Single stage laparoscopic treatment of gallstones and common bile duct (CBD) stones in 110 unselected, consecutive patients

1995 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. A430 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Laparoscopic Treatment ◽  
Cbd Stones

scholarly journals Two-stages using endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography procedures versus single stage laparoscopic management for concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 4244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed Abdel Kahaar Aldardeer ◽  
Alaa A. Redwaan
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Background: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LECBD) has been proven to be a safe, reliable, and effective treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones and has gained wider acceptance. Endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and efficient method that has been usually used for the treatment of bile duct stones. The aim of this study is to compare the outcome of management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct by two stage (ERCP+LC) versus one stage (LECBD+LC).Methods: This study included 150 patients with concomitant gallstones and CBD stones who were treated at sohag university hospital from July 2017 to December 2018. Results were statistically analysed.Results: The success rates of laparoscopic CBD exploration and ERCP for clearance of CBD were similar (Group A 96% vs. Group B 97.3%). The mean operative time was significantly longer in-group A (125.7±36.6 min) vs. in-group B (82.4±27.6 min), Group A as regard intraoperative complications (one patient had hemorrhage) vs. group B (2 patients hemorrhage during lap. cholecystectomy). As for conversion to other procedure 2 patients for group A vs. 3 patients for group B (conversion of LC to open).Conclusions: Single and two-stage management for uncomplicated concomitant gallbladder and CBD stones had similar success and complication rates, but the single stage strategy was better in terms of shorter hospital stay, need for fewer procedures, less morbidity, and allows earlier recovery with a reduced period of short-term disability. 

scholarly journals LAPAROSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF COMMON BILE DUCT STONES

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Binit Prasad ◽  
Mukesh Kumar ◽  
Debarshi Jana
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Open Surgery ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Cbd Stone ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Introduction: Common Bile Duct stones (CBD) are found in approximately 16% of the patients undergoing Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Till recently, the gold standard for treating CBD stones was endoscopic removal, if that failed, then open surgery. However, in the laparoscopic era, the best treatment for CBD stones is a matter of debate and it continues to evolve. The objective of the present study is to determine that laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is a safe, feasible and single-stage option for the management of CBD stones. Materials and Methods :Out of the 2900 laparoscopic cholecystectomies we did selective intraoperative cholangiogram in 262 patients who were suspected to have CBD stones based on deranged liver function tests, dilated CBD with or without CBD stone on sonography or having the history of recent jaundice/pancreatitis. If CBD stone was found, either a transcystic or transcholedochal exploration was done depending on the size, site, number of stones and CBD diameter. Choledochotomy was closed over a t-tube in the majority of the patients. Primary closure of CBD was done in few patients and in one patient we placed an antegrade stent and in another we placed endoscopic stent into the CBD laparoscpically which was removed after four weeks. Results :Till date we have performed LCBDE in 64 patients. Transcystic exploration was done in 14 patients and transcholedochal exploration was done in 46 cases out of which 2 patients had minor biliary leak which settled on conservative treatment in 2-3 days. Four patients required conversion to open surgery as there were multiple stones. We did not have any major complication and on 6 months follow-up in 76% patients, none was found to have residual stone. Conclusion :The treatment of CBD stones depends on the resources available, technical limitations and the surgeon’s expertise. Laparoscopic CBD exploration is a safe, feasible and single-stage option for the management of CBD stones.

scholarly journals Surgical procedure for unexpected balloon burst complication during endoscopic balloon dilatation in a patient with common bile duct stones

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Morishita ◽  
Hideaki Sasaki
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Rare Complication ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Retrograde ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Endoscopic Balloon Dilatation ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Endoscopic Balloon

Abstract Background Endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) is the established treatment for common bile duct (CBD) stones. Although pancreatitis and bleeding have been reported as major complications of EBD, balloon-related complications are rarely reported in EBD. Case presentation A 30-year-old woman with suspected CBD stones underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and EBD. During EBD, the balloon of the EBD catheter suddenly burst at the biliary sphincter. We therefore performed surgical intervention: removal of the broken EBD catheter and T-tube drainage. Finally, the patient was discharged without any complications. Conclusions We present a case involving a burst balloon of an EBD catheter as a rare complication during EBD, as well as the surgical technique that was used to treat this complication.

scholarly journals Abordaje laparoscópico sistemático de la coledocolitiasis

2021 ◽  
Vol 113 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-72
Author(s):  
Carlos M. Canullán ◽  
◽  
Enrique J. Petracchi ◽  
Nicolás Baglietto ◽  
Hugo I. Zandalazini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Preoperative Diagnosis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Single Stage ◽  
Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Bile Duct Injuries ◽  
Transcystic Approach

Background: The prevalence of common bile duct stones associated with cholelithiasis increases with age and is about 15 % in the 8th decade of life but its management is still controversial. Some surgeons prefer the single-stage approach with laparoscopy while others suggest the two-stage management with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of feasibility of single-stage laparoscopic surgery in patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective study with prospectively collected data between July 2008 and July 2018. Results: Of 2447 laparoscopic cholecystectomies performed during the study period, 416 presented common bile duct stones. The global success of the transcystic approach to clear common bile duct stones was 81.2%, 70.4% in the cases with preoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and 92.9% for other diagnoses. The rate of complications was 4% without deaths or bile duct injuries. Conclusion: Single-stage laparoscopic surgery is an efficient and safe approach based on the high global success of transcystic exploration. The preoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis reduces the efficacy of the procedure due to greater indication of choledocotomy, with complications and longer length of hospital stay.

scholarly journals STUDY ON THE LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF COMMON BILE DUCT STONE

1997 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
pp. 2512-2515
Author(s):  
Hiroshi HASEGAWA ◽  
Seiji OGISO ◽  
Hideki NISHIO ◽  
Tohru MURATA ◽  
Tomotaka KAMEI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stone ◽  
Bile Duct Stone ◽  
Laparoscopic Treatment

scholarly journals Laparoscopic CBD Exploration (LCBDE) a better and safe option for large CBD stones

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1321-1323
Author(s):  
I. Sadiq ◽  
A. Malik ◽  
J. K. Lodhi ◽  
S. T. Bukhari ◽  
R. Maqbool ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Bile Leak ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Common Bile Duct Exploration ◽  
Open Approach ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Laparoscopic Cbd Exploration ◽  
Cbd Exploration

Background: Conventionally, common bile duct stones (CBDS) are removed with help of ERCP. However, if CBDS are larger than 10 mm, then the ERCP failure rate to retrieve CBDS becomes high. In that case, open or laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is other alternative. In this era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) seems to be a better option than open approach, but in our set up the safety of LCBDE is questioned. Aim: To see the conversion rate as well as complications associated with LCBDE. Material & Methods: Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of data of patients who underwent Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE) for large CBD stones at Fatima Memorial Hospital Lahore. Results: Since 2012, 29 patients of large (≥10 mm) CBD stones were included in this study. Among them 20(69.9%) were females and 9(31.01%) were males. The mean CBD stone size was 13 mm. Stones were extracted transcystically in 4 case and Transcholedochal stone extraction was done in 25 cases. The average duration of surgery was 130 minutes, but all cases were completed successfully without converting to open approach. There was minor bile leak in 3 patients which was managed successfully without any further intervention. No other complication was observed with LCBDE and even no retained stone was reported. Conclusion: Laparoscopic CBD exploration is safe and effective method of dealing CBD stones especially of large size when the chances of ERCP failure to retrieve stones are high. Keywords: Laparoscopy, ERCP, common bile duct,

scholarly journals Accuracy of Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography Findings in the Diagnosis of Biliary System Stones

2022 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 841-852
Author(s):  
Abdullah Taher Naji ◽  
Ameen Mohsen Amer ◽  
Saddam Mohammed Alzofi ◽  
Esmail Abdu Ali ◽  
Noman Qaid Alnaggar
Keyword(s):  
Bile Duct ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Common Bile Duct ◽  
Common Bile Duct Stones ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Biliary System ◽  
Cbd Stones ◽  
System Diagnosis ◽  
Us Findings

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and Ultrasound (US) images for the diagnosis of biliary system stones, as well as to assess the consistency between MRCP and US findings. The study sample included 200 cases (90 males and 110 females) with symptomatic biliary system stones between 14 and 82 years. All cases underwent both the US and MRCP imaging for biliary system diagnosis. The study revealed that the most prominent age group with symptoms of biliary system stones was the 33-60-year-old group. It also found that the accuracy of US and MRCP in detecting gallbladder (GB) stones compared with the final diagnosis was 94% and 91%, respectively, with moderate conformity between their results. The accuracy of US and MRCP images in detecting common bile duct (CBD) stones was 61% and 98%, respectively, with fair conformity between their results. In addition, there is a significant agreement between the MRCP and US results in detecting the GB and CBD stones with an agreed percentage of 74% and 71%, respectively. The study concluded that US is the preferred imaging technique for patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones, whereas MRCP is a trustworthy investigation for common bile duct stones.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document