scholarly journals Correction to: Position statement: minimum archiving requirements for emergency medicine point‑of‑care ultrasound—a modified Delphi‑derived national consensus

CJEM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael K. Y. Wong ◽  
◽  
Paul Olszynski ◽  
Warren J. Cheung ◽  
Paul Pageau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
National Consensus

scholarly journals MP003: AP or IP? Introduction of a new assessment of performance tool for point of care ultrasound

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S67-S67
Author(s):  
P.R. Atkinson ◽  
D. Lewis ◽  
J. Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Position Statement ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Entire Body ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Assessment Of Performance ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Assessment Of Practice

Introduction: Organizations including CAEP, CEUS, the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) and the Canadian Association of Radiologists have all called for defined competency assessments for point of care ultrasound (PoCUS). Definitions of core indications vary. The requirement for ongoing assessment of performance and skills maintenance is often overlooked. We describe the introduction an IFEM approved Assessment of Practice (AP) tool across a PoCUS training program and for continued assessment. Methods: We completed a cross sectional survey and cohort study including the entire body of emergency medicine physicians at a tertiary hospital. Over a 3 year period, all practitioners were assessed for CAEP position statement defined core applications at baseline and again after 2 years using a published PoCUS AP tool. We describe the tool, its application and the performance assessment findings. Emergency physicians (EP) underwent AP following formal training including an approved course and a logbook documenting a variable number of scans. Results: 23 EPs completed training and underwent AP initially, with all 23 EPs completing further assessment within 3 years. Assessment of practice was completed for 1. Focused Diagnostic Ultrasound Assessment for AAA, eFAST, cardiac, early pregnancy; and 2. Focused Procedural Ultrasound Guidance for venous catheterization. All EPs demonstrated initial and continuing competency in these PoCUS modalities. Conclusion: The IFEM PoCUS curriculum promotes ongoing local assessment of performance. We successfully implemented this competency based approach and demonstrated feasibility, flexibility and utility in a Canadian emergency medicine program.

scholarly journals Development of Core Contents of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Curriculum for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physician Training: A Modified Delphi Survey

Children ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. 757
Author(s):  
Jae-Hyun Kwon ◽  
Jin-Hee Lee ◽  
Young-Rock Ha ◽  
June-Dong Park ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Medicine ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Experience Teaching ◽  
Emergency Medicine Physician ◽  
Medicine Physician ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasonography

Background: As the frequency of ultrasound use in pediatric emergency departments increases, it is necessary to train pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians on pediatric point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS). We discussed the core content of POCUS applications and proposed a POCUS training curriculum for PEM physicians in South Korea. Methods: Twenty-three experts were included if had performed over 1500 POCUS scans, had at least three years of experience teaching POCUS to physicians, were POCUS instructors or had completed a certified pediatric POCUS program. Experts rated 61 possible POCUS applications in terms of the importance of their inclusion in a PEM POCUS curriculum using the modified Delphi technique. Results: In round one, twelve (52.2%) out of 23 experts responded to the email. Eleven experts satisfied the inclusion criteria. Eleven experts participated in round one of a survey and agreed on 27 (44.3%) out of a total of 61 items. In round two, all 11 experts participated in the survey; they agreed on two (5.9%) of the remaining 34 items, and no items were excluded. Conclusion: Using the Delphi method, 61 applications were discussed, and a consensus was reached on 29 core applications.

scholarly journals International Federation for Emergency Medicine Consensus Statement: Sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest (SHoC): An international consensus on the use of point of care ultrasound for undifferentiated hypotension and during cardiac arrest

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 459-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Atkinson ◽  
Justin Bowra ◽  
James Milne ◽  
David Lewis ◽  
Mike Lambert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Consensus Statement ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
International Federation ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Modified Delphi

Abstract Introduction The International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) Ultrasound Special Interest Group (USIG) was tasked with development of a hierarchical consensus approach to the use of point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) in patients with hypotension and cardiac arrest. Methods The IFEM USIG invited 24 recognized international leaders in PoCUS from emergency medicine and critical care to form an expert panel to develop the sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest (SHoC) protocol. The panel was provided with reported disease incidence, along with a list of recommended PoCUS views from previously published protocols and guidelines. Using a modified Delphi methodology the panel was tasked with integrating the disease incidence, their clinical experience and their knowledge of the medical literature to evaluate what role each view should play in the proposed SHoC protocol. Results Consensus on the SHoC protocols for hypotension and cardiac arrest was reached after three rounds of the modified Delphi process. The final SHoC protocol and operator checklist received over 80% consensus approval. The IFEM-approved final protocol, recommend Core, Supplementary, and Additional PoCUS views. SHoC-hypotension core views consist of cardiac, lung, and inferior vena vaca (IVC) views, with supplementary cardiac views, and additional views when clinically indicated. Subxiphoid or parasternal cardiac views, minimizing pauses in chest compressions, are recommended as core views for SHoC-cardiac arrest; supplementary views are lung and IVC, with additional views when clinically indicated. Both protocols recommend use of the “4 F” approach: fluid, form, function, filling. Conclusion An international consensus on sonography in hypotension and cardiac arrest is presented. Future prospective validation is required.

scholarly journals LO045: Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest (SHoC) - Cardiac Arrest: A consensus on the integration of point of care ultrasound into advanced cardiac life support during cardiac arrest

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S45-S46
Author(s):  
P. Atkinson ◽  
J. Bowra ◽  
J. Milne ◽  
M. Lambert ◽  
B. Jarman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Cardiac Activity ◽  
Advanced Cardiac Life Support ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Modified Delphi

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound (PoCUS) provides invaluable information during resuscitation efforts in cardiac arrest by determining presence/absence of cardiac activity and identifying reversible causes such as pericardial tamponade. There is no agreed guideline on how to safely and effectively incorporate PoCUS into the advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) algorithm. We consider that a consensus-based priority checklist using a “4 F’s” approach (Fluid; Form; Function; Filling), would provide a better algorithm during ACLS. Methods: The ultrasound subcommittee of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) drafted a checklist incorporating PoCUS into the ACLS algorithm. This was further developed using the input of 24 international experts associated with five professional organizations led by the International Federation of Emergency Medicine. A modified Delphi tool was developed to reach an international consensus on how to integrate ultrasound into cardiac arrest algorithms for emergency department patients. Results: Consensus was reached following 3 rounds. The agreed protocol focuses on the timing of PoCUS as well as the specific clinical questions. Core cardiac windows performed during the rhythm check pause in chest compressions are the sub-xiphoid and parasternal cardiac views. Either view should be used to detect pericardial fluid, as well as examining ventricular form (e.g. right heart strain) and function, (e.g. asystole versus organized cardiac activity). Supplementary views include lung views (for absent lung sliding in pneumothorax and for pleural fluid), and IVC views for filling. Additional ultrasound applications are for endotracheal tube confirmation, proximal leg veins for DVT, or for sources of blood loss (AAA, peritoneal/pelvic fluid). Conclusion: The authors hope that this process will lead to a consensus-based SHoC-cardiac arrest guideline on incorporating PoCUS into the ACLS algorithm.

scholarly journals P114: Critical objectives for a pediatric emergency medicine fellowship point of care ultrasound curriculum

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S116-S117
Author(s):  
A.E. Shefrin ◽  
F. Warkentine ◽  
E. Constantine ◽  
A. Toney ◽  
A. Uya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Medicine ◽  
Delphi Consensus ◽  
Multinational Group ◽  
Screening Process ◽  
Modified Delphi

Introduction: Emergency Medicine Physicians have been incorporating Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) into their practice for over twenty years. Only recently has its use become more widespread in the practice of Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM). Recent guidelines have described the scope of applications for PEM physicians. However, no consensus exists as to which applications should be prioritized and routinely taught to PEM fellowship trainees and therefore expected of PEM graduates as they enter practice. The PEM POCUS Network, a multinational group of Physicians with POCUS expertise formed in 2014, set out to reach expert consensus as to which applications should be incorporated into PEM fellowship training curricula. Methods: A multinational group of PEM POCUS experts was recruited from the PEM POCUS Network via a screening process that identified PEM physicians who have performed over 1000 pediatric POCUS scans and met any of one of the following criteria: having 3 years or more experience teaching POCUS to PEM fellows, being local academic POCUS leaders or had completed a dedicated PEM POCUS fellowship. These experts rated each of the 60 possible PEM POCUS applications using a modified Delphi consensus building technique for their importance in inclusion into a PEM Fellowship curriculum. Consensus was reached when >80% of respondents agreed to include or exclude each item. Results: In the first round, 66 out of 92 (72%) PEM POCUS Network members responded to the survey email, of whom 45 met expert criteria and completed the first round. During round 1, consensus was reached to include 18 of the 60 applications in a PEM fellowship curriculum and to exclude 2 applications from a PEM fellowship curriculum. Eighty-two percent (37 /45) of the experts completed Round 2 where 40 items were rated; consensus was reached to include 3 additional applications and exclude 5 applications. The decision was made not to carry on with future rounds after this stage, since no significant changes were observed between the two rounds, with regard to items that had not reached consensus. Conclusion: This project of the PEM POCUS Network reached consensus on 21 applications that should be included in a PEM Fellowship curriculum. This project will have significant impact on how PEM fellowships teach POCUS to their trainees.

scholarly journals Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound for COVID-19 (PoCUS4COVID): international expert consensus

Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Hussain ◽  
Gabriele Via ◽  
Lawrence Melniker ◽  
Alberto Goffi ◽  
Guido Tavazzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Expert Consensus ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
The Past ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Grade Methodology

AbstractCOVID-19 has caused great devastation in the past year. Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) including lung ultrasound (LUS) and focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) as a clinical adjunct has played a significant role in triaging, diagnosis and medical management of COVID-19 patients. The expert panel from 27 countries and 6 continents with considerable experience of direct application of PoCUS on COVID-19 patients presents evidence-based consensus using GRADE methodology for the quality of evidence and an expedited, modified-Delphi process for the strength of expert consensus. The use of ultrasound is suggested in many clinical situations related to respiratory, cardiovascular and thromboembolic aspects of COVID-19, comparing well with other imaging modalities. The limitations due to insufficient data are highlighted as opportunities for future research.

scholarly journals LO042: Sonography in Hypotension and Cardiac Arrest (SHoC) - Hypotension: derivation of an evidence-based consensus algorithm for the integration of point of care ultrasound into resuscitation of hypotensive patients

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S44-S44 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Atkinson ◽  
J. Bowra ◽  
J. Milne ◽  
M. Lambert ◽  
B. Jarman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Point Of Care ◽  
Disease Incidence ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Consensus Algorithm ◽  
Professional Organizations ◽  
Clinical Indication ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Modified Delphi ◽  
Delphi Approach

Introduction: Point of care ultrasound has become an established tool in the initial management of patients with undifferentiated hypotension. Current established protocols (RUSH, ACES, etc) were developed by expert user opinion, rather than objective, prospective data. We wished to use reported disease incidence to develop an informed approach to PoCUS in hypotension using a “4 F’s” approach: Fluid; Form; Function; Filling. Methods: We summarized the incidence of PoCUS findings from an international multicentre RCT, and using a modified Delphi approach incorporating this data we obtained the input of 24 international experts associated with five professional organizations led by the International Federation of Emergency Medicine. The modified Delphi tool was developed to reach an international consensus on how to integrate PoCUS for hypotensive emergency department patients. Results: Rates of abnormal PoCUS findings from 151 patients with undifferentiated hypotension included left ventricular dynamic changes (43%), IVC abnormalities (27%), pericardial effusion (16%), and pleural fluid (8%). Abdominal pathology was rare (fluid 5%, AAA 2%). After two rounds of the survey, using majority consensus, agreement was reached on a SHoC-hypotension protocol comprising: A. Core: 1. Cardiac views (Sub-xiphoid and parasternal windows for pericardial fluid, cardiac form and ventricular function); 2. Lung views for pleural fluid and B-lines for filling status; and 3. IVC views for filling status; B. Supplementary: Additional cardiac views; and C. Additional views (when indicated) including peritoneal fluid, aorta, pelvic for IUP, and proximal leg veins for DVT. Conclusion: An international consensus process based on prospectively collected disease incidence has led to a proposed SHoC-hypotension PoCUS protocol comprising a stepwise clinical-indication based approach of Core, Supplementary and Additional PoCUS views.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document