scholarly journals Bayesian Methods for Calibrating Health Policy Models: A Tutorial

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 613-624 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas A. Menzies ◽  
Djøra I. Soeteman ◽  
Ankur Pandya ◽  
Jane J. Kim
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad S Jalali ◽  
Catherine DiGennaro ◽  
Abby Guitar ◽  
Karen Lew ◽  
Hazhir Rahmandad

Abstract Simulation models are increasingly used to inform epidemiological studies and health policy, yet there is great variation in their transparency and reproducibility. This review provides an overview of applications of simulation models in health policy and epidemiology, analyzes the use of best reporting practices, and assesses the reproducibility of the models using predefined, categorical criteria. 1,613 studies were identified and analyzed. We found an exponential growth in the number of studies over the past half century, with the highest growth in dynamic modeling approaches. The largest subset of studies is focused on disease policy models (70%), within which pathological conditions, viral diseases, neoplasms, and cardiovascular diseases account for one-third of the articles. Nearly half of the studies do not report the details of their models. We also provide in depth analysis of modeling best practices, reporting quality and reproducibility for a subset of 100 articles (50 highly cited and 50 random). Only seven of 26 in-depth evaluation criteria were satisfied by more than 80% of samples. We identify areas for increased application of simulation modeling and opportunities to enhance the rigor and documentation in the conduct and reporting of simulation modeling in epidemiology and health policy.


2009 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra W. Kuntz ◽  
Charlene A. Winters ◽  
Wade G. Hill ◽  
Clarann Weinert ◽  
Kimberly Rowse ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 577-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garnett P. McMillan ◽  
John B. Cannon

Purpose This article presents a basic exploration of Bayesian inference to inform researchers unfamiliar to this type of analysis of the many advantages this readily available approach provides. Method First, we demonstrate the development of Bayes' theorem, the cornerstone of Bayesian statistics, into an iterative process of updating priors. Working with a few assumptions, including normalcy and conjugacy of prior distribution, we express how one would calculate the posterior distribution using the prior distribution and the likelihood of the parameter. Next, we move to an example in auditory research by considering the effect of sound therapy for reducing the perceived loudness of tinnitus. In this case, as well as most real-world settings, we turn to Markov chain simulations because the assumptions allowing for easy calculations no longer hold. Using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, we can illustrate several analysis solutions given by a straightforward Bayesian approach. Conclusion Bayesian methods are widely applicable and can help scientists overcome analysis problems, including how to include existing information, run interim analysis, achieve consensus through measurement, and, most importantly, interpret results correctly. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7822592


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document