Microbial biofilm growth vs. tissue integration: “The race for the surface” experimentally studied

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 1399-1404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guruprakash Subbiahdoss ◽  
Roel Kuijer ◽  
Dirk W. Grijpma ◽  
Henny C. van der Mei ◽  
Henk J. Busscher
2010 ◽  
Vol 9999A ◽  
pp. NA-NA ◽  
Author(s):  
Guruprakash Subbiahdoss ◽  
Dirk W. Grijpma ◽  
Henny C. van der Mei ◽  
Henk J. Busscher ◽  
Roel Kuijer

2009 ◽  
Vol 384 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.F. Bruhn ◽  
S.M. Frank ◽  
F.F. Roberto ◽  
P.J. Pinhero ◽  
S.G. Johnson

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander K. Y. Tam ◽  
Brendan Harding ◽  
J. Edward F. Green ◽  
Sanjeeva Balasuriya ◽  
Benjamin J. Binder

Understanding microbial biofilm growth is important to public health, because biofilms are a leading cause of persistent clinical infections. In this paper, we develop a thin-film model for microbial biofilm growth on a solid substratum to which it adheres strongly. We model biofilms as two-phase viscous fluid mixtures of living cells and extracellular fluid. The model tracks the movement, depletion, and uptake of nutrients explicitly, and incorporates cell proliferation via a nutrient-dependent source term. Notably, our thin-film reduction is two-dimensional and includes the vertical dependence of cell volume fraction. Numerical solutions show that this vertical dependence is weak for biologically-feasible parameters, reinforcing results from previous models in which this dependence was neglected. We exploit this weak dependence by writing and solving a simplified one-dimensional model that is computationally more efficient than the full model. We use both the one and two-dimensional models to predict how model parameters affect expansion speed and biofilm thickness. This analysis reveals that expansion speed depends on cell proliferation, nutrient availability, cell-cell adhesion on the upper surface, and slip on the biofilm-substratum interface. Our numerical solutions provide a means to qualitatively distinguish between the extensional flow and lubrication regimes, and quantitative predictions that can be tested in future experiments.


2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (20) ◽  
pp. 7271-7280 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Auguet ◽  
M. Pijuan ◽  
J. Batista ◽  
C. M. Borrego ◽  
O. Gutierrez

ABSTRACTThe coexistence of sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and methanogenic archaea (MA) in anaerobic biofilms developed in sewer inner pipe surfaces favors the accumulation of sulfide (H2S) and methane (CH4) as metabolic end products, causing severe impacts on sewerage systems. In this study, we investigated the time course of H2S and CH4production and emission rates during different stages of biofilm development in relation to changes in the composition of microbial biofilm communities. The study was carried out in a laboratory sewer pilot plant that mimics a full-scale anaerobic rising sewer using a combination of process data and molecular techniques (e.g., quantitative PCR [qPCR], denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [DGGE], and 16S rRNA gene pyrotag sequencing). After 2 weeks of biofilm growth, H2S emission was notably high (290.7 ± 72.3 mg S-H2S liter−1day−1), whereas emissions of CH4remained low (17.9 ± 15.9 mg COD-CH4liter−1day−1). This contrasting trend coincided with a stable SRB community and an archaeal community composed solely of methanogens derived from the human gut (i.e.,MethanobrevibacterandMethanosphaera). In turn, CH4emissions increased after 1 year of biofilm growth (327.6 ± 16.6 mg COD-CH4liter−1day−1), coinciding with the replacement of methanogenic colonizers by species more adapted to sewer conditions (i.e.,Methanosaetaspp.). Our study provides data that confirm the capacity of our laboratory experimental system to mimic the functioning of full-scale sewers both microbiologically and operationally in terms of sulfide and methane production, gaining insight into the complex dynamics of key microbial groups during biofilm development.


2016 ◽  
Vol 05 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elexson Nillian ◽  
Sheryl Melinda ◽  
Micky Vincent ◽  
Leslie Bilung

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernhard Hiebl ◽  
Dorothee Rickert ◽  
Rosemarie Fuhrmann ◽  
Friedrich Jung ◽  
Andres Lendlein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document