Rheological model of hard rock pillar. Technical note

1991 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Korzeniowski

Mathematics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weizhang Liang ◽  
Suizhi Luo ◽  
Guoyan Zhao ◽  
Hao Wu

Predicting pillar stability is a vital task in hard rock mines as pillar instability can cause large-scale collapse hazards. However, it is challenging because the pillar stability is affected by many factors. With the accumulation of pillar stability cases, machine learning (ML) has shown great potential to predict pillar stability. This study aims to predict hard rock pillar stability using gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM) algorithms. First, 236 cases with five indicators were collected from seven hard rock mines. Afterwards, the hyperparameters of each model were tuned using a five-fold cross validation (CV) approach. Based on the optimal hyperparameters configuration, prediction models were constructed using training set (70% of the data). Finally, the test set (30% of the data) was adopted to evaluate the performance of each model. The precision, recall, and F1 indexes were utilized to analyze prediction results of each level, and the accuracy and their macro average values were used to assess the overall prediction performance. Based on the sensitivity analysis of indicators, the relative importance of each indicator was obtained. In addition, the safety factor approach and other ML algorithms were adopted as comparisons. The results showed that GBDT, XGBoost, and LightGBM algorithms achieved a better comprehensive performance, and their prediction accuracies were 0.8310, 0.8310, and 0.8169, respectively. The average pillar stress and ratio of pillar width to pillar height had the most important influences on prediction results. The proposed methodology can provide a reliable reference for pillar design and stability risk management.


2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 427-448
Author(s):  
Bradley Forbes ◽  
Nicholas Vlachopoulos ◽  
Mark S. Diederichs ◽  
Andrew J. Hyett ◽  
Allan Punkkinen

Transactions ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 344 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-30
Author(s):  
K.V. Jessu ◽  
T.R. Kostecki ◽  
A.J.S. Spearing ◽  
G.S. Esterhuizen

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Fager ◽  
Tom Jakobs ◽  
David Beukelman ◽  
Tricia Ternus ◽  
Haylee Schley

Abstract This article summarizes the design and evaluation of a new augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) interface strategy for people with complex communication needs and severe physical limitations. This strategy combines typing, gesture recognition, and word prediction to input text into AAC software using touchscreen or head movement tracking access methods. Eight individuals with movement limitations due to spinal cord injury, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, polio, and Guillain Barre syndrome participated in the evaluation of the prototype technology using a head-tracking device. Fourteen typical individuals participated in the evaluation of the prototype using a touchscreen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document