI: 10.32364/2311-7729-2021-21-3-169-174.


2022 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000930
Author(s):  
Tora Sund Morken ◽  
Christina Knutsen ◽  
Margrete Sætre Hanssen ◽  
Dordi Austeng

ObjectiveStandard treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is intravitreal injections (IVI) of antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) according to treat-and-extend (TnE). Observe-and-plan (OnP), a new regimen based on each individual’s relapse interval lead to fewer clinical visits and has so far shown to be safe in treatment-naïve patients. In this study, we explore patient satisfaction and safety in nAMD when switching from TnE to OnP.Methods and analysis38 participants treated acording to TnE for ≥12 months were included and switched from TnE to OnP with their last stable interval. Main outcome was patient satisfaction (Leeds Satisfaction Questionnaire). Secondary outcomes were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) before and 12 months after switch and number of monitoring visits and injections of anti-VEGF 12 months prior to and following switch.ResultsMean patient satisfaction was higher (3.7±0.5 SD) at 12 months after switch from TnE to OnP than before (3.6±0.5 SD, p=0.009, response rate 76%). BCVA and CRT were unchanged. Number of monitoring visits and injections were lower in the 12 months following than prior to switch (p<0.001).ConclusionA switch from TnE to OnP in a non-treatment-naïve population resulted in higher patient satisfaction, while maintaining stable BCVA. This indicates that OnP may be applicable in the large group of nAMD patients that have received IVI for several years. OnP may alleviate the treatment burden on both individual and society of frequent clinical visits while increasing patient satisfaction.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Tae Kim ◽  
Ju Byung Chae ◽  
Seungheon Lee ◽  
Eoi Jong Seo ◽  
Dong Yoon Kim

Abstract Background To analyze the long-term effects of persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) on visual/anatomic outcomes according to the type of macular neovascularization (MNV) during relaxed treat-and-extend regimen with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) patients. Methods Patients with fovea-involving type 1 or type 2 MNV, treated with a relaxed treat-and-extend regimen for 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Eyes with SRF observed more than three times per year were defined as the ‘persistent SRF (+) group’. To exclude the effects of IRF as much as possible, the eyes with persistent IRF were excluded. The effects of persistent SRF on the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield retinal thickness (CST), and changes in the photoreceptor layer (PRL) thickness and outer retinal bands (external limiting membrane, ellipsoid zone, and cone outer segment tip line) after anti-VEGF injection were analyzed for each MNV type. Results Seventy-seven eyes with type 1 MNV (44 eyes with persistent SRF) and 53 eyes with type 2 MNV (18 eyes with persistent SRF) were enrolled. Following a relaxed treat-and-extend regimen with anti-VEGF agents, BCVA and CST improved for each MNV type. In comparison between persistent SRF (+) and persistent SRF (−) group, there were no differences in the amount of change in BCVA and CST between the two groups for each MNV type during 2-year follow-up periods. In addition, there were no differences in the amount of reduction in PRL thickness and state of the outer retinal bands between the two groups for each MNV type. Conclusions Using a relaxed treat-and-extend regimen with anti-VEGF agents, persistent SRF did not have additional effects on visual and anatomic outcomes by 2 years, regardless of the MNV type.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document