Quantitative analysis of factors influencing neuronal necrosis induced by MK-801 in the rat posterior cingulate/retrosplenial cortex

1995 ◽  
Vol 696 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 194-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew S. Fix ◽  
David F. Wozniak ◽  
Lewis L. Truex ◽  
Melanie McEwen ◽  
J. Phillip Miller ◽  
...  
2001 ◽  
Vol 913 (2) ◽  
pp. 185-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna Jevtovic-Todorovic ◽  
David F Wozniak ◽  
Sarah Powell ◽  
John W Olney

1991 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 801-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank R. Sharp ◽  
Pat Jasper ◽  
John Hall ◽  
Linda Noble ◽  
Stephen M. Sagar

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna Jevtović-Todorović ◽  
Charity O. Kirby ◽  
John W. Olney

In acute brain injury syndromes, the potent N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist, MK-801, can prevent neuronal degeneration, and the general anesthetics, isoflurane and propofol, may also provide neuroprotective benefits. An obstacle to the use of NMDA antagonists for neuroprotective purposes is that they can cause a neurotoxic vacuole reaction in cerebrocortical neurons. This study demonstrates the ability of isoflurane and propofol to prevent the neurotoxic vacuole reaction induced by MK-801. Low sedative doses of inhaled isoflurane (1%) or intravenous (i.v.) propofol (7.5 mg/kg/h) were as effective as higher general anesthetic doses. Thus, in the clinical management of acute brain injury conditions such as stroke and brain trauma, administration of one of these anesthetic agents together with an NMDA antagonist may be an excellent formula for obtaining optimal neuroprotection while eliminating serious side effects.


2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Motohiro Shiotani ◽  
Kyoko Nakano ◽  
Emiko Yamauchi ◽  
Yoshiya Oda ◽  
Satoru Hosokawa ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 512-537
Author(s):  
Mohammad Amouzadeh ◽  
Raha Zareifard

Abstract The present study sets out to investigate an important aspect of gendered performance, namely, the presence of interactional metadiscourse in conference presentations delivered in Persian. The study pursues two primary objectives: firstly, to compare the quantity and quality of interactional metadiscourse markers as expressed by male and female academics; secondly, to investigate some other factors influencing the phenomenon under investigation. The data include twenty-four conference presentations by twelve males and twelve females. The quantitative analysis showed a statistically significant difference in the use of interactional metadiscourse by male and female presenters. However, the qualitative analysis helped the authors to identify more similarities than differences. In point of fact, such factors as academic status and nativeness had caused the speakers to use different metadiscourse strategies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document