The association between the degree of fever as measured in the emergency department and clinical outcomes of hospitalized adult patients

2022 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 92-98
Author(s):  
Erez Marcusohn ◽  
Iftach Gibory ◽  
Asaf Miller ◽  
Ari M. Lipsky ◽  
Ami Neuberger ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-135
Author(s):  
Nadia Ayala-Lopez ◽  
Roa Harb

Abstract Background The anion gap is primarily used in the diagnosis of acid-base disorders. We conducted a study to determine the anion gap reference interval in our patient population, investigated the workup of abnormal vs normal anion gaps, and examined the anion gap variation upon repeated testing. Methods A retrospective review was performed on 17137 adult and pediatric patients who presented to Yale-New Haven Hospital outpatient clinics, emergency department, or intensive care units between 2012 and 2017. Results We derived a new reference interval of 7 to 18 mmol/L with a median of 13 mmol/L in healthy adults with no significant differences owing to partitioning by sex or age. Based on the new reference interval, 5%, 23%, and 18% of healthy, emergency department, and intensive care unit adult patients, respectively, were misclassified as having high values with the previous interval of 6 to 16 mmol/L. However, there were no significant differences in the number of tests ordered in patients with anion gaps above and below the upper limit of the previous reference interval. The majority of increased anion gaps that were repeated normalized by 12 h. In a subgroup of healthy adult patients with annual testing, the median percent change in each patient's anion gap from 2015 to 2016 was approximately 13%. Conclusions The anion gap should be used with an appropriate reference interval to avoid misclassification. There may be a moderate degree of individuality that argues for comparing the anion gap with its baseline value in the same patient pending further studies that formally derive its biological variation.


2011 ◽  
Vol 31 (7) ◽  
pp. 1603-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Burkett ◽  
K. L. Vandemheen ◽  
T. Giesbrecht-Lewis ◽  
K. Ramotar ◽  
W. Ferris ◽  
...  

Thorax ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 680-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. de Boer ◽  
K. L. Vandemheen ◽  
E. Tullis ◽  
S. Doucette ◽  
D. Fergusson ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 53-55
Author(s):  
Harsimran Singh Das

Introduction:qCSI (Quick COVID severity index) is a clinical tool established recently post pandemic to predict respiratory failure within 24 hours of admission in COVID-19 patients; respiratory failure being explain as increased oxygen requirement greater than 6L/min by low ow device, high ow device, noninvasive or invasive ventilation to maintain spO2 of greater than or equal to 94%, or death. Aim:To verify and validate the application of the qCSI in Emergency Department in Indian demographic for evidence-based guidance to aid physician decision making in safely dispositioning adult patients with COVID-19 with oxygen requirement less than or equal to 6L/min via low ow devices including nasal cannula and oxygen mask Materials and methods:This is an observational, retrospective study from Emergency Department in a private tertiary care hospital of admitted adult patients with COVID-19 disease. Clinical parameters in qCSI and disposition of 210 patients admitted through Emergency Department included in this study selected randomly was sought on admission and clinical status with level of care 24 hours following admission was recorded and compared with prediction based on qCSI from a period of 1 May 2020 to 31 October 2020. Result:We found that19(9.0%) patients Initial qCSI Score was Low, 80(38.1%) patients Initial qCSI Score was Low-intermediate, 84(40.0%) patients Initial qCSI Score was High-intermediate and 27(12.9%)patients Initial qCSI Score was High.qCSI Score after 24 hours 16(11.4%) patients were Low, 43(30.7%) patients were Low-intermediate, 63(45.0%) patients was High-intermediate and 18(12.9%) patients was High.Out of 210(100.0%) patients, 70 (33.3%) patients were critically ill. Conclusion:In conclusion these data show that the quick COVID-19 Severity Index provides easily accessed risk stratication relevant to Emergency Department provider.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document