PROVIDING INTELLIGENT ASSISTANCE IN DISTRIBUTED OFFICE ENVIRONMENTS11This work was supported by the Air Force Systems Command, Rome Air Development Center, Griffiss Air Force Base, NY 13441-5700, and the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Bolling Air Force Base, D.C. 20332 under contract number F30602

Author(s):  
Sergei Nirenburg ◽  
Victor Lesser
1999 ◽  
Vol 121 (08) ◽  
pp. 64-66
Author(s):  
William Loob

This article presents a review about the jet engine testing facilities of the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division in Trenton, NJ, that had to be moved to a base run by another branch of the military, the Arnold Engineering Development Center at Arnold Air Force Base in Tennessee. The jet engine testing complex at Trenton had been built in the 1950s. The restriction effectively ruled out any upgrades so long as the Navy’s engine test requirements could be met by replicating the capabilities of the old facility. The natural tendency of the engineers and planners looking at the project was to think immediately about how the facility could be improved with modern designs. For the restriction on not improving the test capability at Trenton, the project ironically provided an expansion of services. This is built to subject the Navy engines to definite environmental conditions, and as long as the Navy has that kind of test requirement. It is a capability that is available not only to the Navy and Air Force, but to the Army, Marines, and private industry as well.


1985 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Seymour Morris ◽  
Preston MacDiarmid

The use of reliability growth and test-analyze-and-fix (TAAF) testing has become widespread within the Department of Defense as complements to and substitutes for formal reliability qualification testing (RQT). Many different models, tools and techniques for their use have been presented in the literature, military standards and handbooks. Still, many reliability experts within DoD question the utility and cost effectiveness of reliability growth testing and describe it as rewarding contractors for sloppy initial designs. This paper presents an overview of a Rome Air Development Center (RADC) in-house study whose objective was to fully investigate the subject of reliability growth testing to enable a better understanding by reliability engineers as well as to present guidance for its potential application in the development of Air Force systems.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document