scholarly journals Edge Metric Dimension of Some Graph Operations

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 2465-2477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iztok Peterin ◽  
Ismael G. Yero
Author(s):  
Virdina Rahmayanti ◽  
Moh. Imam Utoyo ◽  
Liliek Susilowati

Adjacency metric dimension and local adjacency metric dimension are the development of metric dimension. The purpose of this research is to determine the adjacency metric dimension of corona graph between any connected graph G and non-trivial graph H denoted by dimA(G⊙H), to determine the local adjacency metric dimension of corona graph between any connected graph G and non-trivial graph H denoted by dimA,l(G⊙H), and to determine the correlation between adjacency metric dimension and local adjacency metric dimension of corona product graph operations. In this research, it is found out that the value of adjacency metric dimension of G⊙H graph is affected by the basic characteristic of H and the domination characteristic. Meanwhile, the value of local adjacency metric dimension of G⊙H graph is only affected by the basic characteristic of H Futhermore, it is found a correlation of adjacency metric dimension and local adjacency metric dimension of corona product graph between any connected graph G and non-trivial graph H.


Author(s):  
Liliek Susilowati ◽  
Mohammad ImamUtoyo ImamUtoyo ◽  
Sla min

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 301-309
Author(s):  
A. Bharali ◽  
Amitav Doley

10.37236/1734 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Arthur

An arc-representation of a graph is a function mapping each vertex in the graph to an arc on the unit circle in such a way that adjacent vertices are mapped to intersecting arcs. The width of such a representation is the maximum number of arcs passing through a single point. The arc-width of a graph is defined to be the minimum width over all of its arc-representations. We extend the work of Barát and Hajnal on this subject and develop a generalization we call restricted arc-width. Our main results revolve around using this to bound arc-width from below and to examine the effect of several graph operations on arc-width. In particular, we completely describe the effect of disjoint unions and wedge sums while providing tight bounds on the effect of cones.


2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 1303-1309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghulam Abbas ◽  
Usman Ali ◽  
Mobeen Munir ◽  
Syed Ahtsham Ul Haq Bokhary ◽  
Shin Min Kang

Abstract Classical applications of resolving sets and metric dimension can be observed in robot navigation, networking and pharmacy. In the present article, a formula for computing the metric dimension of a simple graph wihtout singleton twins is given. A sufficient condition for the graph to have the exchange property for resolving sets is found. Consequently, every minimal resolving set in the graph forms a basis for a matriod in the context of independence defined by Boutin [Determining sets, resolving set and the exchange property, Graphs Combin., 2009, 25, 789-806]. Also, a new way to define a matroid on finite ground is deduced. It is proved that the matroid is strongly base orderable and hence satisfies the conjecture of White [An unique exchange property for bases, Linear Algebra Appl., 1980, 31, 81-91]. As an application, it is shown that the power graphs of some finite groups can define a matroid. Moreover, we also compute the metric dimension of the power graphs of dihedral groups.


Algorithmica ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Édouard Bonnet ◽  
Nidhi Purohit

AbstractA resolving set S of a graph G is a subset of its vertices such that no two vertices of G have the same distance vector to S. The Metric Dimension problem asks for a resolving set of minimum size, and in its decision form, a resolving set of size at most some specified integer. This problem is NP-complete, and remains so in very restricted classes of graphs. It is also W[2]-complete with respect to the size of the solution. Metric Dimension has proven elusive on graphs of bounded treewidth. On the algorithmic side, a polynomial time algorithm is known for trees, and even for outerplanar graphs, but the general case of treewidth at most two is open. On the complexity side, no parameterized hardness is known. This has led several papers on the topic to ask for the parameterized complexity of Metric Dimension with respect to treewidth. We provide a first answer to the question. We show that Metric Dimension parameterized by the treewidth of the input graph is W[1]-hard. More refinedly we prove that, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails, there is no algorithm solving Metric Dimension in time $$f(\text {pw})n^{o(\text {pw})}$$ f ( pw ) n o ( pw ) on n-vertex graphs of constant degree, with $$\text {pw}$$ pw the pathwidth of the input graph, and f any computable function. This is in stark contrast with an FPT algorithm of Belmonte et al. (SIAM J Discrete Math 31(2):1217–1243, 2017) with respect to the combined parameter $$\text {tl}+\Delta$$ tl + Δ , where $$\text {tl}$$ tl is the tree-length and $$\Delta$$ Δ the maximum-degree of the input graph.


2021 ◽  
Vol 300 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jelena Sedlar ◽  
Riste Škrekovski

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Radhakrishnan ◽  
M. Suresh ◽  
V. Mohana Selvi

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Nikandish ◽  
M. J. Nikmehr ◽  
M. Bakhtyiari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document