scholarly journals Distributed governance of Solar Radiation Management geoengineering: A possible solution to SRM’s “free-driver” problem?

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 551-556
Author(s):  
Andrew Lockley

Abstract Geoengineering (deliberate climate modification) is a possible way to limit Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) (Shepherd, 2009; National Research Council, 2015). Solar Radiation Management geoengineering (SRM) offers relatively inexpensive, rapid temperature control. However, this low cost leads to a risk of controversial unilateral intervention—the “free-driver” problem (Weitzman, 2015). Consequently, this creates a risk of counter-geoengineering (deliberate warming) (Parker et al., 2018), resulting in governance challenges (Svoboda, 2017) akin to an arms race. Free-driver deployment scenarios previously considered include the rogue state, Greenfinger (Bodansky, 2013), or power blocs (Ricke et al., 2013), implying disagreement and conflict. We propose a novel distributed governance model of consensually-constrained unilateralism: Countries’ authority is limited to each state’s fraction of the maximum realistic intervention (e.g., pre-industrial temperature). We suggest a division of authority based on historical emissions (Rocha et al., 2015)—noting alternatives (e.g., population). To aid understanding, we offer an analogue: An over-heated train carriage, with passenger-controlled windows. We subsequently discuss the likely complexities, notably Coasian side-payments. Finally, we suggest further research: Algebraic, bot and human modeling; and observational studies.

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 211-220
Author(s):  
Felix Hermerschmidt ◽  
Panayiotis D. Pouloupatis ◽  
George Partasides ◽  
Andreas Lizides ◽  
Stella Hadjiyiannakou ◽  
...  

Climate Law ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (2-4) ◽  
pp. 210-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cymie R. Payne ◽  
Rachael Shwom ◽  
Samantha Heaton

As the international community comes to grips with climate destabilization, it has begun to evaluate potentially risky technologies, such as geoengineering, to mitigate the effects of warming. The geoengineering technology known as solar-radiation management (srm) poses many risks. There is also great uncertainty about whether society will decide to deploy srm in the future. Managing these risks and uncertainties requires adaptive governance that will be responsive to new knowledge and changing social systems. We analyse the dimensions of public participation and norm-formation mechanisms of current srm-related legal regimes and governance proposals. We find that there is a need for the social sciences, including legal and governance scholars, to engage with the theoretical and pragmatic challenges of engaging diverse and vulnerable publics fairly and efficiently.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document