The three-dimensional bone interface of an osseointegrated implant: A method for study

1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 813-816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasumasa Akagawa ◽  
Masayoshi Wadamoto ◽  
Yuuji Sato ◽  
Hiromichi Tsuru
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Bone Interface ◽  
Osseointegrated Implant

scholarly journals Three-dimensional-printed individualized porous implants: A new “implant-bone” interface fusion concept for large bone defect treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
pp. 3659-3670
Author(s):  
Teng Zhang ◽  
Qingguang Wei ◽  
Hua Zhou ◽  
Zehao Jing ◽  
Xiaoguang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Defect ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Large Bone Defect ◽  
Bone Interface ◽  
Fusion Concept ◽  
Bone Defect Treatment ◽  
Large Bone

scholarly journals High-resolution three-dimensional probes of biomaterials and their interfaces

2012 ◽  
Vol 370 (1963) ◽  
pp. 1337-1351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Grandfield ◽  
Anders Palmquist ◽  
Håkan Engqvist
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Electron Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Controlled Drug Release ◽  
Biological Tissues ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Bone Interface ◽  
Biomaterial Interfaces ◽  
Titania Coating

Interfacial relationships between biomaterials and tissues strongly influence the success of implant materials and their long-term functionality. Owing to the inhomogeneity of biological tissues at an interface, in particular bone tissue, two-dimensional images often lack detail on the interfacial morphological complexity. Furthermore, the increasing use of nanotechnology in the design and production of biomaterials demands characterization techniques on a similar length scale. Electron tomography (ET) can meet these challenges by enabling high-resolution three-dimensional imaging of biomaterial interfaces. In this article, we review the fundamentals of ET and highlight its recent applications in probing the three-dimensional structure of bioceramics and their interfaces, with particular focus on the hydroxyapatite–bone interface, titanium dioxide–bone interface and a mesoporous titania coating for controlled drug release.

Additive Manufacturing: The Next Generation of Scapholunate Ligament Reconstruction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew N. Rush ◽  
Christina Salas ◽  
Lorraine Mottishaw ◽  
Damian Fountain ◽  
Deana Mercer
Keyword(s):  
Additive Manufacturing ◽  
Ligament Reconstruction ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Biological Properties ◽  
Bone Interface ◽  
Significant Strength ◽  
Efficient Integration ◽  
Manufacturing Methods ◽  
Manufacturing Techniques ◽  
Manufacturing Technologies

Abstract Background Ligament reconstruction, as a surgical method used to stabilize joints, requires significant strength and tissue anchoring to restore function. Historically, reconstructive materials have been fraught with problems from an inability to withstand normal physiological loads to difficulties in fabricating the complex organization structure of native tissue at the ligament-to-bone interface. In combination, these factors have prevented the successful realization of nonautograft reconstruction. Methods A review of recent improvements in additive manufacturing techniques and biomaterials highlight possible options for ligament replacement. Description of Technique In combination, three dimensional-printing and electrospinning have begun to provide for nonautograft options that can meet the physiological load and architectures of native tissues; however, a combination of manufacturing methods is needed to allow for bone-ligament enthesis. Hybrid biofabrication of bone-ligament tissue scaffolds, through the simultaneous deposition of disparate materials, offer significant advantages over fused manufacturing methods which lack efficient integration between bone and ligament materials. Results In this review, we discuss the important chemical and biological properties of ligament enthesis and describe recent advancements in additive manufacturing to meet mechanical and biological requirements for a successful bone–ligament–bone interface. Conclusions With continued advancement of additive manufacturing technologies and improved biomaterial properties, tissue engineered bone-ligament scaffolds may soon enter the clinical realm.

scholarly journals To Evaluate the Influence of Different Implant Thread Designs on Stress Distribution of Osseointegrated Implant: A Three-Dimensional Finite-Element Analysis Study–An In Vitro Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 09-16
Author(s):  
Chhavi Sharma ◽  
Tarun Kalra ◽  
Manjit Kumar ◽  
Ajay Bansal ◽  
Anupreet Kaur Chawla
Keyword(s):  
Finite Element Analysis ◽  
Finite Element ◽  
Axial Load ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Von Mises Stress ◽  
Element Analysis ◽  
Osseointegrated Implant ◽  
Implant Therapy ◽  
Von Mises ◽  
Selection Of

Abstract Introduction Dental implants are common treatment modality for tooth loss which leads to unaesthetic appearance and may also cause deterioration of mastication and speech. The aim of implant therapy in dentistry is to restore tissue contour, function, comfort, aesthetic, and speech. Dental implant role is to transfer the mechanical force created during chewing to the supporting osseous tissues within the mandible and maxilla. The importance of biomechanical factors such as the bone-implant interface, implant thread design, the length and diameter of implants, type of loading, the quality and quantity of surrounding bone have been strained by various authors. The selection of implant thread design plays an important role in the outcome of the treatment. This study was done to evaluate the influence of different thread designs on stress distribution of osseointegrated implant using three-dimensional (3D) finite-element analysis. Materials and Methods Three implants with different thread designs, namely V-thread, buttress, and reverse buttress thread designs were considered and dimensions were standardized. The site considered was the mandibular molar region with cortical and cancellous bone assuming to be isotropic and homogeneous. The implant modeling was done with the ANSYS 18.1 software. Axial load (100N) and buccolingual load (50N) were applied. The stresses were calculated as Von Mises stress criterion. Results Minimum von mises Stress concentration was seen for tapered implant body with reverse buttress thread design under axial load 100N and tapered implant body with V-thread under buccolingual load of 50N at cortical bone which signifies bone preservation. Stress levels were observed maximum at implant and minimum at the cancellous bone. Conclusion Hence, within the limitations of this study the results obtained can be applied clinically for appropriate selection of implant thread design for a predictable success of implant therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document