femoral version
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

71
(FIVE YEARS 37)

H-INDEX

11
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (12) ◽  
pp. 1363
Author(s):  
Radomir Dimovski ◽  
Robert Teitge ◽  
Nicholas Bolz ◽  
Patrick Schafer ◽  
Vamsy Bobba ◽  
...  

Background and Objectives: Producing consistent measures of femoral version amongst observers are necessary to allow for an assessment of version for possible corrective procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare two computed tomography (CT)-based techniques for the reliability of measuring femoral version amongst observers. Materials and Methods: Review was performed for 15 patients post-femoral nailing for comminuted (Winquist III and IV) femoral shaft fractures where CT scanograms were obtained. Two CT-based techniques were utilized to measure femoral version by five observers. Results: The mean femoral version, when utilizing a proximal line drawn down the center of the femoral head-neck through CT, was 9.50 ± 4.82°, while the method utilizing the head and shaft at lesser trochanter centers produced a mean version of 18.73 ± 2.69°. A significant difference was noted between these two (p ≤ 0.001). The method of measuring in the center of the femoral head and neck produced an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.960 with a 95% confidence interval lower bound of 0.909 and upper bound of 0.982. For the method assessing version via the center of the head and shaft at the lesser trochanter region, the ICC was 0.993 with a 95% confidence interval lower bound of 0.987 and an upper bound of 0.996. Conclusions: The method of measuring version proximally through a CT image of the femoral head–neck versus overlaying the femoral head with the femoral shaft at the most prominent aspect of the lesser trochanter produces differing version measurements by roughly 10° while yielding an almost perfect interobserver reliability in the new technique. Both techniques result in significantly high interobserver reliability.


Injury ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick J. Kellam ◽  
Miranda J. Rogers ◽  
Luke Myhre ◽  
Graham J. Dekeyser ◽  
Travis G. Maak ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (9) ◽  
pp. 757-764
Author(s):  
Jeroen Verhaegen ◽  
Saif Salih ◽  
Shankar Thiagarajah ◽  
George Grammatopoulos ◽  
Johan D. Witt

Aims Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an established treatment for acetabular dysplasia. It has also been proposed as a treatment for patients with acetabular retroversion. By reviewing a large cohort, we aimed to test whether outcome is equivalent for both types of morphology and identify factors that influenced outcome. Methods A single-centre, retrospective cohort study was performed on patients with acetabular retroversion treated with PAO (n = 62 hips). Acetabular retroversion was diagnosed clinically and radiologically (presence of a crossover sign, posterior wall sign, lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) between 20° and 35°). Outcomes were compared with a control group of patients undergoing PAO for dysplasia (LCEA < 20°; n = 86 hips). Femoral version was recorded. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), complications, and reoperation rates were measured. Results The mean Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) preoperatively was 58.6 (SD 16.1) for the dysplastic hips and 52.5 (SD 12.7) for the retroverted hips (p = 0.145). Postoperatively, mean NAHS was 83.0 (SD 16.9) and 76.7 (SD 17.9) for dysplastic and retroverted hips respectively (p = 0.041). Difference between pre- and postoperative NAHS was slightly lower in the retroverted hips (18.3 (SD 22.1)) compared to the dysplastic hips (25.2 (SD 15.2); p = 0.230). At mean 3.5 years’ follow-up (SD 1.9), one hip needed a revision PAO and no hips were converted to total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the retroversion group. In the control group, six hips (7.0%) were revised to THA. No differences in complications (p = 0.106) or in reoperation rate (p = 0.087) were seen. Negative predictors of outcome for patients undergoing surgery for retroversion were female sex, obesity, hypermobility, and severely decreased femoral anteversion. Conclusion A PAO is an effective surgical intervention for acetabular retroversion and produces similar improvements when used to treat dysplasia. Femoral version should be routinely assessed in these patients and when extremely low (< 0°), as an additional procedure to address this abnormality may be necessary. Females with signs of hypermobility should also be consulted of the likely guarded improvement. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2(9):757–764.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Z Arshad ◽  
H D Maughan ◽  
M H Pettit ◽  
K H S Kumar ◽  
A Arora ◽  
...  

Abstract Aim This systematic review aims to understand the relationship between version abnormalities of the femur and acetabulum in patients with primary and secondary femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Method A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A computer-based search was performed using the EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases for articles relating to version and torsional abnormalities in FAI, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease (LCPD) and slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The study was registered in the Open Science Framework. Two authors independently performed title/abstract and full text screening according to predetermined inclusion criteria. Results A total of 1206 articles were identified 55 articles, involving 10, 091 hips, met the inclusion criteria. All studies evaluating femoral/acetabular version in FAI reported ‘normal’ mean version values (10o to 25o). However, distribution analysis revealed that an estimated 31.4% and 51.3% of patients with FAI displayed abnormal acetabular and femoral version, respectively. Abnormal femoral version was reported in an estimated 74.5% of hips with LCPD, and abnormal acetabular version in an estimated 20%. Acetabular version was significantly lower in hips with SCFE compared to controls (Z=-3.26, P &lt; 0.01). Conclusions Patients presenting with hip pain attributed to FAI are likely to display an abnormality in femoral or acetabular version. This highlights the importance of evaluating these parameters during assessment of these patients, in order to guide clinical decision making.


Author(s):  
Eduardo N. Novais ◽  
Kianna D. Nunally ◽  
Mariana G. Ferrer ◽  
Patricia E. Miller ◽  
James D. Wylie ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine and stratify femoral version in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease (LCPD), and to compare the femoral version between the LCPD hip and the contralateral unaffected hip. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 45 patients with unilateral LCPD who had available CT scan through the hips and knees between January 2000 and June 2017. There were 34 (76%) male cases with a mean age of 14 years (sd 4.69). Two independent readers measured femoral version on the affected and the unaffected contralateral femur. Femoral version was classified as follows: severely decreased version (< 10°); moderately decreased (10° to 14°); normal femoral version range (15° to 20°); moderately increased (21° to 25°); and severely increased version (> 25°). Results LCPD hips had predominantly increased femoral version (38% severely increased anteversion, 24% moderately increased anteversion), while 51% of the contralateral unaffected hips had normal femoral version (p < 0.001). LCPD hips had higher mean femoral version than the contralateral, unaffected side (mean difference = 13o; 95% confidence iterval 10o to 16o; p < 0.001). As the version of the affected hip increased, so did the discrepancy between sides. No effect of sex on the LCPD femoral version was detected (p = 0.34). Conclusion This study included a selected group of patients with unilateral LCPD and available CT scans obtained for surgical planning. The femoral version was asymmetric, with a high proportion of excessive anteversion observed at later stages of disease in the affected hips. Future studies will be necessary to determine the pathogenesis of increased femoral version associated with LCPD. Level of Evidence Level IV, retrospective study.


Author(s):  
Andrew L. Schaver ◽  
Abioye Oshodi ◽  
Natalie A. Glass ◽  
Kyle R. Duchman ◽  
Michael C. Willey ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zaki Arshad ◽  
Henry David Maughan ◽  
Karadi Hari Sunil Kumar ◽  
Matthew Pettit ◽  
Arvind Arora ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The aim of this study was investigate the relationship between version and torsional abnormalities of the acetabulum, femur and tibia in patients with symptomatic FAI. Methods A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines using the EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane databases. Original research articles evaluating the described version and torsional parameters in FAI were included. The MINORS criteria were used to appraise study quality and risk of bias. Mean version and torsion values were displayed using forest plots and the estimated proportion of hips displaying abnormalities in version/torsion were calculated. Results A total of 1206 articles were identified from the initial search, with 43 articles, involving 8861 hips, meeting the inclusion criteria. All studies evaluating femoral or acetabular version in FAI reported ‘normal’ mean version values (10–25 °). However, distribution analysis revealed that an estimated 31% and 51% of patients with FAI displayed abnormal central acetabular and femoral version, respectively. Conclusion Up to 51% of patients presenting with symptomatic FAI show an abnormal femoral version, whilst up to 31% demonstrate abnormal acetabular version. This high percentage of version abnormalities highlights the importance of evaluating these parameters routinely during assessment of patients with FAI, to guide clinical decision-making. Level of evidence IV.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0016
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Graesser ◽  
Maria Schwabe ◽  
Cecilia Pascual Garrido ◽  
John C. Clohisy ◽  
Jeffrey J. Nepple

Introduction: Borderline acetabular dysplasia is classically defined as a lateral center edge angle (LCEA) of 20-25 degrees. The optimal treatment strategy in this patient group remains controversial, with some patients having primarily hip instability-based symptoms, while others have primarily impingement-based symptoms (non-instability). The purpose of the current study was to define the 3D characteristics on low-dose CT that differentiate patients with instability symptoms from those without instability in the setting of borderline acetabular dysplasia. Methods: Seventy consecutive hips with borderline acetabular dysplasia undergoing surgical treatment were included in the current study. All patients underwent low-dose pelvic CT with femoral version assessment for preoperative planning. CT measurements included alpha angle and radial acetabular coverage (RAC) at standardized clockface positions (9:00-posterior to 3:00-anterior), central and cranial acetabular version. RAC was assessed in three sectors (anterior, superior, and posterior) and defined (relative to published normative data) as normal (-1 SD, +1 SD), undercoverage (<-1 SD), or overcoverage (>+1 SD). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the CT characteristics of the symptomatic instability and non-instability groups. Results: Of the 70 hips, 62.9% had the diagnosis of symptomatic instability, while 37.1% had no instability symptoms. Hips with instability (compared to non-instability) had significantly lower alpha angle (maximal difference at 1:00 - 47.0° vs. 59.4°), increased femoral version (22.3° vs. 15.3°), and decreased radial acetabular coverage (maximal difference at 1:00 – 59.9% vs. 62.2%) (all p<0.001). Multivariate analysis identified femoral version (OR 1.1, p=0.02), alpha angle at 1:00 (OR 0.91, p=0.02), and RAC at 1:00 (OR 0.46, p=0.003) as independent predictors of the presence of instability. The model combining these three factors had excellent predictive probability with a c-statistic 0.92. Conclusion: We found significant differences in the 3D hip morphology of the symptomatic instability and non-instability subgroups within the borderline dysplasia cohort. In the setting of borderline dysplasia, three-dimensional deformity characterization with low-dose CT allowed for differentiation of patients diagnosed with underlying instability vs. non-instability. Femoral version, alpha angle at 1:00, and radial acetabular coverage at 1:00 were identified as independent predictors of diagnosis in borderline acetabular dysplasia. Summary: This study attempts to define 3D CT characteristics to help distinguish between patients with impingement-based vs instability-based symptoms of borderline acetabular dysplasia.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7_suppl3) ◽  
pp. 2325967121S0013
Author(s):  
Lucas M. Fowler ◽  
John C. Clohisy ◽  
Wahid Abu-Amer ◽  
Cecilia Pascual Garrido ◽  
Jeffrey J. Nepple

Background: Bony morphologies contributing to femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) are relatively common in the general population, but drivers of symptom development are not well understood. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the role of three-dimensional bony morphology in symptom development in the contralateral hip in patients undergoing ipsilateral surgical treatment for FAI. Methods: The study included a prospective cohort of 161 consecutive patients (101 females, 60 males) who presented for ipsilateral FAI surgical treatment from 2013-2018. The average age was 29.1 years. Minimum follow-up was 1 year (mean, 2.3 years; range, 1-6 years). Low-dose CT scans were obtained prior to surgical treatment. Three-dimensional hip analysis of the contralateral hip was performed relative to normative data and allowed measurements of 15 key parameters. Prior to surgery and at routine follow-up, patients completed standardized questionnaires that included pain in the contralateral hip. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent predictors. Results: There were 133 patients (83%) with follow-up. Significant levels of pain in the contralateral hip were reported in 25 (18.8%) patients at presentation and 50 (35.3%) patients at follow-up. Twenty-six (19.5%) patients progressed to surgery at an average of 1.12 years. Significant predictors of symptom development were alpha angle >55° at 1:00 (p=0.037), femoral version <0° or > 20° (p=0.027), and decreased central acetabular version at 3:00 (p=0.048). Significant predictors of surgery were age <30 years (p=0.023) and alpha angle >55° at 1:00 (p=0.005). Conclusion: We found that roughly 1 in 5 patients undergoing surgical treatment for ipsilateral FAI experienced pain in the contralateral hip at presentation, over one third reported pain at follow-up, and 1 in 5 progressed to surgery. Higher alpha angle, abnormal femoral version, and decreased acetabular version were correlated with symptom development, while higher alpha angle and age under 30 were associated with progression to surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 232596712110091
Author(s):  
Chenghui Wang ◽  
Yaying Sun ◽  
Zheci Ding ◽  
Jinrong Lin ◽  
Zhiwen Luo ◽  
...  

Background: It remains controversial whether abnormal femoral version (FV) affects the outcomes of hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) or labral tears. Purpose: To review the outcomes of hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI or labral tears in patients with normal versus abnormal FV. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched in July 2020 for studies reporting the outcomes after primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI or labral tears in patients with femoral retroversion (<5°), femoral anteversion (>20°), or normal FV (5°-20°). The primary outcome was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and secondary outcomes were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, Hip Outcome Score–Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), failure rate, and patient satisfaction. The difference in preoperative and postoperative scores (Δ) was also calculated when applicable. Results: Included in this review were 5 studies with 822 patients who underwent hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI or labral tears; there were 166 patients with retroversion, 512 patients with normal version, and 144 patients with anteversion. Patients with retroversion and normal version had similar postoperative mHHS scores (mean difference [MD], 2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), –3.42 to 8.26]; P = .42) and ΔmHHS scores (MD, –0.70 [96% CI, –8.56 to 7.15]; P = .86). Likewise, the patients with anteversion and normal version had similar postoperative mHHS scores (MD, –3.09 [95% CI, –7.66 to 1.48]; P = .18) and ΔmHHS scores (MD, –1.92 [95% CI, –6.18 to 2.34]; P = .38). Regarding secondary outcomes, patients with retroversion and anteversion had similar ΔNAHS scores, ΔHOS-SSS scores, ΔVAS scores, patient satisfaction, and failure rates to those with normal version, although a significant difference was found between the patients with retroversion and normal version regarding postoperative NAHS scores (MD, 5.96 [95% CI, 1.66-10.26]; P = .007) and postoperative HOS-SSS scores (MD, 7.32 [95% CI, 0.19-14.44]; P = .04). Conclusion: The results of this review indicated that abnormal FV did not significantly influence outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for FAI or labral tears.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document