A desktop computer-based workstation for display and analysis of 3- and 4-dimensional biomedical images

1989 ◽  
Vol 30 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 97-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Erickson
Acute Pain ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 37-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew K McIndoe ◽  
Edward J Hammond

1987 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 405-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. RAO ◽  
S. F. KASH ◽  
H. J. COOLEY ◽  
J. BARNARD

1996 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia H. Latham ◽  
Larry E. Latham ◽  
Steven B. Oppenheimer

Neurosurgery ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 1499-1503
Author(s):  
Cole A. Giller ◽  
Scott J. Clamp

Abstract OBJECTIVE Although radiosurgical practice mandates meticulous radiological follow-up, even the most efficient radiology department can be overwhelmed by the large number of radiosurgical patients who have undergone diagnostic studies for many years at many different institutions to follow many separate lesions. Although the task of assembling these studies is theoretically possible, because they are spread out in time and space, it is often impractical. We therefore sought to construct a computer-based system that could store images from multiple sources and present them instantly for review. METHODS We attached a flatbed film scanner to a standard desktop computer in our clinic and scanned selected sheets of film into an image database at each visit of a radiosurgical patient. “Low-tech” solutions were deliberately chosen—that is, to enhance ease and software compatibility, we used the operating system's directory structure for organization of data instead of proprietary software. Standard commercially available software was used to review studies that had been previously scanned. RESULTS During a 2- to 3-year period, images were scanned from 1129 studies performed on 435 patients. Images could be reviewed instantly and compared with current studies, and scanning a single piece of film required approximately 30 seconds. We estimate that the current capacity of our computer memory will satisfy our needs for approximately 12 years. CONCLUSION Assembly of an efficient and inexpensive system for image storage and retrieval suitable for radiosurgical practice is feasible and straightforward. Although our system is not a substitute for a radiology department, it obviates the constant frustration of “finding the films” and has become an essential part of our radiosurgical practice.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suebsak Nanthavanij ◽  
◽  
Polnapath Payuhaworakulchai ◽  
Kodchawan Siriyong ◽  
Pongsatorn Sarathoontham ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document