History of the Marketing Department and Its Doctoral Program—1900 to 2021

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Assael ◽  
C. Samuel Craig ◽  
Tȕlin Erdem ◽  
Geeta Menon ◽  
Priya Raghubir
Keyword(s):  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Marketing Department ◽  
History Of

Features of Doctoral Programs in America and Their Historical Roots

2020 ◽  
pp. 14-20
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Education ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Recent History ◽  
Doctorate Degree ◽  
Common Features ◽  
History Of

This chapter continues to discuss developments in the history of doctoral program, including the initial Ph.D. degree in education and the move towards the new Educational Doctorate degree (Ed.D.). The chapter moves to more recent history of Ph.D. and Ed.D. programs in America and the consistent movement towards specialization. A renewed focus on standardization is illustrated by discussing some of the developments in the specialized field of mathematics education over the last 20 years. The chapter finishes by listing the basic components that are typical of most doctoral programs in education in America. These common features are the focus of the next several chapters.

Design of an Online Community of Practice to Support an Emerging Doctoral Culture

2010 ◽  
pp. 117-126
Author(s):  
James M. Monaghan
Keyword(s):  
Communities Of Practice ◽  
Community Of Practice ◽  
Online Community ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
State University ◽  
Track Record ◽  
History Of ◽  
Online Community Of Practice ◽  
Online Communities Of Practice

During the initial accreditation process for California State University, San Bernardino (CSUSB)’s new doctorate in educational leadership, the accrediting body, the Western Association of Schools and Colleges (WASC), presented the institution with a serious concern. Reviewers of CSUSB’s proposal to offer their first doctorate indicated that the institution did not have a history of a doctoral culture. The challenge was how to acculturate students into a doctoral culture in the absence of an established doctoral culture? The university proposed to leverage their track record creating and nurturing departmental online communities of practice by creating and nurturing a similar community of practice for scholars in the doctoral program. This online community of practice was intended to provide scaffolding which was similar to that which occurs in full-time doctoral programs where faculty and students regularly interact in both formal and informal settings. In designing the online community of practice, the Office of Distributed Learning built upon the expertise developed in the successful implementation of similar communities of practice for numerous departments across the campus.

Dissertation Redesign for Scholarly Practitioners in Educational Leadership

2016 ◽  
pp. 53-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia J. MacGregor ◽  
Jennifer Fellabaum
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
University Of Missouri ◽  
History Of ◽  
Critical Problems ◽  
Problems Of Practice ◽  
The University ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Section Form

The purpose of this chapter is to describe the innovative Dissertation-in-Practice model being implemented in the University of Missouri Statewide Cooperative Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership (EdD Program). This doctoral program develops scholarly practitioners who are able to address critical problems of practice through the use of theory, inquiry, and practice-oriented knowledge. While these skills are utilized to create purposeful, professional products throughout the program, the redesigned Dissertation-in-Practice at MU is intended to further showcase the impact of the students' work as scholarly practitioners through dissemination-ready components. The chapter includes the history of the program and a description of the process through which program faculty redesigned the dissertation from a traditional five-chapter model to its current six section form. This restructuring, which includes dissemination to scholars and practitioners, is detailed. The chapter concludes with emerging supports for the scholarly practitioner graduates.

Dissertation Redesign for Scholarly Practitioners in Educational Leadership

2017 ◽  
pp. 541-557
Author(s):  
Cynthia J. MacGregor ◽  
Jennifer Fellabaum
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
University Of Missouri ◽  
History Of ◽  
Critical Problems ◽  
Problems Of Practice ◽  
The University ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Section Form

The purpose of this chapter is to describe the innovative Dissertation-in-Practice model being implemented in the University of Missouri Statewide Cooperative Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership (EdD Program). This doctoral program develops scholarly practitioners who are able to address critical problems of practice through the use of theory, inquiry, and practice-oriented knowledge. While these skills are utilized to create purposeful, professional products throughout the program, the redesigned Dissertation-in-Practice at MU is intended to further showcase the impact of the students' work as scholarly practitioners through dissemination-ready components. The chapter includes the history of the program and a description of the process through which program faculty redesigned the dissertation from a traditional five-chapter model to its current six section form. This restructuring, which includes dissemination to scholars and practitioners, is detailed. The chapter concludes with emerging supports for the scholarly practitioner graduates.

The Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education in Social Work

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Lightfoot ◽  
Raiza Beltran
Keyword(s):  
Social Work ◽  
Doctoral Education ◽  
Doctoral Programs ◽  
Work Organization ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Vital Role ◽  
Work Organizations ◽  
The Social ◽  
History Of ◽  
Phd Programs

The Group for the Advancement of Doctoral Education in Social Work (GADE) is the social work organization committed to promoting rigor in North American social work and social welfare doctoral program. GADE plays a vital role in supporting social work doctoral programs in training future social work researchers, scholars, and educators. GADE develops and updates the aspirational guidelines for quality in PhD programs, provides support to doctoral programs and doctoral program directors in program administration, collaborates with other national and international social work organizations, and serves as the leading voice for doctoral education in the field. This article traces the history of GADE from the early beginnings of social work doctoral education in the early 20th century, through the establishment of GADE in the 1977 to promote the research doctorate, and ending with GADE’s activities today.

Dissertation Redesign for Scholarly Practitioners in Educational Leadership

2016 ◽  
pp. 357-373
Author(s):  
Cynthia J. MacGregor ◽  
Jennifer Fellabaum
Keyword(s):  
Educational Leadership ◽  
Doctoral Program ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
University Of Missouri ◽  
History Of ◽  
Critical Problems ◽  
Problems Of Practice ◽  
The University ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Section Form

The purpose of this chapter is to describe the innovative Dissertation-in-Practice model being implemented in the University of Missouri Statewide Cooperative Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership (EdD Program). This doctoral program develops scholarly practitioners who are able to address critical problems of practice through the use of theory, inquiry, and practice-oriented knowledge. While these skills are utilized to create purposeful, professional products throughout the program, the redesigned Dissertation-in-Practice at MU is intended to further showcase the impact of the students' work as scholarly practitioners through dissemination-ready components. The chapter includes the history of the program and a description of the process through which program faculty redesigned the dissertation from a traditional five-chapter model to its current six section form. This restructuring, which includes dissemination to scholars and practitioners, is detailed. The chapter concludes with emerging supports for the scholarly practitioner graduates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document