95/05718 Offshore oil and gas activity. Northwest European Continental Shelf Autumn 1995

1995 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 410
1974 ◽  
Vol 188 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. Allcock

Development of offshore oil and gas production from the continental shelf and in even deeper water will be dependent on engineers. It is of primary importance to understand the nature of the oil and gas production industry in order to follow more clearly the contribution that will be required from many of the professional branches of engineering, and a great deal of new technology must be developed in order that the problems of the future may be overcome. The difficulty may not be in defining the future engineering of oil and gas development but in finding engineers in sufficient numbers to meet the demand.


Author(s):  
Martin Hassel ◽  
Ingrid Bouwer Utne ◽  
Jan Erik Vinnem

This article presents a new risk model for estimating the probability of allision risk (the impact between a ship under way and a stationary installation) from passing vessels on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS). Offshore petroleum operators on the NCS are required by the Norwegian Petroleum Safety Authority (PSA) to perform risk assessments to estimate the probability of impacts between ships and offshore installations, both for field related and passing (merchant) vessels. This has typically been done using the aging industry standard COLLIDE risk model, but this article presents a new risk model based on a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) that can replace the old COLLIDE model for passing vessels. The new risk model incorporates a wider range of risk influencing factors (RIFs) and enables a holistic and detailed analysis of risk factors, barrier elements and dependencies. Even though the risk of allision with passing vessels is very small, the potential consequences can be critical. The new risk model is more transparent and provides a better understanding of the mechanisms behind allision risk calculations. The results from the new model are aligned with industry expectations, indicating an overall satisfactory performance. The article discusses several key elements, such as the use of expert judgement to estimate RIFs when no empirical data is available, model sensitivity, and a comparative assessment of the new risk model to the old COLLIDE model.


Author(s):  
T. Earle Hickey ◽  
Mike M. J. Seymour ◽  
Stephen D. Sayle

An offshore survey and environmental assessment was conducted on the Brunei continental shelf offshore oil and gas concession area in 2000–2001. The results of the comparison of the environmental effects of previous ocean disposal of oilbased mud (OBM), water-based mud (WBM) and ester-based synthetic mud (ESBM) was used to prepare guidelines for atsea disposal of mud and cuttings based on the sensitivity of the receiving environment. The ranking, in terms of sensitivity of environmental components are as follows: 1) Shallow coral reefs; 2) Deep reefs; 3) Juvenile shrimp nursery areas; 4) Adult shrimp shallow coastal areas; 5) Adult shrimp mid-shelf areas; 6) the Brunei continental shelf; and, 7) Continental slope and deep water. Detailed instructions are presented for the handling and disposal of WBM and ESBM for each offshore zone. The guidelines are presented in a user-friendly format and provide: description of the environmental zone and it’s sensitivity; the disposal management strategy including options for disposal in order of preference; and requirements for planning, disposal and recommended monitoring and follow-up.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 134-144
Author(s):  
N. S. Abramov

The purpose of the paper is to assess the effectiveness of international legal means of preventing modern threats aimed at offshore oil and gas installations, and to find the optimal solution to eliminate the identified shortcomings. The stated goal determines two key tasks — an analysis of the applicable norms of international law and an analysis of the practice of their implementation. The first part of the paper discusses the development of the concept of security zones as the main international legal means ensuring the protection of installations within the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf. The second part examines the practice of states in enforcing laws and regulations aimed at organizing the safety of facilities in the context of the conclusions reached by international judicial authorities in the case of the Arctic Sunrise vessel. Based on the results of the study, the author concludes that there is some insufficiency and inefficiency of security zones to prevent modern threats. As a solution to this problem, the author proposes to establish “warning zones”, i.e. an additional international legal means to ensure the safety of offshore oil and gas installations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document