scholarly journals Evaluation of tramadol human pharmacokinetics and safety after co-administration of magnesium ions in randomized, single- and multiple-dose studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 604-614
Author(s):  
Piotr J. Rudzki ◽  
Katarzyna Jarus-Dziedzic ◽  
Monika Filist ◽  
Edyta Gilant ◽  
Katarzyna Buś-Kwaśnik ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Magnesium ions (Mg2+) increase and prolong opioid analgesia in chronic and acute pain. The nature of this synergistic analgesic interaction has not yet been explained. Our aim was to investigate whether Mg2+ alter tramadol pharmacokinetics. Our secondary goal was to assess the safety of the combination. Methods Tramadol was administered to healthy Caucasian subjects with and without Mg2+ as (1) single 100-mg and (2) multiple 50-mg oral doses. Mg2+ was administered orally at doses of 150 mg and 75 mg per tramadol dosing in a single- and multiple-dose study, respectively. Both studies were randomized, open label, laboratory-blinded, two-period, two-treatment, crossover trials. The plasma concentrations of tramadol and its active metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol, were measured. Results A total of 25 and 26 subjects completed the single- and multiple-dose study, respectively. Both primary and secondary pharmacokinetic parameters were similar. The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC0-t geometric mean ratios for tramadol were 91.95–102.40% and 93.22–102.76%. The 90% confidence intervals for Cmax,ss and AUC0-τ geometric mean ratios for tramadol were 93.85–103.31% and 99.04–105.27%. The 90% confidence intervals for primary pharmacokinetic parameters were within the acceptance range. ANOVA did not show any statistically significant contribution of the formulation factor (p > 0.05) in either study. Adverse events and clinical safety were similar in the presence and absence of Mg2+. Conclusions The absence of Mg2+ interaction with tramadol pharmacokinetics and safety suggests that this combination may be used in the clinical practice for the pharmacotherapy of pain. Graphic abstract

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 4840-4844 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. L. la Porte ◽  
J. P. Sabo ◽  
L. Béïque ◽  
D. W. Cameron

ABSTRACT Previously it has been shown that tipranavir-ritonavir (TPV/r) does not affect efavirenz (EFV) plasma concentrations. This study investigates the effect of steady-state EFV on steady-state TPV/r pharmacokinetics. This was a single-center, open-label, multiple-dose study of healthy adult female and male volunteers. TPV/r 500/200 mg twice a day (BID) was given with food for 24 days. After dosing with TPV/r for 10 days, EFV 600 mg once a day was added to the regimen. Intensive pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling was done on days 10 and 24. Validated bioanalytical high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods were used to determine plasma tipranavir (TPV), ritonavir (RTV), and EFV concentrations. Thirty-four subjects were entered into the study, and 16 subjects completed it. The geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) for TPV and RTV area under the curves, C maxs, and C mins comparing TPV/r alone and in combination with EFV were 0.97 (0.87 to 1.09), 0.92 (0.81 to 1.03), and 1.19 (0.93 to 1.54) for TPV and 1.03 (0.78 to 1.38), 0.92 (0.65 to 1.30), and 1.04 (0.72 to 1.48) for RTV. Frequently observed adverse events were diarrhea, headache, dizziness, abnormal dreams, and rash. EFV had no effect on the steady-state PK of TPV or RTV, with the exception of a 19% increase in the TPV C min, which is not clinically relevant. TPV/r can be safely coadministered with EFV and without the need for a dose adjustment.


2004 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
SK Garg ◽  
DK Badyal ◽  
S Majumdar

A cross-over and multiple dose study was carried out to find out possible pharmacokinetic interactions between phenytoin (DPH 35 ma/kg; p.o.) and antihypertensives enalapril (1.6 mg/kg; p.o.) and amlodipine (0.4 mg/kg, p.o.) in rhesus monkeys. Neither the plasma concentrations nor the pharmacokinetic parameters of DPH were altered by coadministration of enalapril or amlodipine, suggesting that enalapril and amlodipine can be safely administered to epileptic patients receiving phenytoin.


2013 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh Mallikaarjun ◽  
John M. Kane ◽  
Patricia Bricmont ◽  
Robert McQuade ◽  
William Carson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 3720-3725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ann M. Ginsberg ◽  
Martino W. Laurenzi ◽  
Doris J. Rouse ◽  
Karl D. Whitney ◽  
Melvin K. Spigelman

ABSTRACT PA-824 is a novel antibacterial agent that has shown in vitro activity against both drug-sensitive and drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The compound's MIC is between 0.015 and 0.25 μg/ml for drug-sensitive strains and between 0.03 and 0.53 μg/ml for drug-resistant strains. In addition, it is active against nonreplicating anaerobic Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of PA-824 were evaluated in two escalating-dose clinical studies, one a single-dose study and the other a multiple-dose study (up to 7 days of daily dosing). In 58 healthy subjects dosed with PA-824 in these studies, the drug candidate was well tolerated, with no significant or serious adverse events. In both studies, following oral administration PA-824 reached maximal plasma levels in 4 to 5 h independently of the dose. Maximal blood levels averaged approximately 3 μg/ml (1,500-mg dose) in the single-dose study and 3.8 μg/ml (600-mg dose) in the multiple-dose study. Steady state was achieved after 5 to 6 days of daily dosing, with an accumulation ratio of approximately 2. The elimination half-life averaged 16 to 20 h. Overall, PA-824 was well tolerated following oral doses once daily for up to 7 days, and pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent with a once-a-day regimen. The results of these studies, combined with the demonstrated activity of PA-824 against drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis, support the investigation of this novel compound for the treatment of tuberculosis.


2015 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ioana Todor ◽  
Adina Popa ◽  
Maria Neag ◽  
Dana Muntean ◽  
Corina Bocsan ◽  
...  

Background and aims. To evaluate the effects of paroxetine on the pharmacokinetics of atomoxetine and its main metabolite, 4-hydroxyatomoxetine-O-glucuronide, after coadministration of atomoxetine and paroxetine in healthy volunteers.Methods. 22 healthy volunteers, extensive metabolizers, took part in this open-label, non-randomized, clinical trial. The study consisted of two periods: Reference, when a single oral dose of 25 mg atomoxetine was administrated to each subject and Test, when 25 mg atomoxetine  and 20 mg paroxetine were coadministered. Between the two periods, the volunteers received an oral daily dose of 20-40 mg paroxetine, for 6 days. Atomoxetine and 4-hydroxyatomoxetine-O-glucuronide plasma concentrations were determined within the first 48 hours following drug administration. The pharmacokinetic parameters of both compounds were assessed using a non-compartmental method and the analysis of variance aimed at identifying any statistical significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters of atomoxetine and its main metabolite, corresponding to each study period.Results. Paroxetine modified the pharmacokinetic parameters of atomoxetine. Cmax increased from 221.26±94.93 to 372.53±128.28 ng/mL, while AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ also increased from 1151.19±686.52 to 6452.37±3388.76 ng*h/mL, and from 1229.15±751.04 to 7111.74±4195.17 ng*h/mL respectively. The main metabolite pharmacokinetics was also influenced by paroxetine intake, namely Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ decreased from 688.76±270.27 to 131.01±100.43 ng*h/mL, and from 4810.93±845.06 to 2606.04±923.88 and from 4928.55±853.25 to 3029.82 ±941.84 respectively.Conclusions. Multiple-dose paroxetine intake significantly influenced atomoxetine and its active metabolite pharmacokinetics, causing a 5.8-fold increased exposure to atomoxetine and 1.6-fold reduced exposure to 4-hydroxyatomoxetine-O-glucuronide.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xueyuan Zhang ◽  
Huanhuan Qi ◽  
Manman Wang ◽  
Yuhuan Ji ◽  
Chunlei Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics and safety of Liposomal Amphotericin B for injection in healthy Chinese volunteers based on a pilot bioequivalence clinical trial between a generic formulation and Ambisome ® Methods: This randomized, two sequence, open label, single dose,two period crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers at the dose of 2mg kg Blood samples were collected at pre defined time points up to 674 h after the start of the 2 h infusion. Plasma concentrations of total, unencapsulated and encapsulated amphotericin B were determined. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using non compartmental model . The formulations were considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence interval ls (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio of C max and AUC of both products for free and encapsulated amphotericin B were within80.00 1 25.00 for L n transformed data. Results and conclusion: All the 12subjects completed the two period study , no subjects withdrew the study. The plasma pharmacokinetic profile of liposomal amphotericin B based on free, encapsulated and total amphotericin B demonstrated the characteristics of a three compartment al model. The majority drug in the circulating system after IV infusion of liposomal amphotericin B is remained liposomal form . Pharmacokinetic behaviors in Chinese population w ere consistent with that in western healthy population based on total and unbound amphotericin B concentrations in plasma. The generic liposomal amphotericin B for injection is bioequivalent to Ambisome ® in terms of the Pharmacokinetic parameters for free, encapsulated and total amphotericin B. Trial registration number at National Medical Products Administration CTR20200885 . Date of registration: May 22 , 20 2 0.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document