Compliance of long-term lipid-lowering therapy in familial hypercholesterolemia, influence on life quality and progression of coronary heart disease

1994 ◽  
Vol 109 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 325
Author(s):  
K. Retterstøl ◽  
M. Stugaard ◽  
L. Ose
2015 ◽  
Vol 66 (17) ◽  
pp. 1864-1872 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Bittner ◽  
Luqin Deng ◽  
Robert S. Rosenson ◽  
Ben Taylor ◽  
Stephen P. Glasser ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 1475-1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tuomo Nieminen ◽  
Mika Kähönen ◽  
Leena E Viiri ◽  
Paula Grönroos ◽  
Terho Lehtimäki

2005 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 329-334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacy A Lauderdale ◽  
Amy Heck Sheehan

OBJECTIVE: To describe current data evaluating the use of intensive lipid-lowering therapy in patients with coronary heart disease. DATA SOURCES: A literature search using MEDLINE (1966–September 2004) was conducted using the search terms lipoproteins, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), hydroxymethylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, coronary arteriosclerosis, and coronary disease to identify published trials comparing the effects of intensive and conventional lipid-lowering therapy. DATA SYNTHESIS: Intensive lipid-lowering therapy reduces LDL-C levels significantly more than conventional treatment and appears to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients who have recently experienced acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, evidence suggesting clinical benefits in patients with stable coronary heart disease is currently lacking. CONCLUSIONS: Although data are limited, patients with ACS may benefit from intensive lipid-lowering therapy. Several studies are underway to determine the appropriate role of intensive lipid-lowering therapy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Noack ◽  
B Schwaab ◽  
H Voeller ◽  
K Eckrich ◽  
M Guha ◽  
...  

Abstract Background In the current guideline of the ESC, in patients with very high cardiovascular risk such as coronary heart disease (CHD) a treatment target for LDL-C <1.4mmol/l and/or a halving of the initial value are defined. It is unclear whether these treatment targets are achievable with standard therapy including statins and/or ezetemibe. Methods The primary objective of this prospective, multi-centre register study was the question of the guidance-based adaptation and adherence to lipid-lowering therapy during and after a cardiac rehabilitation in 1,100 patients with CHD up to 12 months after discharge from the six rehabilitation clinics involved. Patients were included from 2016 to 2018. Results The median age of the 1,100 patients was 63.4±10.4 years, the mean BMI was 28.5±4.7kg/m2, and 24.1% of patients were female. 12.2% were active smokers, 91.6% reported dyslipoproteinemia, 33.9% suffered from diabetes mellitus and 86.5% from hypertension. The majority of patients were included with the main indications NSTEMI (31.6%), STEMI (29.6%) and after CABG surgery (26.4%). The proportion of patients treated with statins was more than 94% when admitted and discharged from the rehabilitation clinic, as well as in 3- and 12-months follow-ups. Approximately 9% of patients were treated with ezetemibe at baseline. On discharge from the rehabilitation clinic 23% of patients were treated with ezetemibe, which remains stable at 3 and 12 months. PCSK9 inhibitors were used in 0.1–0.3% of patients at all times. The adjustment of LLT during three week cardiac rehabilitation resulted in median LDL-C values of 2.27mmol/l (1.80/2.84) at baseline, 1.97mmol/l (1.57/2.47) on discharge (p<0.001 compared to baseline), 1.94mmol/l (1.57/2.49) after three months and 1.94mmol/l (1.53/2.40) after 12 months. The proportion of patients with LDL-C <1.4mmol/l was 9% at baseline, 15.7% on discharge (p<0.001 compared to baseline), 15.6% at three-month follow-up and 15.1% at 12-month follow-up (Figure 1). Discussion In the context of cardiac rehabilitation, an effective adjustment of LLT is carried out, which resulted in a significant reduction of LDL-C. However, despite a high percentage of patients on statins and ezetemibe, the proportion of patients in the new target range <1.4mmol/l was only achievable in a small percentage and the question arises whether these treatment targets can be achieved without additional administration of PCSK9 inhibitors in majority of patients with CHD. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): This study was supported by an unrestricted grant from Sanofi-Aventis Germany.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Dyrbus ◽  
M Gasior ◽  
P Desperak ◽  
T Osadnik ◽  
M Banach

Abstract Background Prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is high among patients with CAD. However, data on FH among ACS patients are still scarce. Therefore, we aimed to assess the prevalence, lipid-lowering therapy and short- and long-term outcomes in FH patients with ACS. Methods We finally included 19,781 consecutive patients from the Hyperlipidaemia Therapy in the tERtiary Cardiological cEnTer (TERCET) Registry for years 2006–2018, including 7,319 patients with ACS: 3,085 with STEMI, 2,256 with NSTEMI, and 1,978 due to unstable angina (UA) (stable CAD group [n=12,462] was treated as a reference). FH diagnosis was based on Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) score. Results The overall occurrence of probable/definite FH and possible FH were 1.2% and 13.7% respectively. In ACS patients 1.6% had probable/definite FH and 17.0% possible FH. The highest occurrence of FH was observed in STEMI subgroup, where 20.6% of the patients had ≥3 points according to the DLCN criteria. In patients with definite/probable FH, 98.1% were administered statins at discharge (including 57.5% prescribed intensive statin therapy in comparison to only 23.7% in non-FH patients). Patients with definite/probable FH had higher in-hospital and 30-day mortality than patients without FH (3.5% vs 1.2%, p=0.0046 and 4.4% vs 1.7%, p=0.024, respectively). However, no significant differences in investigated outcomes were observed between the FH groups in the 12-month and 36-month follow-up. The number of patients with FH Conclusion The prevalence of FH (definite/probable/possible) in the Polish very high-risk population is even 14.9% and is significantly higher in patients with ACS than in patients with stable CAD. High intensive lipid lowering therapy, including the combination therapy allows improving long-term outcomes in patients with FH.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document