Influence of palatal expanders on oral comfort, speech, and mastication

Author(s):  
Nanci L. Oliveira De Felippe ◽  
Adriana C. Da Silveira ◽  
Grace Viana ◽  
Bonnie Smith
Keyword(s):  
1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1963-1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
F G LeVeque ◽  
J B Parzuchowski ◽  
G C Farinacci ◽  
S W Redding ◽  
B Rodu ◽  
...  

PURPOSE This open-label, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy of a mucoadherent, anesthetic medication (MGI 209) for relief from painful oral ulcers associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-eight eligible cancer patients who had up to five discrete oral ulcers (total area < or = 5 cm2) completed this study. Mean age was 53.5 years (range, 21 to 81). Subjective assessments of oral discomfort before and after an orange juice pain challenge (OJPC), which was measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), and visual estimates of the amount of MGI 209 that remained on treated ulcers were collected at (1) baseline (before MGI 209 treatment); and (2) 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes posttreatment. RESULTS Most subjects had low VAS scores (4 or less), which was indicative of oral discomfort, at baseline before and after the OJPC. At 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes after MGI 209 treatment, most subjects had high VAS scores before and after an OJPC compared with baseline scores, which was indicative of a substantial increase in oral comfort; these differences were statistically significant (P < .0001). Mean percent of MGI 209 estimated to remain on ulcers at the previously mentioned times was 93.7%, 90.3%, 79.6%, and 71.3% of the total amount applied, respectively. CONCLUSION Benzocaine hydrochloride in combination with the protective, mucoadherent film-coating relieved discomfort for at least 3 hours even with exposure to an irritating beverage. MGI 209 treatment should allow patients with chemotherapy-induced oral ulcers to drink and eat with significantly diminished pain or no pain.


Author(s):  
Ariane Hohoff ◽  
Didier Fillion ◽  
Thomas Stamm ◽  
Gerhard Goder ◽  
Cristina Sauerland ◽  
...  

1989 ◽  
Vol 3 (34) ◽  
pp. 18-18
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Paula da Rosa Possebon ◽  
Alessandra Julie Schuster ◽  
Raissa Micaella Marcello-Machado ◽  
Ana Paula Pinto Martins ◽  
Luciana de Rezende Pinto ◽  
...  

Background: Facial types may interfere in the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and masticatory performance of implant-retained mandibular overdenture (IMO) wearers.Purpose: Investigate the medium-term changes in the masticatory function (MF) and OHRQoL parameters of IMO users, as a function of facial pattern, anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy, and sex.Methods: Forty IMO users, most of them Caucasian (90%) with average age of 69.17 years were classified according to their facial pattern and antero-posterior discrepancy prior to rehabilitation. MF was evaluated by the multiple sieves method to determine the average particle size (X50), heterogeneity (B) and masticatory efficiency (ME, calculated as the percentage of material retained in the 5.6 and 2.8 mm sieves), using Masticatory performance (MP) and swallowing threshold (ST) tests. OHRQoL was measured by applying the dental impact on daily life (DIDL) questionnaire. The data were analyzed by Wilcoxon-paired tests to analyze changes in MF parameters over time, and mixed-effect multilevel regression models were employed to verify differences between groups.Results: Significant changes were still observed in the 3rd year for the ST test with improvements in B for Mesofacial and in time for Dolichofacial individuals, while ME_2.8 deteriorated for Brachyfacial participants. B values of Class I and male individuals improved and brachyfacial individuals still presented worse homogenization (B) than Mesofacial participants in both masticatory tests. Class II and III participants still showed improvements in ME_5.6 and time compared to Class I despite increases in X50. Class II individuals needed less cycles than Class I in the 3rd year. Brachyfacial participants scored lower in the Appearance domain than Mesofacial ones in the 3rd year. Dolichofacial participants and Class III patients scored lower in the Oral Comfort domain than Mesofacial and Class I, respectively. In addition, age influenced the Pain, Oral Comfort and General Performance domains in the 3rd year.Conclusions: Differences in facial morphology continue to influence the MF and OHRQoL outcomes in the 3rd year, and age influenced some OHRQoL domains. Brachyfacial individuals continue to benefit least from rehabilitation with IMO according to masticatory parameters.


1990 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. WITTER ◽  
P. ELTEREN ◽  
A.F. KÄYSER ◽  
G.M.J.M. ROSSUM

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adeline Braud ◽  
Ronan Symoneaux ◽  
Corinne Patron ◽  
Céline Brasse ◽  
Véronique Forgerit ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document