Effects on spin and isospin degrees of freedom for pion-nucleus scattering in the glauber theory

1973 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.T. Hess ◽  
J.M. Eisenberg
1992 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 809-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
BO-QIANG MA

The off-shell behaviors of bound nucleons in deep inelastic lepton nucleus scattering are discussed in two scenarios with the basic constituents chosen to be baryon-mesons and quark-gluons respectively in light-cone formalism. It is found that when taking into account the effect due to internal quark structure of nucleons, the derived scaling variable for bound nucleons and the calculated nuclear structure functions are different from those in considering the baryon-mesons as the effective elementary constituents. This implies that the pure baryon-meson descriptions of nuclei give the inaccurate off-shell behavior of the bound nucleon structure function, thereby the quark-gluons seem to be the most appropriate degrees of freedom for nuclear descriptions.


1972 ◽  
Vol 50 (14) ◽  
pp. 1609-1613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melvyn E. Best

For incident neutron energies between 20 MeV and 10 GeV the total neutron–nucleus [Formula: see text] cross sections were calculated using Glauber theory. Remarkably good agreement between experiment and theory was found at energies above 250 MeV. Using the same formalism with identical nuclear parameters, the π−–C cross sections were calculated for incident pion energies near the (3, 3) resonance. In this case, however, good agreement between theory and experiment was found for pion energies above 150 MeV.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (02n06) ◽  
pp. 215-224
Author(s):  
◽  
HAIYAN GAO

The γn → π-p and γp → π+n reactions are essential probes of the transition from meson-nucleon degrees of freedom to quark-gluon degrees of feedom in exclusive processes. The cross sections of these processes are also, advantageous, for the investigation of oscillatory behavior around the quark counting prediction, since they decrease relatively slower with energy compared with other photon-induced processes. Moreover, these photoreactions in nuclei can probe the QCD nuclear filtering and color transparency effects. In this talk, I discuss the preliminary results on the γp → π+n and γn → π-p processes at a center-of-mass angle of 90° from Jefferson Lab experiment E94-104. I also discuss a new experiment in which singles γp → π+n measurement from hydrogen, and coincidence γn → π-p measurements at the quasifree kinematics from deuterium and 12 C for photon energies between 2.25 GeV to 5.8 GeV in fine steps at a center-of-mass angle of 90° are planned. The proposed measurement will allow a detailed investigation of the oscillatory scaling behavior in photopion production processes and the study of the nuclear dependence of rather mysterious oscillations with energy that previous experiments have indicated. The various nuclear and perturbative QCD approaches, ranging from Glauber theory, to quark-counting, to Sudakov-corrected independent scattering, make dramatically different predictions for the experimental outcomes.


1978 ◽  
Vol 74 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 316-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Harrington ◽  
Girish K. Varma

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (05) ◽  
pp. 1550035 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. K. Lukyanov ◽  
E. V. Zemlyanaya ◽  
K. V. Lukyanov ◽  
A. Y. Ellithi ◽  
I. A. M. Abdul-Magead

The pion-nucleus microscopic optical potential (OP), defined by the pion-nucleon scattering amplitude and by the generalized density distribution of a target nucleus that incudes internal degrees of freedom, is applied to construct the pion-nucleus differential cross-sections of elastic and inelastic scattering on the nuclei 28 Si , 58 Ni , 208 Pb at T lab = 291 MeV. Calculations are based on the relativistic wave equation and thus relativistic effects and distortions on the relative motion wave functions are taken into account. The respective experimental data are analyzed and the in-medium parameters of the elementary πN-amplitude are established and compared with those from the pion scattering on free nucleons.


2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao Yao-Lin ◽  
Ma Zhong-Yu ◽  
Chen Bao-Qiu

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document