Cortical influence on synaptic transmission within the spinal cord as demonstrated by central delay changes in man

Author(s):  
G. ABBRUZZESE ◽  
D. DALL'AGATA ◽  
M. MORENA ◽  
M. ABBRUZZESE ◽  
L. RENI ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 175 (12) ◽  
pp. 2322-2336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir Nerandzic ◽  
Petra Mrozkova ◽  
Pavel Adamek ◽  
Diana Spicarova ◽  
Istvan Nagy ◽  
...  

1991 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 1048-1048
Author(s):  
J. R. Ledsome

A meeting was held at the University of British Columbia on May 28–29, 1990 to honour the many important scientific contributions made by Dr. Hugh McLennan to our understanding of chemical neurotransmission in the brain and spinal cord. The invited speakers were those with whom Dr. McLennan has at one time or another collaborated, and their presentations reflected Hugh's early interest in GÀBA (factor I) as an inhibitory transmitter and his research over the last two decades into the physiology and pharmacology of acidic amino acid receptors.The session on GABA opened with an intriguing discussion by Professor Florey of the history of the isolation and identification of GABA as a neurotransmitter and was followed by papers dealing with the electrophysiological actions of GABA. Professor Curtis discussed its pre- and post-synaptic actions in the spinal cord, while Dr. Mathers presented data derived from GABA-gated chloride channels isolated from cultured neurones. Professor Krnjević was unfortunately unable to attend the symposium.Work presented by Professors Watkins and Lodge and Dr. Curry provided an excellent historical perspective on the birth and rapid development of excitatory amino acid pharmacology, a field to which Dr. McLennan has contributed enormously.Among the topics pertaining to the electrophysiological actions of acidic amino acids was the role of the NMDA receptor both in long-term potentiation (Dr. Collingridge) and in synaptic transmission in the kainic acid-lesioned hippocampus (Dr. Wheal), the effects of antagonists on synaptic transmission in the thalamus (Dr. Hicks), and the modulation by catecholamines of glutamate-induced neuronal excitations (Dr. Marshall).In his closing address Dr. McLennan, with characteristic grace and style, acknowledged the efforts of his co-workers in his many achievements. Those of us who have had the great pleasure of collaborating with Hugh here at UBC or within the scientific community wish him all the best in his retirement.


1966 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-80
Author(s):  
B. T. CHARLTON ◽  
E. G. GRAY

Synapses with a cleft with ‘thickened’ membranes and presynaptic vesicles and mitochondria occur commonly throughout the grey matter of the spinal cord of goldfish, frog and various mammals studied. Such synapses are generally thought to have a chemical mode of transmission. The absence or rare occurrence of presynaptic neurofilaments in fish and frog accounts for the failure to detect boutons by silver methods, and there is no need to postulate morphologically unspecialized synaptic contacts in the lower vertebrates as some light microscopists did. Both fish and frog show axo-somatic or axo-dendritic tight junctions, which could be sites of electrical synaptic transmission. No neuronal tight junctions have yet been seen in the mammalian spinal cord. Axo-axo-dendritic synapses have been seen in the frog and mammalian cord, but not so far in the fish. Such serial synapses may be responsible for presynaptic inhibition. Neuroglia of fish, frog and mammals have tight junctions at their apposed surfaces. These differ structurally from neuronal tight junctions. Neuroglia in fish cord have, in addition, desmosomes at their apposed surfaces.


1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 4031-4039 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Parker ◽  
S. Grillner

1. Tachykinin-like immunoreactivity is found in the dorsal roots, dorsal horn, and dorsal column of the lamprey. The effect of tachykinins on sensory processing was examined by recording intracellularly from primary sensory dorsal cells and second-order spinobulbar giant interneurons. Modulation of synaptic transmission was examined by making paired recordings from dorsal cells and giant interneurons, or by eliciting compound depolarizations in the giant interneurons by stimulating the dorsal root or dorsal column. 2. Bath application of tachykinins depolarized the dorsal cells. This effect was mimicked by stimulation of the dorsal root, suggesting that dorsal root afferents may be a source of endogenous tachykinin input to the spinal cord. The depolarization was reduced by removal of sodium or calcium from the Ringer, or when potassium conductances were blocked, and was not associated with a measurable change in input resistance. Dorsal root stimulation also caused a depolarization in the dorsal cells, and this effect and that of bath-applied substance P, was blocked by the tachykinin antagonist spantide. 3. The tachykinin substance P could reduce inward and outward rectification in the dorsal cells, the effect on outward rectification only being seen when potassium conductances were blocked by tetraethylammonium (TEA). 4. Substance P increased the excitability of the dorsal cells and giant interneurons, shown by the increased spiking in response to depolarizing current pulses. The increased excitability was blocked by the tachykinin antagonist spantide. 5. Substance P modulated the dorsal cell action potential, by increasing the spike duration and reducing the amplitude of the afterhyperpolarization. The spike amplitude was not consistently affected. 6. Stimulation of the dorsal column resulted in either depolarizing or hyperpolarizing potentials in the giant interneurons. The amplitude of the depolarization was increased by substance P, whereas the amplitude of the hyperpolarization was reduced. These effects occurred independently of a measurable change in postsynaptic input resistance, suggesting that the modulation occurred presynaptically. Paired recordings from dorsal cells and giant interneurons failed to reveal an effect of substance P on dorsal cell-evoked excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs), suggesting that the potentiation of the dorsal column-evoked depolarization was due to an effect on other axons in the dorsal column. Dorsal root-evoked potentials could also be increased in the presence of substance P, although this effect was less consistent than the effect on dorsal column stimulation. 7. These results suggest that tachykinins modulate sensory input to the lamprey spinal cord by increasing the excitability of primary afferents and second-order giant interneurons, and also by modulating synaptic transmission. Tachykinins may result in potentiation of local spinal reflexes and also modulation of descending reticulospinal inputs to the spinal locomotor network as a result of potentiation of spinobulbar inputs.


1994 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergio H. Dueñas ◽  
E.Julio Muñoz-Martínez ◽  
Pedro Joseph-Nathan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document