scholarly journals Femoral Neck Osteotomy: A Salvage Procedure for Unstable and Locked Acetabulum Fractures in Selected Frail Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Cibura ◽  
Emre Yilmaz ◽  
Dina Straeter ◽  
Thomas A. Schildhauer ◽  
Christiane Kruppa
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Operative Procedure ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Salvage Procedure ◽  
Frail Patients ◽  
Femoral Neck Osteotomy

Abstract Introduction Purpose of the study is to present and discuss the femoral neck osteotomy as a salvage procedure for unstable, locked geriatric acetabular fractures in selected frail patients. When disadvantages and possible risks of other treatments exceed the benefits, this method may relieve pain and allow for early wheelchair mobilization in frail patients with limited mobility. Materials and Methods We report nine patients from 2008 to 2020, which were treated with an osteotomy of the femoral neck for an unstable acetabular fracture. Indications, ASA-Score, Frailty Index, operative procedure, length of hospital stay, complications and outcomes will be discussed. Results Patient’s age averaged 86 years (range 81–92). Acetabular fractures were classified as six both column fractures, two anterior column posterior hemitransversal fractures and one destruction of the acetabulum by multiple metastases. Fracture dislocation with medialization plus locking of the femoral head and a superomedial dome impaction were present in all patients. All patients were classified as ASA III/ IV and the average value on the CSHA Frailty index was 7 (range 6–7). The operation time averaged 52 min (range 34–62). Immediate wheelchair mobilization in seven out of nine patients was started postoperatively. Conclusion The osteotomy of the femoral neck may be discussed as a salvage procedure in low functional demanding, multimorbid, frail geriatric patients with unstable acetabular fractures and impairment of mobilisation due to a locked femoral head. The procedure has the advantages of a short operation time and immediate mobilization of the patients. However, this procedure only applies as a salvage solution in selected individual cases.

scholarly journals Comparison of early clinical results for the femoral neck system and cannulated screws in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqiang Zhou ◽  
Zhiqiang Li ◽  
Renjie Xu ◽  
Yuanshi She ◽  
Xiangxin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Femoral Head Necrosis ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss

Abstract Objective: To compare early clinical effects of the femoral neck system (FNS) and three cannulated screws for the treatment of patients with unstable femoral neck fractures.Methods: A retrospective analysis with pair matching of 81 patients who received FNS or cannulated screw internal fixation for Pauwels type-3 femoral neck fracture in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2019 was conducted. Patients who received FNS were the test group, and those who received cannulated screws comprised the control group. Matching requirements were as follows: same sex, similar age and similar body mass index (BMI). A total of 30 pairs were successfully matched, and the average age was 53.84 years. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, time to walking without crutches, Harris score, femoral head necrosis rate and complication rate were compared between the groups.Results: Postoperative re-examination of radiographs showed satisfactory reduction in all patients, and all patients were followed up for 10-22 months. Those in the FNS group had lower postoperative VAS scores, earlier times to walking without crutches, higher Harris scores at the last follow-up and lower complication rates (P<0.05). However, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization costs were greater in the FNS group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference in operation time, hospital stay or femoral head necrosis rate was observed between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion: For patients with unstable femoral neck fractures, FNS has better clinical efficacy than cannulated screws, though it is also more expensive. The excellent biomechanical performance and clinical efficacy of FNS make it a new choice for the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.

scholarly journals Restoration of neglected fracture dislocation hip in elderly: a case report

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 106
Author(s):  
Praveen Raj ◽  
Kaustav Mukherjee ◽  
Gokul Raj Dhanrajan ◽  
Sundararaja Bhaskar ◽  
Pradeep Jayaram Purushothaman
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Head ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Fatty Tissue ◽  
Traumatic Fracture ◽  
Fracture Dislocations ◽  
Dislocation Of The Hip

<p class="abstract">Neglected traumatic fracture dislocation of the hip is a challenging problem due to soft tissue contractures, adhesions, fibro fatty tissue filling acetabulum, avascular necrosis, arthritis and myositis ossificans. These types of injury often get missed at initial evaluation in the presence of distracting injuries and in poly trauma patients. Femoral head fractures account for only 7-16% of all hip fracture dislocations, with combined femoral head and acetabular fractures in elderly being even lower. Literature favours primary hip replacement as compared to hip salvage in age above 60 years and in patients with neglected hip fracture dislocations of more than 3 months duration due to high chances of afore mentioned complications. Here, we report a case of 69 years old male with neglected hip fracture dislocation associated with posterior acetabular wall and femoral head fracture for the challenges in management with a total hip replacement.</p>

scholarly journals Comparison of Early Clinical Results of Femoral Neck System and Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqiang Zhou ◽  
Zhiqiang Li ◽  
Renjie Xu ◽  
Yuanshi She ◽  
Xiangxin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Femoral Neck Fracture ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Neck Fracture

Abstract Objective: To compare the early clinical effects of femoral neck system and three cannulated screws in the treatment of patients with unstable femoral neck fractures.Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 81 patients who received FNS or cannulated screws internal fixation for Pauwels Type-3 femoral neck fracture in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2019. A pair-matched clinical research was performed. People who received FNS were test group and people received cannulated screws were control group. Matching requirements were as follows： the same gender, the similar age and the similar BMI. A total of 30 pairs were successfully matched, with an average age of 53.84 years old. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, postoperative VAS score, time walking without crutches, Harris score, femoral head necrosis rate and complication rate were compared between the two groups.Results: Postoperative re-examination of radiographs showed satisfactory reduction in all patients, and all the patients were followed up for 10-22 months. Patients in the FNS group had lower postoperative VAS scores, earlier time to walk without crutches, higher Harris scores at the last follow-up and lower complication rate (P<0.05). However, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization costs in the FNS group were more（P<0.05）. There was no statistically significant difference in operation time, hospital stay and femoral head necrosis rate between two group (P>0.05).Conclusion: For patients who were unstable femoral neck fracture, FNS has better clinical efficacy than cannulated screws, though FNS is more expensive. The excellent biomechanical performance and clinical efficacy of FNS make it a new choice for the treatment of unstable femoral neck fracture.Fund program: Key medical research project of Jiangsu Health Committee（K2019010）

scholarly journals Fractures of the acetabulum - surgical treatment and complications

2020 ◽  
pp. 110-110
Author(s):  
Sasa Milenkovic ◽  
Milan Mitkovic ◽  
Milorad Mitkovic ◽  
Predrag Stojiljkovic
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Acetabular Fracture ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Male Population ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Results Of Treatment ◽  
Car Accidents ◽  
Anatomic Reduction ◽  
Poor Outcomes

Acetabular fractures represent severe injuries that mostly occur in car accidents, or after falling from greater heights, most often in the working male population. Acetabular fractures are present in our clinical practice and require a good education and surgical training. Surgical experience is one of the prerequisites for achieving good treatment results, because these fractures are accompanied by numerous complications. In order to acquire knowledge and skills in this field of surgery, it is necessary to have a national center for education at one of the Medical Faculties in Serbia. All dislocated acetabular fractures (? 2mm), require early surgery, anatomical reduction and stable internal fixation of acetabular fracture. Acetabular fracture-dislocation requires urgent reduction of the dislocated femoral head. The anatomic reduction of the fracture is related to the time of definitive bone fixation of the fracture. After 14 days from the fracture, anatomic reduction is more difficult to achieve. In addition to these factors that positively affect the final results of treatment, there are negative factors as well, that result in poor outcomes. They are directly correlated to the initial trauma that occurs at the time of injury. Fracture comminution, large dislocation (> 20mm), injury of the femoral head, posterior dislocation of the hip, impaction, traumatic or iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy, are factors that negatively affect the results and are responsible for complications, as opposed to positive factors.

scholarly journals Comparison of early clinical results for the femoral neck system and cannulated screws in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoqiang Zhou ◽  
Zhiqiang Li ◽  
Renjie Xu ◽  
Yuanshi She ◽  
Xiangxin Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
Femoral Head Necrosis ◽  
Cannulated Screws ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss

Abstract Objective: To compare early clinical effects of the femoral neck system (FNS) and three cannulated screws for the treatment of patients with unstable femoral neck fractures. Methods: A retrospective analysis with pair matching of 81 patients who received FNS or cannulated screw internal fixation for Pauwels type-3 femoral neck fracture in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2019 was conducted. Patients who received FNS were the test group, and those who received cannulated screws comprised the control group. Matching requirements were as follows: same sex, similar age and similar body mass index (BMI). A total of 30 pairs were successfully matched, and the average age was 53.84 years. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization cost, postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, time to walking without crutches, Harris score, femoral head necrosis rate and complication rate were compared between the groups. Results: Postoperative re-examination of radiographs showed satisfactory reduction in all patients, and all patients were followed up for 10-22 months. Those in the FNS group had lower postoperative VAS scores, earlier times to walking without crutches, higher Harris scores at the last follow-up and lower complication rates (P<0.05). However, intraoperative blood loss and hospitalization costs were greater in the FNS group (P<0.05). No statistically significant difference in operation time, hospital stay or femoral head necrosis rate was observed between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: For patients with unstable femoral neck fractures, FNS has better clinical efficacy than cannulated screws, though it is also more expensive. The excellent biomechanical performance and clinical efficacy of FNS make it a new choice for the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures.

Intrapelvic Dislocation of the Femoral Head after Central Acetabular and Femoral Neck Fracture

1997 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 75-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ceballos Mesa ◽  
R. Balmaseda Manent ◽  
R. Puente Rodriguez ◽  
M. Pedroso Canto
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Rare Condition ◽  
Young Female ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Neck Fracture ◽  
Dislocation Of The Hip

Central fracture-dislocation of the hip associated with fracture of the femoral neck and intrapelvic intrusion of the femoral head is a very rare condition. The treatment of choice consists of open reduction of the dislocation and internal fixation of both fractures, but this is often not possible in delayed cases. In our patient, a young female, operated on six months after the trauma by partial resection of the femoral head and a cementless total hip arthroplasty, a good clinical result was achieved.

scholarly journals A case report of femoral head fracture with osteochondral lesion treated by osteosynthesis and biomimetic scaffold: 2-year clinical and radiological follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Casiraghi ◽  
Claudio Galante ◽  
Marco Domenicucci ◽  
Stefano Cattaneo ◽  
Andrea Achille Spreafico ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Femoral Head ◽  
Articular Surface ◽  
Osteochondral Lesion ◽  
Hip Dislocation ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Osteochondral Lesions ◽  
Femoral Head Fracture ◽  
Osteochondral Scaffold

AbstractThe aim of the present study was to present clinical and radiological outcome of a hip fracture-dislocation of the femoral head treated with biomimetic osteochondral scaffold.An 18-year-old male was admitted to the hospital after a motorcycle-accident. He presented with an obturator hip dislocation with a type IVA femoral head fracture according to Brumback classification system. The patient underwent surgery 5 days after accident. The largest osteochondral fragment was reduced and stabilized with 2 screws, and the small fragments were removed. The residual osteochondral area was replaced by a biomimetic nanostructured osteochondral scaffold. At 1-year follow-up the patient did not complain of hip pain and could walk without limp. At 2-year follow-up he was able to run with no pain and he returned to practice sports. Repeated radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging studies of the hip showed no signs of osteoarthritis or evidence of avascular necrosis. A hyaline-like signal on the surface of the scaffold was observed with restoration of the articular surface and progressive decrease of the subchondral edema.The results of the present study showed that the biomimetic nanostructured osteochondral scaffold could be a promising and safe option for the treatment of traumatic osteochondral lesions of the femoral head.Study Design: Case report.

The association between femoral neck shaft angle and degenerative disease of the hip in a cadaveric model

2021 ◽  
pp. 112070002110130
Author(s):  
Leigh-Anne Tu ◽  
Douglas S Weinberg ◽  
Raymond W Liu
Keyword(s):  
Femoral Head ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Hip Osteoarthritis ◽  
Volume Ratio ◽  
Femoral Head Coverage ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Hip Arthritis ◽  
Femoral Version ◽  
Shaft Angle ◽  
The Impact

Background: While the influences of acetabular dysplasia and overcoverage on hip arthritis have been studied, the impact of femoral neck-shaft angle on hip arthritis is much more poorly understood. The purpose of this study is to determine if a relationship exists between neck shaft angle and the development of osteoarthritis, a better understanding of which would be useful to surgeons planning osteotomies about the hip. Methods: 533 cadaveric femora and acetabulae (1066 total) from the Hamann-Todd Osteological Collection (Cleveland, OH) were acquired. We measured true neck shaft angle using an AP photograph with the femoral neck parallel to the table. Femoral head volume to acetabular volume ratio, representing femoral head coverage, as well as femoral version were utilised. Correlation between neck shaft angle, femoral version, femoral head coverage and osteoarthritis were evaluated with multiple regression analysis. Results: The mean age and standard deviation was 56 ± 10 years. There were 64 females (12%) and 469 males. There were 380 Caucasians (71%) and 153 African-Americans. Mean femoral version was 11° ± 12° and mean true neck shaft angle was 127.7° ± 5.9° There was a strong correlation between age and arthritis (standardised beta 0.488, p < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between increasing true neck shaft angle and decreasing hip arthritis (standardised beta -0.024, p = 0.038). In the femoral head overcoverage subset, increasing true neck shaft angle was still significantly associated with decreasing hip arthritis (standardised beta −0.088, p = 0.018), although this relationship was not significant with femoral head undercoverage subset. Conclusions: With sufficient acetabular coverage, a relative increase in femoral neck shaft angle within the physiologic range is associated with decreased hip osteoarthritis. Clinical relevance: An understanding of the relationship between femoral neck shaft angle and hip osteoarthritis could be useful for surgeons planning pelvic or proximal femur osteotomies in children.

scholarly journals Traditional versus mirror three-dimensional printing technology for isolated acetabular fractures: a retrospective study with a median follow-up of 25 months

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052110285
Author(s):  
Kai Xiao ◽  
Bo Xu ◽  
Lin Ding ◽  
Weiguang Yu ◽  
Lei Bao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
3D Printing ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Printing Technology ◽  
Three Dimensional Printing ◽  
3D Printing Technology ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective To assess the outcomes of traditional three-dimensional (3D) printing technology (TPT) versus mirror 3D printing technology (MTT) in treating isolated acetabular fractures (IAFs). Methods Consecutive patients with an IAF treated by either TPT or MTT at our tertiary medical centre from 2012 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Follow-up was performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter. The primary outcome was the Harris hip score (HHS), and the secondary outcomes were major intraoperative variables and key orthopaedic complications. Results One hundred fourteen eligible patients (114 hips) with an IAF (TPT, n = 56; MTT, n = 58) were evaluated. The median follow-up was 25 months (range, 21–28 months). At the last follow-up, the mean HHS was 82.46 ±14.70 for TPT and 86.30 ± 13.26 for MTT with a statistically significant difference. Significant differences were also detected in the major intraoperative variables (operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of fluoroscopic screenings, and anatomical reduction number) and the major orthopaedic complications (loosening, implant failure, and heterotopic ossification). Conclusion Compared with TPT, MTT tends to produce accurate IAF reduction and may result in better intraoperative variables and a lower rate of major orthopaedic complications.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document