Greenhouse gas abatement strategies for animal husbandry

2006 ◽  
Vol 112 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 163-170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gert-Jan Monteny ◽  
Andre Bannink ◽  
David Chadwick
2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 513
Author(s):  
Lance Gagelman ◽  
Bailey Norwood

Beef is often identified as one of the foods with the largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, causing climate-conscious persons to seek changes in their diets. This study evaluated the ability of a household to reduce its GHG emissions by replacing conventional US beef with grass-fed beef and compared its effectiveness to three other strategies: replacing beef with chicken, becoming a vegetarian, and purchasing carbon offsets. These potential GHG-reducing strategies were considered within a model of a typical US household, using a framework that accounts for all household expenditures and carbon emissions. Replacing beef with chicken and adopting vegetarianism reduced the household’s GHG emissions by 1% and 3%, respectively. Grass-fed beef only reduced emissions if the GHG sequestration rate for pastureland and/or the price of grass-fed beef was high. It is shown that persons paying higher prices for grass-fed beef with the goal of smaller GHG emissions might want to consider buying conventional beef instead and using the savings to purchase carbon offsets. Also, although vegetarianism is often touted as a climate-friendly diet, the model shows that meat-eaters can achieve the same GHG reduction by spending only US$19 per year on carbon offsets. These results assume that additional land for grazing is acquired from recently abandoned cropland, which gives grass-fed beef its best chance at being climate-friendly. Alternative land-use assumptions would only reinforce the result that grass-fed beef does not emit less GHG emissions than conventional beef.


Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3675
Author(s):  
Terrence W. Iverson ◽  
Joanne C. Burgess ◽  
Edward B. Barbier

Although national commitments to the Paris Climate Accord have waned, carbon mitigation by sub-national entities is on the rise globally. We examine the effectiveness of sub-national jurisdictions (e.g., states, provinces, cities) in collectively enacting greenhouse gas abatement strategies. We develop a simple model to explore the conditions under which an agreement among sub-national jurisdictions within a country may lead to substantial carbon abatement relative to a national policy determined through majority rule. We find that, in the absence of a functional national policy response, a coordinated sub-national agreement can generate meaningful abatement. This could form an important stopgap measure in the absence of better alternatives.


Climate ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arja Asikainen ◽  
Erkki Pärjälä ◽  
Matti Jantunen ◽  
Jouni T. Tuomisto ◽  
and Clive E. Sabel

2019 ◽  
Vol 236 ◽  
pp. 117589 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Mosnier ◽  
Wolfgang Britz ◽  
Thomas Julliere ◽  
Stéphane De Cara ◽  
Pierre-Alain Jayet ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 7-13
Author(s):  
Radik Safin ◽  
Ayrat Valiev ◽  
Valeriya Kolesar

Global climatic changes have a negative impact on the development of all sectors of the economy, including agriculture. However, the very production of agricultural products is one of the most important sources of greenhouse gases entering the atmosphere. Taking into account the need to reduce the “carbon footprint” in food production, a special place is occupied by the analysis of the volume of greenhouse gas emissions and the development of measures for their sequestration in agriculture. One of the main directions for reducing emissions and immobilizing greenhouse gases is the development of special techniques for their sequestration in the soil, including those used in agriculture. Adaptation of existing farming systems for this task will significantly reduce the “carbon footprint” from agricultural production, including animal husbandry. The development of carbon farming allows not only to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but also to significantly increase the level of soil fertility, primarily by increasing the content of organic matter in them. As a result, it becomes possible, along with the production of crop production, to produce “carbon units” that are sold on local and international markets. The paper analyzes possible greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture and the potential for their sequestration in agricultural soils. The role of various elements of the farming system in solving the problem of reducing the “carbon footprint” is considered and ways of developing carbon farming in the Republic of Tatarstan are proposed


Kyklos ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 321-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gunter Stephan ◽  
Georg Müller-Fürstenberger

Author(s):  
Leorey Marquez ◽  
Nariida Smith ◽  
David Kilsby ◽  
Mike Taylor ◽  
Rocco Zito

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document