High bee functional diversity buffers crop pollination services against Amazon deforestation

2022 ◽  
Vol 326 ◽  
pp. 107777
Author(s):  
Alistair John Campbell ◽  
Elinor M. Lichtenberg ◽  
Luísa Gigante Carvalheiro ◽  
Cristiano Menezes ◽  
Rafael Cabral Borges ◽  
...  
2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 499-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taylor H. Ricketts ◽  
James Regetz ◽  
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter ◽  
Saul A. Cunningham ◽  
Claire Kremen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 811-820
Author(s):  
Eric V. Lonsdorf ◽  
Insu Koh ◽  
Taylor Ricketts

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. A. Woodcock ◽  
M. P. D. Garratt ◽  
G. D. Powney ◽  
R. F. Shaw ◽  
J. L. Osborne ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Kleijn ◽  
Rachael Winfree ◽  
Ignasi Bartomeus ◽  
Luísa G Carvalheiro ◽  
Mickaël Henry ◽  
...  

Abstract There is compelling evidence that more diverse ecosystems deliver greater benefits to people, and these ecosystem services have become a key argument for biodiversity conservation. However, it is unclear how much biodiversity is needed to deliver ecosystem services in a cost-effective way. Here we show that, while the contribution of wild bees to crop production is significant, service delivery is restricted to a limited subset of all known bee species. Across crops, years and biogeographical regions, crop-visiting wild bee communities are dominated by a small number of common species, and threatened species are rarely observed on crops. Dominant crop pollinators persist under agricultural expansion and many are easily enhanced by simple conservation measures, suggesting that cost-effective management strategies to promote crop pollination should target a different set of species than management strategies to promote threatened bees. Conserving the biological diversity of bees therefore requires more than just ecosystem-service-based arguments.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignasi Bartomeus ◽  
Daniel P. Cariveau ◽  
Tina Harrison ◽  
Rachael Winfree

AbstractThe response and effect trait framework, if supported empirically, would provide for powerful and general predictions about how biodiversity loss will lead to loss in ecosystem function. This framework proposes that species traits will explain how different species respond to disturbance (i.e. response traits) as well as their contribution to ecosystem function (i.e. effect traits). However, predictive response and effect traits remain elusive for most systems. Here, we present detailed data on crop pollination services provided by native, wild bees to explore the role of six commonly used species traits in determining how crop pollination is affected by increasing agricultural intensification. Analyses were conducted in parallel for three crop systems (watermelon, cranberry, and blueberry) located within the same geographical region (mid-Atlantic USA). Bee species traits did not strongly predict species’ response to agricultural intensification, and the few traits that were weakly predictive were not consistent across crops. Similarly, no trait predicted species’ overall functional contribution in any of the three crop systems, although body size was a good predictor of per capita efficiency in two systems. So far, most studies looking for response or effect traits in pollination systems have found weak and often contradicting links. Overall we were unable to make generalizable predictions regarding species responses to land-use change and its effect on the delivery of ecosystem services. Pollinator traits may be useful for understanding ecological processes in some systems, but thus far the promise of traits-based ecology has yet to be fulfilled for pollination ecology.


2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1838) ◽  
pp. 20161472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrika Samnegård ◽  
Peter A. Hambäck ◽  
Debissa Lemessa ◽  
Sileshi Nemomissa ◽  
Kristoffer Hylander

The expansion of pollinator-dependent crops, especially in the developing world, together with reports of worldwide pollinator declines, raises concern of possible yield gaps. Farmers directly reliant on pollination services for food supply often live in regions where our knowledge of pollination services is poor. In a manipulative experiment replicated at 23 sites across an Ethiopian agricultural landscape, we found poor pollination services and severe pollen limitation in a common oil crop. With supplementary pollination, the yield increased on average by 91%. Despite the heterogeneous agricultural matrix, we found a low bee abundance, which may explain poor pollination services. The variation in pollen limitation was unrelated to surrounding forest cover, local bee richness and bee abundance. While practices that commonly increase pollinators (restricted pesticide use, flower strips) are an integral part of the landscape, these elements are apparently insufficient. Management to increase pollination services is therefore in need of urgent investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document